Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2017 12:07:03 GMT -5
I don't know who this new guys is . . . but, I like him already. Some focus mitt practice on CNN's virtue signaling dunce in the front row here. Really great shit. Bill Maher is back on tomorrow. I wonder if he'll talk about this and put his spin on it. Jesus I wish Jim would shut the fuck up. It was a hilarious turn when he called out Cosmopolitan bias. Lol. Only thing I would have liked more is if he said, "Jim, d ont ask me a question and then talk over me. IF you can't just shut the fuck up and wait for my answer then get out." |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 3, 2017 12:15:19 GMT -5
So you're saying we need to end the welfare system that enables and contributes to the crime-culture in the black communities? Because when I look up crime stats like 90 percent of these violent robberies scenarios are perpetrated by blacks... www.amren.com/news/2015/07/new-doj-statistics-on-race-and-violent-crime/www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/If we lower the percentage for bat wounds to the head, we lower healthcare costs as well. Next we can ban the purchase of soda and other non essential foods with the use of food stamps...eliminating diabetes and obesity that plagues the health system. Now, do you see how ending unearned entitlements should be the first option prior to simply forcing everyone to hand over their money? How about: car wrecks, heart attacks, cancer, genetic disorders, accidents in general, other heart disease, or stroke? You think you are a healthy something year old and boom, any of those things could happen to any of us without us having the first clue. I'm sure the money saved after we solve these problems will more than cover your "what if" scenarios. Solve the problem first...don't perpetuate it by adding more taxes. |
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Aug 3, 2017 12:18:05 GMT -5
Morning Joe working overtime not to be a cunt, all of a sudden: thelibertarianrepublic.com/scarborough-says-acostas-words-sounded-like-something-mein-kampf/“Where things seem to really melt down was when Jim Acosta talked, and we’re not, we’re certainly not putting this on Jim Acosta … but when Jim Acosta used the language, that it seems like your polices are trying to engineer racial and ethnic percentages or something, it sure sounded like something that you would read out of like ‘Mein Kampf or something,” Scarborough said. CNN White House Correspondent Jim Acosta debated with senior White House adviser Stephen Miller over concerns that the Trump administration would discriminate and try to push social engineering. Acosta raised concerns that immigrants from English speaking countries like Great Britain and Australia would get preferential treatment, while minority communities would be marginalized. Miller shot back, accusing Acosta of ignorance to think that only people from Great Britain and Australia speak English. Commentary magazine editor and “Morning Joe” panelist John Podhoretz mocked Acosta’s reference to the Statue of Liberty and said, “Having a reporter yammer at a White House official by quoting Emma Lazarus’ poem at the base of the State of Liberty as though that’s the basis for policy, something written in 1883, we’re living in 2017 … it was so obnoxious.” Scarborough said Acosta’s accusations were “something we would have accused the Serbs of doing back in the 1990’s. At that point it went off the rails.” Washington Examiner Columnist Tim Carney added, “This is why people hate the press.” |
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Aug 3, 2017 12:42:10 GMT -5
Just spent the last 10 min reading liberal reactions to this Jim Accosta/Stephen Miller exchange . . . folks, we're not even living on the same planet with 1/2 the population. I don't even know what they're talking about, what they watched, literally came away with a fundamentally different concept of what happened and what it means. Zero frame of reference upon which we could discuss this constructively. Zero. Also, a good half-a-dozen nazi comments.
They're actually out there sharing this same clip and all up in arms about how crazy and racist and ignorant . . . MILLER is. They're using this as evidence of white supremacy and nefarious agendas in the administration.
We've got two sides of an ideological coin . . . both using the same event as an example of a clear cut win. I'm . . . fucking baffled. Fucking baffled.
There's just . . . no point, anymore. It's not gonna happen. Whatever you thought was gonna happen, maybe, one day, it ain't gonna happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2017 12:57:43 GMT -5
How about: car wrecks, heart attacks, cancer, genetic disorders, accidents in general, other heart disease, or stroke? You think you are a healthy something year old and boom, any of those things could happen to any of us without us having the first clue. I'm sure the money saved after we solve these problems will more than cover your "what if" scenarios. Solve the problem first...don't perpetuate it by adding more taxes. You think fixing entitlements will somehow solve our healthcare issues? You are dodging my fundamental argument of how somebody could be my body, my choice and still agree with making sure people have health insurance. Where are the rally cries to stop requiring liability insurance? Also, heart disease and stroke are two of the top 5 leading causes of death and disability so I doubt your suggestions would save enough money to cover the what ifs I brought up. Me personally, I think insurance is one of the huge reasons we have astronomical healthcare costs and we should work towards getting rid of it and replacing it with catastrophic insurance and concierge medicine. I was just pointing out there is a legitimate argument for taxing those who opt out of healthcare coverage even if that isn't my primary choice to help fix the system. |
|
|
|
Post by MMAJim on Aug 3, 2017 13:15:37 GMT -5
I'm sure the money saved after we solve these problems will more than cover your "what if" scenarios. Solve the problem first...don't perpetuate it by adding more taxes. You think fixing entitlements will somehow solve our healthcare issues? You are dodging my fundamental argument of how somebody could be my body, my choice and still agree with making sure people have health insurance. Where are the rally cries to stop requiring liability insurance? Also, heart disease and stroke are two of the top 5 leading causes of death and disability so I doubt your suggestions would save enough money to cover the what ifs I brought up. Me personally, I think insurance is one of the huge reasons we have astronomical healthcare costs and we should work towards getting rid of it and replacing it with catastrophic insurance and concierge medicine. I was just pointing out there is a legitimate argument for taxing those who opt out of healthcare coverage even if that isn't my primary choice to help fix the system. Not to dive in sideways here, but liability insurance actually makes perfect sense. If you are driving, conducting business, etc., and you f-up, liability insurance covers both your fortune and more importantly the public when you are liable for their loss. No requirement for liability insurance essentially would mean, you're young dumb and full of bad driving, and your net worth is $0.00, you are still held minimumly responsible (depending on the state) for reimbursing those you have injured or caused a loss. If you had $0, and zero insurance, those people are f'd. Basically, since it affects the public, there may be a legit reason to require it. Health insurance, less clear on how it affects the public (other than the assumption that people just go to emergency care and get it paid for by the public, but there are multiple ways to interpret that issue.) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2017 14:35:31 GMT -5
You think fixing entitlements will somehow solve our healthcare issues? You are dodging my fundamental argument of how somebody could be my body, my choice and still agree with making sure people have health insurance. Where are the rally cries to stop requiring liability insurance? Also, heart disease and stroke are two of the top 5 leading causes of death and disability so I doubt your suggestions would save enough money to cover the what ifs I brought up. Me personally, I think insurance is one of the huge reasons we have astronomical healthcare costs and we should work towards getting rid of it and replacing it with catastrophic insurance and concierge medicine. I was just pointing out there is a legitimate argument for taxing those who opt out of healthcare coverage even if that isn't my primary choice to help fix the system. Not to dive in sideways here, but liability insurance actually makes perfect sense. If you are driving, conducting business, etc., and you f-up, liability insurance covers both your fortune and more importantly the public when you are liable for their loss. No requirement for liability insurance essentially would mean, you're young dumb and full of bad driving, and your net worth is $0.00, you are still held minimumly responsible (depending on the state) for reimbursing those you have injured or caused a loss. If you had $0, and zero insurance, those people are f'd. Basically, since it affects the public, there may be a legit reason to require it. Health insurance, less clear on how it affects the public (other than the assumption that people just go to emergency care and get it paid for by the public, but there are multiple ways to interpret that issue.) Oh, I agree with you on liability insurance but I find that there is a pretty clear connection between uninsured and increased healthcare costs. |
|
|
|
Post by PatSox on Aug 3, 2017 15:34:55 GMT -5
Not to dive in sideways here  |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Aug 3, 2017 16:47:44 GMT -5
So the second picture can be argued two ways. You can say my body, my choice and still be for taxing those without insurance and here is how: it can be argued that not having health insurance affects everyone. Just like it is required to have liability insurance for their car, some would say health insurance is liability insurance. IF you choose not to have health insurance and get hit in the dome by person robbing you, end up with a brain bleed, ventilated, and spend 2 months in the ICU. You decided not to have insurance but through no fault of your own you have a 3 million dollar bill that you can't pay. The hospital is out 3 million and now have to make up their losses elsewhere which drives prices up for everyone. Using a deterrent, the government forces you to have insurance and the hospital recoup some losses. So you're saying we need to end the welfare system that enables and contributes to the crime-culture in the black communities? Because when I look up crime stats like 90 percent of these violent robberies scenarios are perpetrated by blacks... That statistic is so misleading though. A more accurate way to look at is twofold since the problem isn't actually race but geographic/socio-economic. 1. Using statistics to single out the crime-culture communities are, then.. 2. Looking at the racial statistics of the offenders within those areas. When you do that you come up with two conclusions on the race side depending on the neighborhood 1. Race turns out not to matter, the crimes are being committed pretty equally per capita among the races. 2. Some crimes in those areas, have Caucasians committing at a higher per capita rate. For instance auto theft. And then finally you are able to see that race isn't the underlying issue for crimes, but the communities themselves are. In part because of a culture that has taken hold over decades, but more so because of lack of reliable education, work, and security. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2017 0:21:34 GMT -5
Fuck me... this state is so fucked up it makes me want to scratch my eyeballs out. The leadership here is out of control and the only reason the state hasn't collapsed is because of it's immense natural resources, weather, and scenery. You guys always tell me that Carlson is great at making people look stupid because he really knows what he's talking about and cuts through all their bullcrap, but based on just about every clip of his show that's been posted here.......does he ever have any guests on that aren't raving idiots to begin with? Hell, I could be a great basketball player, but if all I do is beat a bunch of midgets and paraplegics 21-0, what exactly am I accomplishing? I have seen Carlsons show maybe twice, and both of those time were less than half of his show. Not sure what he has on nightly, however this guy on this clip in particular actually speaks for lots of people here. There is a large population in this state that wants no southern border, and taxes in the 70% range with everything being socialized. |
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Aug 4, 2017 3:27:59 GMT -5
So you're saying we need to end the welfare system that enables and contributes to the crime-culture in the black communities? Because when I look up crime stats like 90 percent of these violent robberies scenarios are perpetrated by blacks... That statistic is so misleading though. A more accurate way to look at is twofold since the problem isn't actually race but geographic/socio-economic. 1. Using statistics to single out the crime-culture communities are, then.. 2. Looking at the racial statistics of the offenders within those areas. When you do that you come up with two conclusions on the race side depending on the neighborhood 1. Race turns out not to matter, the crimes are being committed pretty equally per capita among the races. 2. Some crimes in those areas, have Caucasians committing at a higher per capita rate. For instance auto theft. And then finally you are able to see that race isn't the underlying issue for crimes, but the communities themselves are. In part because of a culture that has taken hold over decades, but more so because of lack of reliable education, work, and security. This is all bullshit. Find me an impoverished white area with car theft, robbery, and murder on a scale in the same universe as any black area, please. Don't harken to statistics that don't exist |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Aug 4, 2017 3:53:33 GMT -5
That statistic is so misleading though. A more accurate way to look at is twofold since the problem isn't actually race but geographic/socio-economic. 1. Using statistics to single out the crime-culture communities are, then.. 2. Looking at the racial statistics of the offenders within those areas. When you do that you come up with two conclusions on the race side depending on the neighborhood 1. Race turns out not to matter, the crimes are being committed pretty equally per capita among the races. 2. Some crimes in those areas, have Caucasians committing at a higher per capita rate. For instance auto theft. And then finally you are able to see that race isn't the underlying issue for crimes, but the communities themselves are. In part because of a culture that has taken hold over decades, but more so because of lack of reliable education, work, and security. This is all bullshit. Find me an impoverished white area with car theft, robbery, and murder on a scale in the same universe as any black area, please. Don't harken to statistics that don't exist What do you mean an impoverished white area? The race has nothing to do with it. If you look at where crime in concentrated, and you look at where criminals who commit crimes outside those areas tend to come from, take those neighborhoods THEN look at the race and you see per capita pretty even. Black, White, Brown, Yellow, it don't matter. We are human, we suck. We live in those areas we are likely to become criminals. You think the impoverished crime-originating neighborhoods are 100% black? Talk about a cosmopolitan attitude. |
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Aug 4, 2017 4:03:11 GMT -5
This is all bullshit. Find me an impoverished white area with car theft, robbery, and murder on a scale in the same universe as any black area, please. Don't harken to statistics that don't exist What do you mean an impoverished white area? The race has nothing to do with it. If you look at where crime in concentrated, and you look at where criminals who commit crimes outside those areas tend to come from, take those neighborhoods THEN look at the race and you see per capita pretty even. Black, White, Brown, Yellow, it don't matter. We are human, we suck. We live in those areas we are likely to become criminals. You think the impoverished crime-originating neighborhoods are 100% black? Talk about a cosmopolitan attitude. Sorry bub. It is s common myth, but a myth, that poor whites commit crimes at comparable rates to poor blacks. It's simply not true. If you want to pursue this debate, it will end, as usual, with you looking bad |
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Aug 4, 2017 6:26:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Aug 4, 2017 7:43:52 GMT -5
What do you mean an impoverished white area? The race has nothing to do with it. If you look at where crime in concentrated, and you look at where criminals who commit crimes outside those areas tend to come from, take those neighborhoods THEN look at the race and you see per capita pretty even. Black, White, Brown, Yellow, it don't matter. We are human, we suck. We live in those areas we are likely to become criminals. You think the impoverished crime-originating neighborhoods are 100% black? Talk about a cosmopolitan attitude. Sorry bub. It is s common myth, but a myth, that poor whites commit crimes at comparable rates to poor blacks. It's simply not true. If you want to pursue this debate, it will end, as usual, with you looking bad If I still had my materials from school I'd list off the dozen of studies that prove you wrong. Instead, a quick google to show you... www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527429/which in part shows when you adjust for socio-economic situation of the area (unemployment, income, education, etc...) it pretty much evens out. Early on in the article it references multiple studies that have shown that in the past too. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2017 8:52:00 GMT -5
Last night I broke out my new 18 inch triple percolated bong and a new strain called Gorilla Glue.
Then I listened to Ben Shapiro on Rogan's podcast for 3 hours straight.
I woke up this morning convinced I was smarter than everyone, not because I'm wicked smart, but because everyone else is really really dumb.
Then I realized I had a weed hangover. So I went back to sleep. I woke up and realized I'm just as dumb as everyone else. And Ben Shapiro would probably take my lunch money in a debate on any topic beside marijuana. But he agrees all drugs should be legalized.
For a minute last night when I was listening to 33 year old Ben Shapiro talk, I had an idea that he just might be a savior for the libertarian party. A lot of his positions really lean in that direction. He even went off on a tangent about how the federal government should be stripped of most of its power and how the president as well as Congress should have a lot of their powers stripped so that people don't care so much about National political theater.
That guy thinks fast, speaks fast, and has an amazing command of the facts in his head.
Gary Johnson? Give me a fucking break. Put Ben Shapiro up on stage as the third candidate in a debate. Just imagine what he would have done to both Hillary and Trump if given the opportunity.
Forget electing the first woman. I think it's time we elected a Jew.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Aug 4, 2017 10:28:38 GMT -5
Ben on the Rogan podcast this week was really, really good . . . and further explored the depths of Rogan's conservatism, which is a little surprising. And he's not actually a conservative, as in a republican, or conservative like Ben is, but he's conservative culturally (Joe Rogan, the pot head Hollywood meditation hippy?). Yeah, that guy. Liberalism has gotten so fucking luny that Joe Rogan is not considered strongly conservative and regularly gets tons of hate male for refusing to be pulled into the tranny warrior, racial paranoia, victim junkie world of modern liberalism.
They get into some great conversations on the recent podcast on a variety of these topics and Joe makes a ton of sense and I hope his audience is of some 30 million total listeners, if . . . well, listening.
Here's a weird curveball: Joe Rogan might be the single most important figure in the current culture war.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2017 10:50:14 GMT -5
I tjink after the Shapiro episode, my girl is starting realize why I get worked up a bit when we have to hang out with hardcore liberal friends and family of ours. I'm not with the anti white rhetoric and I'm not sorry that I don't like to keep my mouth shut.
I am mellow on social media in this regards, id much rather have these convos while looking at the other person.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2017 10:58:24 GMT -5
Ben on the Rogan podcast this week was really, really good . . . and further explored the depths of Rogan's conservatism, which is a little surprising. And he's not actually a conservative, as in a republican, or conservative like Ben is, but he's conservative culturally (Joe Rogan, the pot head Hollywood meditation hippy?). Yeah, that guy. Liberalism has gotten so fucking luny that Joe Rogan is not considered strongly conservative and regularly gets tons of hate male for refusing to be pulled into the tranny warrior, racial paranoia, victim junkie world of modern liberalism. They get into some great conversations on the recent podcast on a variety of these topics and Joe makes a ton of sense and I hope his audience is of some 30 million total listeners, if . . . well, listening. Here's a weird curveball: Joe Rogan might be the single most important figure in the current culture war. The thing that I really like about Rogan is that he's open to pretty much anything. He'll listen, and then if something's weird- he points out how it's weird. He doesn't get caught up in his own positions to the point that he will defend something that is illogical. I think it's possible that Joe Rogan's pragmatic approach to stuff gets overlooked because of all of the other distractions like his positions on drugs, and other subjects that are generally taboo to discuss, that he just straight-up discusses. The story he told about being in Manhattan and listening to some crazy man on the sidewalk chanting about Donald Trump being a part of the KKK and Nazis and blah blah blah who completely changed his chanting to yelling that black lives matter when a black person approached was hilarious. And so accurate. Such a strong encapsulation of what is actually happening in this country right now. Too many people are allowing their actual identity to be based on their political perspectives and feelings and leanings. To the point where they feel the need to Virtue signal as much as they possibly can. Joe Rogan is really an excellent conversationalist. One of the things that is always a concern when Ben is a guest on a show is that Ben is going to run roughshod over whomever he's talking with. But that didn't happen with Rogan at all. He held his own, even though I don't think there was much they disagreed on at all. And as you said Baph, that was a little surprising. But you're right, Ben showed Rogan's conservative tendencies. A good few questions would be, has Rogan moved more to the right? Or has the left gone so fucking crazy that they actually moved the line, and Rogan isn't the one who moved at all? I think Rogan has always been one of those people who seek out as many perspectives on a topic as they can get. I think that he is someone who will change his position if facts show him that he was mistaken. But with all of this societal upheaval, I don't think there have been many people who have come forward from the left who can present Rogan with facts that change his perspective to the point where he will agree with the crazy people who want to drag him into the stupid groupthink based social causes that have pervaded the left to the point that it seems borderline insane. He comes across as a rational, curious, and intelligent person. Generally the extreme ideologies of either wing are not going to appeal to someone like Joe Rogan. So I would agree that his importance should not be understated. He calls a spade a spade for the most part, he has an understanding of logic and he relies on it to call out bullshit. And fortunately he has a microphone that has a lot of people listening to it. I would recommend that Shapiro podcast to everyone who wants to hear rational and solid discussion that actually leans in the direction of conservatism, and makes a whole bunch of sense. The first time I've ever listened to a 3 Hour podcast all the way through. But those two guys have a conversation worth listening to. I hope they do it again. |
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on Aug 4, 2017 11:15:40 GMT -5
What do you mean an impoverished white area? The race has nothing to do with it. If you look at where crime in concentrated, and you look at where criminals who commit crimes outside those areas tend to come from, take those neighborhoods THEN look at the race and you see per capita pretty even. Black, White, Brown, Yellow, it don't matter. We are human, we suck. We live in those areas we are likely to become criminals. You think the impoverished crime-originating neighborhoods are 100% black? Talk about a cosmopolitan attitude. Sorry bub. It is s common myth, but a myth, that poor whites commit crimes at comparable rates to poor blacks. It's simply not true. If you want to pursue this debate, it will end, as usual, with you looking bad He's so stupid he posted a study proving you are correct yet he lacks the basic intelligent to understand the study. Can't believe anyone still responds to that bumbling buffoon. |
|
|
|
Post by daywork on Aug 4, 2017 11:26:55 GMT -5
Ben on the Rogan podcast this week was really, really good . . . and further explored the depths of Rogan's conservatism, which is a little surprising. And he's not actually a conservative, as in a republican, or conservative like Ben is, but he's conservative culturally (Joe Rogan, the pot head Hollywood meditation hippy?). Yeah, that guy. Liberalism has gotten so fucking luny that Joe Rogan is not considered strongly conservative and regularly gets tons of hate male for refusing to be pulled into the tranny warrior, racial paranoia, victim junkie world of modern liberalism. They get into some great conversations on the recent podcast on a variety of these topics and Joe makes a ton of sense and I hope his audience is of some 30 million total listeners, if . . . well, listening. Here's a weird curveball: Joe Rogan might be the single most important figure in the current culture war. The thing that I really like about Rogan is that he's open to pretty much anything. He'll listen, and then if something's weird- he points out how it's weird. He doesn't get caught up in his own positions to the point that he will defend something that is illogical. I think it's possible that Joe Rogan's pragmatic approach to stuff gets overlooked because of all of the other distractions like his positions on drugs, and other subjects that are generally taboo to discuss, that he just straight-up discusses. The story he told about being in Manhattan and listening to some crazy man on the sidewalk chanting about Donald Trump being a part of the KKK and Nazis and blah blah blah who completely changed his chanting to yelling that black lives matter when a black person approached was hilarious. And so accurate. Such a strong encapsulation of what is actually happening in this country right now. Too many people are allowing their actual identity to be based on their political perspectives and feelings and leanings. To the point where they feel the need to Virtue signal as much as they possibly can. Joe Rogan is really an excellent conversationalist. One of the things that is always a concern when Ben is a guest on a show is that Ben is going to run roughshod over whomever he's talking with. But that didn't happen with Rogan at all. He held his own, even though I don't think there was much they disagreed on at all. And as you said Baph, that was a little surprising. But you're right, Ben showed Rogan's conservative tendencies. A good few questions would be, has Rogan moved more to the right? Or has the left gone so fucking crazy that they actually moved the line, and Rogan isn't the one who moved at all? I think Rogan has always been one of those people who seek out as many perspectives on a topic as they can get. I think that he is someone who will change his position if facts show him that he was mistaken. But with all of this societal upheaval, I don't think there have been many people who have come forward from the left who can present Rogan with facts that change his perspective to the point where he will agree with the crazy people who want to drag him into the stupid groupthink based social causes that have pervaded the left to the point that it seems borderline insane. He comes across as a rational, curious, and intelligent person. Generally the extreme ideologies of either wing are not going to appeal to someone like Joe Rogan. So I would agree that his importance should not be understated. He calls a spade a spade for the most part, he has an understanding of logic and he relies on it to call out bullshit. And fortunately he has a microphone that has a lot of people listening to it. I would recommend that Shapiro podcast to everyone who wants to hear rational and solid discussion that actually leans in the direction of conservatism, and makes a whole bunch of sense. The first time I've ever listened to a 3 Hour podcast all the way through. But those two guys have a conversation worth listening to. I hope they do it again. I didn't get a chance to watch all of it yet. I will finish watching the whole thing. What I did see was very good. I did notice Joe was agreeing with a lot of what Ben had to say. I wanted to see weed be brought up. I'm not sure what Ben's stance is on legal weed. I remember a episode where some guy (chowder or something like that) didn't think weed should be legal. Joe wigged out about it, just would not get off the subject.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2017 11:50:01 GMT -5
Ben says he thinks all drugs should be legalized. But that they are stupid. Rogan just moves on from the point. No fireworks there at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by daywork on Aug 4, 2017 11:52:11 GMT -5
Ben says he thinks all drugs should be legalized. But that they are stupid. Rogan just moves on from the point. No fireworks there at all. LOL Wow, hard to believe Joe just let that go. If you can, what the one with chowder?? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2017 12:03:50 GMT -5
I would prefer a 9mm be used |
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Aug 4, 2017 12:25:19 GMT -5
I would prefer a 9mm be used That will work. This is such bullshit though, eventually they are going to want the real thing and rape a child. |
|
|
|
Post by PatSox on Aug 4, 2017 14:55:56 GMT -5
I would prefer a 9mm be used That will work. This is such bullshit though, eventually they are going to want the real thing and rape a child. Yeah, but at least they'll be really good at it, after all that practice ........Okay, I think that was the most awful thing I've ever said |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2017 14:58:40 GMT -5
That will work. This is such bullshit though, eventually they are going to want the real thing and rape a child. Yeah, but at least they'll be really good at it, after all that practice ........Okay, I think that was the most awful thing I've ever said Gross but funny.... I laughed |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2017 16:37:54 GMT -5
Holy shit. The head of emissions development in the United States for Volkswagen just got hit with 11 felony charges over the emissions stuff. And he faces 169 years in prison. That on top of the billions Volkswagen had to pay back.
Seems like Volkswagen got hammered hard. But it's probably because they knew what they were doing as opposed to "unintentionally" installing defective parts that actually kill people.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Aug 4, 2017 16:47:26 GMT -5
Ben says he thinks all drugs should be legalized. But that they are stupid. Rogan just moves on from the point. No fireworks there at all. LOL Wow, hard to believe Joe just let that go. If you can, what the one with chowder?? That's how rational adults SHOULD debate and converse. Joe won the point. Why get into controlling the private thoughts and opinions of your opponent if the policy position is compatible with your own? That's the key difference (one of them, anyway) between us and the progressive zealots. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2017 19:02:52 GMT -5
Sorry bub. It is s common myth, but a myth, that poor whites commit crimes at comparable rates to poor blacks. It's simply not true. If you want to pursue this debate, it will end, as usual, with you looking bad If I still had my materials from school I'd list off the dozen of studies that prove you wrong. Instead, a quick google to show you... www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527429/which in part shows when you adjust for socio-economic situation of the area (unemployment, income, education, etc...) it pretty much evens out. Early on in the article it references multiple studies that have shown that in the past too. Lol. From your study: "Higher concentrations of African-American and Hispanics were associated with greater risk of being a homicide victim from 2003 to 2005 (Table 3, separate predictors). This was not the case in census block groups with a higher concentration of Asians and Caucasians." |
|
