|
|
Post by Angelo on Aug 4, 2017 20:02:19 GMT -5
If I still had my materials from school I'd list off the dozen of studies that prove you wrong. Instead, a quick google to show you... www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527429/which in part shows when you adjust for socio-economic situation of the area (unemployment, income, education, etc...) it pretty much evens out. Early on in the article it references multiple studies that have shown that in the past too. Lol. From your study: "Higher concentrations of African-American and Hispanics were associated with greater risk of being a homicide victim from 2003 to 2005 (Table 3, separate predictors). This was not the case in census block groups with a higher concentration of Asians and Caucasians." Backing up a point I made a long time ago. African Americans are concentrated in lower socio-economic areas. You can link their concentration to such areas. Once you break down the absolute numbers of the racial breakdown, the per capita of crime by race evens out. For instance, you have a concentration of AA in neighborhood 'X'. The actual #s are as followed 200 AA 50 Caucasian Breakdown of crime committed in that neighborhood by race 100 by AA (50% per capita AA) 25 by Caucasian (50% per capita white) They committed crimes at equal rates even though the concentration of the bloc was higher towards AA. I'm not disagreeing that the concentrated areas of minorities are where you find the most crime. That is the case everywhere in the world and that has been recognized for over 2000 years. The question then becomes though, is it because of race, or is it because of the area they are concentrated in. Every legit study in the past 70 years has shown that it comes down to where someone lives as the main precursor to crime instead of their race. The non-minorities that live in those minority concentrated areas commit crime at the same rate the minorities there do. It is linked to education, income, employment, and family unit structure (though the family unit influence has been shown to have a decreasing effect on crime rates one way or another over the last 15-20 years) |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 4, 2017 20:20:08 GMT -5
Lol. From your study: "Higher concentrations of African-American and Hispanics were associated with greater risk of being a homicide victim from 2003 to 2005 (Table 3, separate predictors). This was not the case in census block groups with a higher concentration of Asians and Caucasians." Backing up a point I made a long time ago. African Americans are concentrated in lower socio-economic areas. You can link their concentration to such areas. Once you break down the absolute numbers of the racial breakdown, the per capita of crime by race evens out. For instance, you have a concentration of AA in neighborhood 'X'. The actual #s are as followed 200 AA 50 Caucasian Breakdown of crime committed in that neighborhood by race 100 by AA (50% per capita AA) 25 by Caucasian (50% per capita white) They committed crimes at equal rates even though the concentration of the bloc was higher towards AA. I'm not disagreeing that the concentrated areas of minorities are where you find the most crime. That is the case everywhere in the world and that has been recognized for over 2000 years. The question then becomes though, is it because of race, or is it because of the area they are concentrated in. Every legit study in the past 70 years has shown that it comes down to where someone lives as the main precursor to crime instead of their race. The non-minorities that live in those minority concentrated areas commit crime at the same rate the minorities there do. It is linked to education, income, employment, and family unit structure (though the family unit influence has been shown to have a decreasing effect on crime rates one way or another over the last 15-20 years) I posted links with very concise analysis of the DOJ crime stats to backup my opinion that blacks in the US are committing the majority of violent crime, particularly at a much higher rate per capita than any other race. However, despite the data i posted, you disagree, yet you haven't posted any material that disputes my assessment or the analysis in my links. If you disagree to the point where you decide to post a rebutal, please provide legitimate links and data to support your argument...dont just say, "nuh uh." |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Aug 4, 2017 20:42:07 GMT -5
Backing up a point I made a long time ago. African Americans are concentrated in lower socio-economic areas. You can link their concentration to such areas. Once you break down the absolute numbers of the racial breakdown, the per capita of crime by race evens out. For instance, you have a concentration of AA in neighborhood 'X'. The actual #s are as followed 200 AA 50 Caucasian Breakdown of crime committed in that neighborhood by race 100 by AA (50% per capita AA) 25 by Caucasian (50% per capita white) They committed crimes at equal rates even though the concentration of the bloc was higher towards AA. I'm not disagreeing that the concentrated areas of minorities are where you find the most crime. That is the case everywhere in the world and that has been recognized for over 2000 years. The question then becomes though, is it because of race, or is it because of the area they are concentrated in. Every legit study in the past 70 years has shown that it comes down to where someone lives as the main precursor to crime instead of their race. The non-minorities that live in those minority concentrated areas commit crime at the same rate the minorities there do. It is linked to education, income, employment, and family unit structure (though the family unit influence has been shown to have a decreasing effect on crime rates one way or another over the last 15-20 years) I posted links with very concise analysis of the DOJ crime stats to backup my opinion that blacks in the US are committing the majority of violent crime, particularly at a much higher rate per capita than any other race. However, despite the data i posted, you disagree, yet you haven't posted any material that disputes my assessment or the analysis in my links. If you disagree to the point where you decide to post a rebutal, please provide legitimate links and data to support your argument...dont just say, "nuh uh." No, I agreed with you, and posted better studies that back up your point even more. My point was those stats don't tell the whole story, and are misleading. Blacks commit the higher majority per capita because they are more likely to live in the lower socio-economic areas. The crime isn't linked to the race but rather to the area in which people live. If you look at those areas, the races pretty much commit crimes at the same per-capita rate. Blacks committing more crimes in the US is a prime example of correlation not causation. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2017 7:51:11 GMT -5
Lol. From your study: "Higher concentrations of African-American and Hispanics were associated with greater risk of being a homicide victim from 2003 to 2005 (Table 3, separate predictors). This was not the case in census block groups with a higher concentration of Asians and Caucasians." Backing up a point I made a long time ago. African Americans are concentrated in lower socio-economic areas. You can link their concentration to such areas. Once you break down the absolute numbers of the racial breakdown, the per capita of crime by race evens out. For instance, you have a concentration of AA in neighborhood 'X'. The actual #s are as followed 200 AA 50 Caucasian Breakdown of crime committed in that neighborhood by race 100 by AA (50% per capita AA) 25 by Caucasian (50% per capita white) They committed crimes at equal rates even though the concentration of the bloc was higher towards AA. I'm not disagreeing that the concentrated areas of minorities are where you find the most crime. That is the case everywhere in the world and that has been recognized for over 2000 years. The question then becomes though, is it because of race, or is it because of the area they are concentrated in. Every legit study in the past 70 years has shown that it comes down to where someone lives as the main precursor to crime instead of their race. The non-minorities that live in those minority concentrated areas commit crime at the same rate the minorities there do. It is linked to education, income, employment, and family unit structure (though the family unit influence has been shown to have a decreasing effect on crime rates one way or another over the last 15-20 years) Your study admits that in SOME cities that is the case but not all: "We also found that the relationship between neighborhood racial/ethnic concentration and homicide was explained more by social disadvantage variables in some cities than in others." |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Aug 5, 2017 9:05:37 GMT -5
Backing up a point I made a long time ago. African Americans are concentrated in lower socio-economic areas. You can link their concentration to such areas. Once you break down the absolute numbers of the racial breakdown, the per capita of crime by race evens out. For instance, you have a concentration of AA in neighborhood 'X'. The actual #s are as followed 200 AA 50 Caucasian Breakdown of crime committed in that neighborhood by race 100 by AA (50% per capita AA) 25 by Caucasian (50% per capita white) They committed crimes at equal rates even though the concentration of the bloc was higher towards AA. I'm not disagreeing that the concentrated areas of minorities are where you find the most crime. That is the case everywhere in the world and that has been recognized for over 2000 years. The question then becomes though, is it because of race, or is it because of the area they are concentrated in. Every legit study in the past 70 years has shown that it comes down to where someone lives as the main precursor to crime instead of their race. The non-minorities that live in those minority concentrated areas commit crime at the same rate the minorities there do. It is linked to education, income, employment, and family unit structure (though the family unit influence has been shown to have a decreasing effect on crime rates one way or another over the last 15-20 years) Your study admits that in SOME cities that is the case but not all: "We also found that the relationship between neighborhood racial/ethnic concentration and homicide was explained more by social disadvantage variables in some cities than in others." They were referring to the degree of the relationship. The areas in which it wasn't explained, they were literally single-ethnic neighborhoods. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2017 9:18:55 GMT -5
Poor people are more involved with crime.
Black people are often poor because they were slaves and are genetically inclined to work for peanuts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2017 10:12:30 GMT -5
Your study admits that in SOME cities that is the case but not all: "We also found that the relationship between neighborhood racial/ethnic concentration and homicide was explained more by social disadvantage variables in some cities than in others." They were referring to the degree of the relationship. The areas in which it wasn't explained, they were literally single-ethnic neighborhoods. I love how you pull conclusions out of your ass... There are several variables for increased homicide rates and high percentage of African Americans is one of them but ignore that because in SOME cities socioeconomic factors and education can explain some discrepancies. It is one thing to troll just for shits and giggles but when a worthless human being does nothing but troll because he holds no value to society, it is pathetic. Hint: I'm calling you a pathetic worthless human. Just so you aren't confused on what my conclusion is... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2017 11:10:34 GMT -5
For years this guy has been wasting your time. Why bother responding?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2017 11:20:29 GMT -5
For years this guy has been wasting your time. Why bother responding? The future senator from Michigan might be able to explain it.... |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 5, 2017 13:02:53 GMT -5
Meanwhile in Europe...   |
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Aug 5, 2017 14:00:21 GMT -5
What's up with the picture of the phone? Report people that crossed the line....but it was nice to meet you at the gym? Confused |
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Aug 5, 2017 15:02:50 GMT -5
Crime causes poverty more than poverty causes crime
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 5, 2017 16:08:32 GMT -5
What's up with the picture of the phone? Report people that crossed the line....but it was nice to meet you at the gym? Confused Europe apparently has a problem with right wing extremists... they want you to call the cops if you see one or a group of them...at the gym. Apparently they'll be easy to spot because only right wing extremists go to the gym in Europe... everyone else is either a 7 year old refugee or a crooked toothed pansy. |
|
|
|
Post by daywork on Aug 5, 2017 17:54:32 GMT -5
What's up with the picture of the phone? Report people that crossed the line....but it was nice to meet you at the gym? Confused Europe apparently has a problem with right wing extremists... they want you to call the cops if you see one or a group of them...at the gym. Apparently they'll be easy to spot because only right wing extremists go to the gym in Europe... everyone else is either a 7 year old refugee or a crooked toothed pansy. I didn't know what the phone thing meant either. Thanks for letting us know.
Its kind of funny if you think about it. They want you to call the cops if you think someone might be a right wing extremist. But don't want you to speak about the refugee that just raped or robbed someone. Oh and let Antifa do and damage as they please.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Aug 5, 2017 18:28:34 GMT -5
If this lawsuit against the GOP for not following thru on their platform probably won't hold up, but I hope it does. Then maybe we can start having some accountability for the politicians vote in a way that actually affects them, their pockets.
|
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Aug 5, 2017 18:31:15 GMT -5
What's up with the picture of the phone? Report people that crossed the line....but it was nice to meet you at the gym? Confused Europe apparently has a problem with right wing extremists... they want you to call the cops if you see one or a group of them...at the gym. Apparently they'll be easy to spot because only right wing extremists go to the gym in Europe... everyone else is either a 7 year old refugee or a crooked toothed pansy. "if you see one or a group of them...at the gym" Lol. Spilled my drink with that one. |
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Aug 6, 2017 0:09:03 GMT -5
Crime causes poverty more than poverty causes crime Tying crime to poverty and then washing our hands of the matter as a simple function of economics is just too goddamned convenient. Globally, there are plenty of INCREDIBLY impoverished peoples that are virtually without crime. There are heavy cultural and social-dynamic components to crime and the agitation of high crime populations and regions that supersede mere dollars and sense, though that does appear to be a significant contributor. |
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Aug 6, 2017 0:15:33 GMT -5
"Judicial Watch has sent a letter to California Secretary of State Alex Padilla on behalf of the Election Integrity Project, noting that at least 11 of the 58 counties in the state have more registered voters than citizens of voting age per the US census."
|
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Aug 6, 2017 0:26:44 GMT -5
t.co/RXM7mJIwM5t.co/RXM7mJIwM5I mean . . . what sort of fucking . . . buffonery . . . what sort of . . . self-loathing, culture-loathing, self-destructive madness . . . are we immersed in here? Between this and the Islam fetish . . . do we even deserve to win?
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 6, 2017 0:39:10 GMT -5
Europe apparently has a problem with right wing extremists... they want you to call the cops if you see one or a group of them...at the gym. Apparently they'll be easy to spot because only right wing extremists go to the gym in Europe... everyone else is either a 7 year old refugee or a crooked toothed pansy. "if you see one or a group of them...at the gym" Lol. Spilled my drink with that one. Europe would lock us up for the shit we post here, haha. |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 6, 2017 0:55:14 GMT -5
t.co/RXM7mJIwM5t.co/RXM7mJIwM5I mean . . . what sort of fucking . . . buffonery . . . what sort of . . . self-loathing, culture-loathing, self-destructive madness . . . are we immersed in here? Between this and the Islam fetish . . . do we even deserve to win? Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by CaveBearOG on Aug 6, 2017 3:22:05 GMT -5
I fucking relapsed I mean Jesus Christ I think Kyle is right I'm weak...jesus
|
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Aug 6, 2017 4:43:53 GMT -5
I fucking relapsed I mean Jesus Christ I think Kyle is right I'm weak...jesus What about trying to go mostly off the grid? Find yourself a cheap 100$ acre in the middle of nowhere that has access to ISP/Electric lines. Order two 40' shipping containers (2k each) but throw them together and build a house out of them so you can mortgage it out dirt cheap. Travel into town for shopping like once or twice a week. Just basically for 6 months to a year stick to that and a non-drug hobby. Maybe find a spot of land that near a pond you can fish in. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2017 5:49:06 GMT -5
t.co/RXM7mJIwM5t.co/RXM7mJIwM5I mean . . . what sort of fucking . . . buffonery . . . what sort of . . . self-loathing, culture-loathing, self-destructive madness . . . are we immersed in here? Between this and the Islam fetish . . . do we even deserve to win? Well, if we put them together the Muslim would probably throw him off a roof. #Tolerant |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2017 5:49:52 GMT -5
I fucking relapsed I mean Jesus Christ I think Kyle is right I'm weak...jesus What did you do? |
|
|
|
Post by CaveBearOG on Aug 6, 2017 9:11:59 GMT -5
I fucking relapsed I mean Jesus Christ I think Kyle is right I'm weak...jesus What did you do? Alcohol. |
|
|
|
Post by CaveBearOG on Aug 6, 2017 9:14:07 GMT -5
I fucking relapsed I mean Jesus Christ I think Kyle is right I'm weak...jesus What about trying to go mostly off the grid? Find yourself a cheap 100$ acre in the middle of nowhere that has access to ISP/Electric lines. Order two 40' shipping containers (2k each) but throw them together and build a house out of them so you can mortgage it out dirt cheap. Travel into town for shopping like once or twice a week. Just basically for 6 months to a year stick to that and a non-drug hobby. Maybe find a spot of land that near a pond you can fish in. You ooze stupid k |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2017 10:01:13 GMT -5
Might help if you stop staring your demon in the face with all the "I get wasted" memes on FB. You keep letting your addictions define you CB. To the point that you seek agreement from the crowd that all you are is a wastoid. You can be more than that if you want to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by daywork on Aug 6, 2017 10:32:27 GMT -5
"Judicial Watch has sent a letter to California Secretary of State Alex Padilla on behalf of the Election Integrity Project, noting that at least 11 of the 58 counties in the state have more registered voters than citizens of voting age per the US census." Did those extra registered voters vote? If so, who did they vote for?
Edit. I read up on it. It doesn't say if they voted or not. Just that the voter rolls are a mess.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2017 10:42:41 GMT -5
I fucking relapsed I mean Jesus Christ I think Kyle is right I'm weak...jesus So get the hell up again and start another sober streak. |
|
