|
Post by Baph on Feb 15, 2017 13:15:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Feb 15, 2017 13:31:47 GMT -5
I doubt Maher will let him talk.
|
|
|
Post by Fasthands25 on Feb 15, 2017 14:46:56 GMT -5
I doubt Maher will let him talk. Milo has shown he is good at shutting up his opponent. Someone get Joe Rogan here to do pre debate analysis!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 19:19:04 GMT -5
You know how this goes. Maher invites one conservative on his shows, and then loads up the dais with a bunch of liberals to support him. Hilarity ensues.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Feb 15, 2017 22:24:17 GMT -5
Milo is a master debater
I don't think they'll be able to verbally beat him up even if they load the panel with a liberal goof squad.
Should be fun, maybe I'll tune in.
|
|
|
Post by hammerfaust on Feb 16, 2017 0:09:50 GMT -5
The link Baph posted says Milo is the top of the show guest and will be a one on one segment with Maher. He won't be part of the panel.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Feb 16, 2017 0:18:49 GMT -5
The link Baph posted says Milo is the top of the show guest and will be a one on one segment with Maher. He won't be part of the panel. This is much better. then we get to skip through the peanut gallery bullshit and have a legit debate. I'm sold.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Feb 16, 2017 5:50:25 GMT -5
The link Baph posted says Milo is the top of the show guest and will be a one on one segment with Maher. He won't be part of the panel. This is much better. then we get to skip through the peanut gallery bullshit and have a legit debate. I'm sold. Well some liberal douche has cancelled being on Maher on Friday because he said he didnt want to participate in the panel with Milo, so maybe Milo will do both.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2017 9:21:42 GMT -5
Yeah the liberal douche Slaytan is talking about wrote this big long diatribe about how Milo incites violence and all this other bullshit. It was shocking to read because I've followed Milo so closely. It was mostly lies. Straight up, unadulterated lies. The funny part about it was the he wrote this big long thing explaining why he wasn't going to show up to debate Milo. But knowing that everything he was saying was a big load of bullshit, made it very clear what this guy's deal actually is. He's a pussy, who is against free speech but lacks the intellect to effectively argue his position. I haven't watched Bill Maher in a long time. I will definitely be recording this. If they let Milo on the panel, it's going to be something to watch. He will decimate most of the clowns in Bill Maher's circus. Looking forward to watching that.
|
|
|
Post by hammerfaust on Feb 16, 2017 9:31:24 GMT -5
This is much better. then we get to skip through the peanut gallery bullshit and have a legit debate. I'm sold. Well some liberal douche has cancelled being on Maher on Friday because he said he didnt want to participate in the panel with Milo, so maybe Milo will do both. Holy crap... does anyone actually read anymore? Baph's link has all the answers: Real Time has replaced Scahill with Malcolm Nance, author of The Plot to Hack America: How Putin’s Cyberspies and WikiLeaks Tried to Steal the 2016 Election. Yiannopoulos is set to appear as the top-of-show guest, a one-on-one segment with Maher, and so won’t share the stage or debate with other guests.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Feb 16, 2017 14:11:27 GMT -5
Well some liberal douche has cancelled being on Maher on Friday because he said he didnt want to participate in the panel with Milo, so maybe Milo will do both. Holy crap... does anyone actually read anymore? Baph's link has all the answers: Real Time has replaced Scahill with Malcolm Nance, author of The Plot to Hack America: How Putin’s Cyberspies and WikiLeaks Tried to Steal the 2016 Election. Yiannopoulos is set to appear as the top-of-show guest, a one-on-one segment with Maher, and so won’t share the stage or debate with other guests.Very happy to read this...emphathis on read. ; ) So it's good to see that they're replacing the liberal nutter that dropped off the show due to Milo's appearance with an accomplished fiction novelist.
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Feb 16, 2017 16:22:24 GMT -5
Not sure if there's a bigger shark in the ocean right now than Milo. If you're a liberal echo chamber type, ego drunk celeb, snarky media hack, this dude is the stuff nightmares are made of. Gay, British, highly intelligent and in command of the issues, lightning quick wit, immersed in open forum argument and counter point, and funny, but also aggressive and confident, tactical, and he's here to win, not to make friends. While you've been circle jerking at the Polo club, he's been on a national campus tour raining hellfire in the trenches of progressive dogma farms, and his blade is sharpened on the blood of conquest. You ready, Meryl Streep? You ready, Ben Afflec? Spoiler alert: Not a fucking chance. And if you reduce yourself to college campus style shouting, you've just tipped your hand on a national stage that you're incapable of answering the bell, counter arguing, making the case for your side, and in the face of articulation and rational argument, you chose to scream at a gay immigrant in an inter-racial relationship because you're a fucking toddler that needs a nap and the safe spaces you've been coddled in never exposed you to self examination, scrutiny, or vigorous exchange of ideas . . . you know . . . democracy and shit.
I'd probably back out of the panel too. Cuddle up in my fave Che shirt and re-watch the Emmy's. The real world . . . it's dangerous out here.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Feb 16, 2017 17:08:48 GMT -5
I like reading Milo a lot better than watching him, but I will watch. Sad that to be a real conservative, one has to have layers of force field. Milo needs to be a fag, and he needs to go further and declare that he loves big black dicks up the ass. Otherwise he would be universally recognized as a white supremacist and completely marginalized. But Milo agrees with the above, and I love him for that. I read his stuff a long time (relatively) before I heard him. You may remember this gem I posted around a year ago www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/21/scientists-who-are-actually-really-stupid-1-neil-degrasse-tyson/
|
|
|
Post by matt on Feb 16, 2017 20:07:04 GMT -5
I like reading Milo a lot better than watching him, but I will watch. Sad that to be a real conservative, one has to have layers of force field. Milo needs to be a fag, and he needs to go further and declare that he loves big black dicks up the ass. Otherwise he would be universally recognized as a white supremacist and completely marginalized. But Milo agrees with the above, and I love him for that. I read his stuff a long time (relatively) before I heard him. You may remember this gem I posted around a year ago www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/21/scientists-who-are-actually-really-stupid-1-neil-degrasse-tyson/So true. The PC, anti white agenda has come to a boiling point to where you have to be an extreme homo just to have your voice heard. Basically, you can't be a straight white capatalist in the US these days without fear of a societal backlash against you. And even thought milo is a member of the ever so persecuted lgbtq group, he still gets violent riots to keep him from speaking. Maybe if he went full transgender they'd let him speak, who knows.
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Feb 18, 2017 0:47:26 GMT -5
Went very well. Milo was funny and smart, found a lot of common ground with Maher, who compared him to a young, gay, alive Christopher Hitchens. Milo was incredibly fast and just kind of "stream of consciousness" takes command of any/every topic Maher moved into, and Maher looked over-matched the entire time, either resolving to agree or to "move on" when there was dispute but articulation of the counter point was too cumbersome and unclear and slow. You simply cannot debate Milo unless you OWN the topic, own the stats, and have polished your delivery multiple times under pressure, because he will Gatling gun your ass into powder. In Over Time, the panel of dipshits offered up predictably infantile virtue signaling and cut downs, asking Milo if he was confused about his sexuality and how are you the face of the Nazi party and "go fuck yourself" for calling Leslie Jones illiterate. Just boring. When did the left become so fucking boring? Regardless, the world got a glimpse of this big boogey man over whom one of the original guests backed out in protest, a man whom campuses have gone up in flames over, Darth fucking Vader, and . . . yeah . . . he's a none of that at all and now you look like buffoons . . . again . . . for crying wolf . . . again . . . over a regular dude, a satirist, flaming gay, well spoken, advocating for important values of unfettered expression and open criticism, and I think Maher at least was clearly won over to a large degree. Milo even got spatterings of applause on a few occasions.
|
|
|
Post by ToNoAvail on Feb 18, 2017 1:21:22 GMT -5
Just watched.
I never watch Maher. I think he's one of the most smug, cocksuckiest people on the planet, but I was interested in this.
I'm not familiar with his show these days So I was unsure of the format but by the end, I was disappointed this was only a short, 10 minute debate. Went pretty well, a healthy mutual respect seemed to have kept the train on the tracks. I would have loved for this to have been a good 30 minutes or so. 10 minutes was just pitter patter really. Needs to be longer to be legitimately and measurably constructive.
|
|
|
Post by boboplata on Feb 18, 2017 5:37:03 GMT -5
Just watched. I never watch Maher. I think he's one of the most smug, cocksuckiest people on the planet, but I was interested in this. I'm not familiar with his show these days So I was unsure of the format but by the end, I was disappointed this was only a short, 10 minute debate. Went pretty well, a healthy mutual respect seemed to have kept the train on the tracks. I would have loved for this to have been a good 30 minutes or so. 10 minutes was just pitter patter really. Needs to be longer to be legitimately and measurably constructive. Everyone wants Milo deep inside of them.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Feb 18, 2017 7:30:10 GMT -5
Watched part, but then I guess there was a power loss or something and the DVR recording stopped. Seemed like they weren't debating anything really. Like Maher was afraid to go full liberocommie on him. They do agree on Islam, which is fine. I got it re recording today. Very disappointed that Milo wont be appearing on the panel, but if he were Larry Wilmore would almost certainly would have cowered away from coming on. I want to see him on a panel with John Oliver, Trevor Noah, and Glen Beck, but none of those douches would ever agree to it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2017 12:21:19 GMT -5
Haven't watched it yet but will check it out this evening.
Last couple weeks, when hanging out with my friends that like to play the liberal game...I've purposely put on Milo on Rogan Podcast for background. Ive found that while most know his name, they have never seen him or heard him speak.
My one buddy who unfortunately is rather quick to label shit with a -phobic, -ism, -ist, etc...Milo was right around the part on Rogan where he talks about having a gay pride parade through the streets of a Muslim slum in Sweden. My buddy, like I figured he would, goes, "who is this guy? He's fucking great"
I like to fuck with my buddy over this shit, he's a good guy just had a silver spoon up his ass and never really had to be exposed to the real world. Long story. But when I very mellowly said "yeah, he's great. Too bad he wasn't allowed to speak at Berkley". My buddy got quiet for a moment. I continued "I don't see what the problem was. You'd think he'd be a hit with the Berkley crowd". My buddy was still quiet, he was mesmerized by Milo, lol. Now granted, we were puffing some top notch OG''s, but I wound up stripping and cleaning my 1911 and a rifle while he sat there and watched about an hour of Milo. I don't like to push it too far, so I eventually changed it to some music and we wound up talking about a bunch of other random shit.
About 2am my phone blows up with texts. My buddy...he had been up for hours just watching milo. That's a lot more than I've ever seen of the guy myself lol. I don't want to say he changed his mind as that would have been some drastic shit...but he had to come to agreement that the guy should have been given his right to speak. Turns out he only knew the name through the left crazy shit websites. Never bothered to watch a clip, never bothered to do anything but scan an opinion piece by the guy years back and just coined him as the devil.
I know I'm straying from this thread but...Milo is very misunderstood imo. If you don't actually listen to what he says and let these sites break it down for you in small sound bytes and quotes, you will never even come close to comprehending what he is trying to get across.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2017 12:25:29 GMT -5
The overtime thing was pretty telling. That Larry Whatever guy basically demonstrated the standard response from the left, when facts do not corroborate their position. They just tell you to fuck off or go fuck yourself or whatever.
Also, the other black guy on the panel- sorry, but if you were that important in counter terrorism, you aren't ever going to be on Real Time With Bill Maher.
I thought it went well, but it is clear that Maher was also trying to drag Milo through the mud a bit by getting into it about the Leslie Jones bullshit...etc.
|
|
|
Post by ToNoAvail on Feb 18, 2017 13:39:02 GMT -5
^shut up, toiap.
|
|
|
Post by TitoOrtizIsAPunk on Feb 18, 2017 14:53:33 GMT -5
I haven't seen the right gush over a homo like this since Regan.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Feb 18, 2017 17:48:11 GMT -5
I haven't seen the right gush over a homo like this since Regan. Hah that's good bait for Facebook
|
|
|
Post by Fasthands25 on Feb 18, 2017 19:43:02 GMT -5
I like Milo, he is able to contain himself in a hostile environment.
As much as I like Gavin Mcinnes, he would be the kind of guy the left would love to get on a show like that. He would crack, say some outlandish over the top things, and the left would purposely take it out of context.
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Feb 18, 2017 22:41:11 GMT -5
10 min is the safe limit for interaction with a serious guest who is 35 IQ pts higher than you, better at debate, and on some really pure cocaine. Anything more and it's going to start getting obvious that you're on your bicycle and there are no counter arguments to Voltaire, to Hitchens, to Milo, to iconoclast in general, save the repackaged drum beat of totalitarianism and censorship and boycott. He is misunderstood, but only because he is very keenly understood, and thus urgently set upon being misunderstoodized, lest more people have a listen and un-fuck themselves.
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Feb 20, 2017 11:24:24 GMT -5
reason.com/blog/2017/02/20/alt-right-leader-richard-spencer-crashedThe difference between liberals and antifa and occupy and BLM . . . and libertarians? The difference between whatever moderate muslims are supposed to be and ISIS . . . and libertarians? We actually put principal over agenda, take ethics seriously, and cull our own heard.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 11:35:54 GMT -5
I read that article this morning as well. The funny thing was when I saw the term "Alt-Right Leader" I thought they were going to be trying to talk about Milo (who is clearly not an Alt-Right leader).
I just discovered Paul Joseph Watson this morning.
If I could take a long bus ride with two guys with British accents (which I sometimes find annoying) it would be Milo and Paul.
|
|
|
Post by hammerfaust on Feb 20, 2017 12:15:20 GMT -5
I watched Milo's segment on Real Time, and I just wasn't that impressed with him. Admittedly this is the only time I have heard him speak, but for all the Milo nut-hugging going on in this thread I just expected more from him. To me he seemed like your typical flighty gay dude that says outrageous stuff just to get a reaction. Again, I realize my Milo sample size is all of 10 minutes on Bill Maher, but he certainly didn't strike me as some super-genius.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 12:28:34 GMT -5
So basically, what you're saying, is that your experience with him was limited to him being on a leftist show where he was not given much time and yet you still think your two cents is worth two cents? That's great. But you should probably watch more than him on Maher before you speak like you've actually got two pennies worth of information to form an opinion from.
Here's a start.
|
|
|
Post by hammerfaust on Feb 20, 2017 12:32:10 GMT -5
So basically, what you're saying, is that your experience with him was limited to him being on a leftist show where he was not given much time Yes, that is exactly what I am saying... I thought I was pretty clear on that.
|
|