Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Jul 8, 2018 17:20:40 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2018 17:20:40 GMT -5
Spoiler alerts are simple. Check it out:
Spoiler alert:
Trump wins 2020 and you'll still be a dick when he does.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Jul 8, 2018 20:29:20 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2018 20:29:20 GMT -5
If you're in here talking about a series that you haven't even finished 3/4 of ah season, you're an idiot and deserve to have it spoiled. First off, I came in here saying a series was worth checking out. That is kind of the point of the thread, dunce.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Jul 8, 2018 20:30:29 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2018 20:30:29 GMT -5
Spoiler alerts are simple. Check it out: Spoiler alert: Trump wins 2020 and you'll still be a dick when he does. That would take some common sense and not still being emo over me just pointing out his plants look on the smaller side.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Jul 8, 2018 20:34:13 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2018 20:34:13 GMT -5
I apologize for upsetting the sanctity of the thread. I deleted my post, but the spoiler lives on through quotes. You can still thoroughly enjoy the show, even knowing. Don't let it deter you. Good to know. I like that show as well. Good you know you like it as well.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Jul 8, 2018 23:33:30 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by andrewk1988 on Jul 8, 2018 23:33:30 GMT -5
Spoiler alerts are simple. Check it out: Spoiler alert: Trump wins 2020 and you'll still be a dick when he does. That would take some common sense and not still being emo over me just pointing out his plants look on the smaller side.
I definitely apologize if I spoiled it for you. I made the mistake of unreasonably assuming from your post that you had seen at least one season, it definitely wasn't personal. Either way, it wasn't a good idea to say anyway considering someone else who hadn't seen it might and would be interested. You're not even funny or good at talking shit. Just stick to the co-signs, you know?
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on Jul 8, 2018 23:38:07 GMT -5
You apologized - cool. Thank you. I do plan on getting to Bloodline pretty soon and also trying Sneaky Pete. I watched the first episode of Sneaky awhile back and need to finish a season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Jul 9, 2018 11:10:20 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2018 11:10:20 GMT -5
You apologized - cool. Thank you. I do plan on getting to Bloodline pretty soon and also trying Sneaky Pete. I watched the first episode of Sneaky awhile back and need to finish a season. Sneaky Pete > Bloodline imo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2018 13:36:01 GMT -5
Ozark season 2 dropped today.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Aug 31, 2018 13:57:05 GMT -5
Post by ocmmafan on Aug 31, 2018 13:57:05 GMT -5
The new Jack Ryan series also dropped today on Amazon.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Aug 31, 2018 14:09:41 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by adamg01 on Aug 31, 2018 14:09:41 GMT -5
The new Jack Ryan series also dropped today on Amazon. I hope this doesn’t disappoint.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Sept 1, 2018 11:35:28 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2018 11:35:28 GMT -5
3 episodes into Ozark. So far just as good as the first season.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Sept 1, 2018 17:32:02 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by adamg01 on Sept 1, 2018 17:32:02 GMT -5
Jack Ryan is definitely worth watching. I’d probably give it 7.8/10.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Sept 1, 2018 17:51:28 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2018 17:51:28 GMT -5
Jack Ryan is definitely worth watching. I’d probably give it 7.8/10. It was hard for me to take Jim seriously. Too bad Dwight isn't in this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Sept 1, 2018 18:56:14 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2018 18:56:14 GMT -5
That's the only thing with Jack Ryan.
It's hard to see Jim as a bad ass. But he's probably a good enough actor to pull it off.
That's up after Ozark is done.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Sept 1, 2018 20:13:08 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by adamg01 on Sept 1, 2018 20:13:08 GMT -5
That's the only thing with Jack Ryan. It's hard to see Jim as a bad ass. But he's probably a good enough actor to pull it off. That's up after Ozark is done. I never watched the office but I will say the movie 13 hours is a good movie that certified him as an on-screen badass IMO. One of the few Michael Bay movies that isn’t a bunch of flashy nonsense.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Sept 5, 2018 8:36:37 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by sooner2 on Sept 5, 2018 8:36:37 GMT -5
Ozark s2 is good. I like the development of the peripheral characters , and like the enhanced role mrs Boyd is playing in political game.
Unclear what kind of role pappa longmore will eventually play. You can kinda see where they are heading with the snells and the preacher.
FBI agent is even more unlikeable this season than last. 🙂
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Sept 5, 2018 9:27:04 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2018 9:27:04 GMT -5
How many hours a week do most people spend watching tv here on average? I probably have the tv on 15 hours a week, but about half of that is typically something like history channel that is background noise while I am doing paperwork.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Nov 29, 2018 14:44:22 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Fasthands25 on Nov 29, 2018 14:44:22 GMT -5
One Punch Man is pretty lit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Nov 30, 2018 10:18:10 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2018 10:18:10 GMT -5
Bloodline Oh yeah. Check it out. They'll have you until the last season where they phone it in and shit the bed. Finally made it to the final season. You were not joking about shitting the bed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
TV TALK
Nov 30, 2018 12:35:42 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2018 12:35:42 GMT -5
It was pretty disappointing because the first two seasons were so good. But Florida cut tax benefits to film Crews and Netflix canceled as a result which lead them to rush the last season and pretty much kill the story.
I know they were thinking about trying to finish in California but the problem was that Florida was integral to the actual story and the setting was not going to be easily replicated. So, two solid seasons and a total crap final season which pretty much makes it so I wouldn't recommend the series to anyone.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Nov 30, 2018 12:43:53 GMT -5
Post by verbal0knit on Nov 30, 2018 12:43:53 GMT -5
One Punch Man is pretty lit. A reality show about Brad Pickett?
|
|
|
TV TALK
Nov 30, 2018 12:51:18 GMT -5
Post by ocmmafan on Nov 30, 2018 12:51:18 GMT -5
Narcos Mexico. Netflix.
8.5/10
Good show and an entertaining way to give insight into the rise of the cartels. This season is prior to Narcos season 1 and deals with DEA agent Kike Camarena and the rise of the DEA.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Nov 30, 2018 16:14:06 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by adamg01 on Nov 30, 2018 16:14:06 GMT -5
Narcos Mexico. Netflix. 8.5/10 Good show and an entertaining way to give insight into the rise of the cartels. This season is prior to Narcos season 1 and deals with DEA agent Kike Camarena and the rise of the DEA. I’ll give it a watch at some point, I kind of wish I would have never watched the documentary a while back on the operation.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Dec 3, 2018 23:22:10 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by HumanAgent on Dec 3, 2018 23:22:10 GMT -5
Narcos Mexico. Netflix. 8.5/10 Good show and an entertaining way to give insight into the rise of the cartels. This season is prior to Narcos season 1 and deals with DEA agent Kike Camarena and the rise of the DEA. How deep do they get into Kike's death? Do they blame Caro Quintero 100%? Or do they mention that Felix Ismael Rodriguez and the CIA may be responsible?
|
|
|
TV TALK
Dec 26, 2018 14:56:35 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by slaytan on Dec 26, 2018 14:56:35 GMT -5
Narcos Mexico. Netflix. 8.5/10 Good show and an entertaining way to give insight into the rise of the cartels. This season is prior to Narcos season 1 and deals with DEA agent Kike Camarena and the rise of the DEA. How deep do they get into Kike's death? Do they blame Caro Quintero 100%? Or do they mention that Felix Ismael Rodriguez and the CIA may be responsible? spoiler alert?
|
|
|
TV TALK
Dec 26, 2018 15:04:01 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by andrewk1988 on Dec 26, 2018 15:04:01 GMT -5
How deep do they get into Kike's death? Do they blame Caro Quintero 100%? Or do they mention that Felix Ismael Rodriguez and the CIA may be responsible? spoiler alert? I thought you didn't watch mind controlling liberal propaganda that is TV shows anyway.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Dec 26, 2018 15:11:55 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by HumanAgent on Dec 26, 2018 15:11:55 GMT -5
How deep do they get into Kike's death? Do they blame Caro Quintero 100%? Or do they mention that Felix Ismael Rodriguez and the CIA may be responsible? spoiler alert? My bad, maybe... I compare it to watching the Titanic. Are you relying on Netflix to tell you the truth? I'm going to go ahead and "guess" they blame solely Caro Quintero and don't mention the CIAs involvement in the drug trade... From 2013 elpais.com/elpais/2013/10/15/inenglish/1381856701_704435.amp.html
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Dec 26, 2018 15:23:31 GMT -5
So on Amazon Prime there’s a documentary called “Silence Patton “ Pretty good, I guess. A subject near and dear to me but they got most of it right. Impressively, included commentary fromVictor Davis Hanson, Paul Kengor, and Charles Province. In the end, they all seem to not believe that he was assasinated, which I find absurd. I can understand their reasons:
They say that there’s no way the conspirators could have staged the accident, because Patton made the decision to go hunting at the spur of the moment that morning. Also, for the plot to have worked, a lot of improbabilities would have had to line up perfectly, like in a dumb James Bond movie. That’s all true, but here’s the thing: they’re presuming that there was only one plot and one hit squad assigned to the task, which is a staggering failure to understand the situation.
Patton was THE enemy for Stalin, Eisenhower, and the entire deep state. The Germans were defeated, and in 1945, Patton represented as great or greater threat to Stalin, Ike, and the rest, than Germany ever did at the height of it’s power. With this in mind, we must understand that they would have devoted the same energy towards killing him as they did towards defeating Germany. There would have been dozens, of not hundreds of kill teams operating 24-7.
The kill team had an extremely difficult set of parameters. He needed to die, and it needed to appear as an accident -but with enough kill teams waiting for a window, that window would have presented itself, and I argue that it did. In the months before his death, Patton’s security detail was reduced to almost nothing (which made no sense to do, except to try and facilitate an assasination), and also Patton had been nearly killed in several bizarre “near miss” accidents. I argue that each of these near misses was a bonafide assasination attempt.
With regards to the “spur of the moment” hunting trip: yes, it was unplanned, but Patton had gone hunting to this very spot taking this same route enough times that it would definitely have been planned for as a possible place to stage an accident. It was several hours between the decision by Patton to go hunting, and the accident. More than enough time to spring a trap.
Not sure how to rate this documentary. I’m not sure it will hold your attention.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Dec 26, 2018 15:30:49 GMT -5
Post by verbal0knit on Dec 26, 2018 15:30:49 GMT -5
So on Amazon Prime there’s a documentary called “Silence Patton “ Pretty good, I guess. A subject near and dear to me but they got most of it right. Impressively, included commentary fromVictor Davis Hanson, Paul Kengor, and Charles Province. In the end, they all seem to not believe that he was assasinated, which I find absurd. I can understand their reasons: They say that there’s no way the conspirators could have staged the accident, because Patton made the decision to go hunting at the spur of the moment that morning. Also, for the plot to have worked, a lot of improbabilities would have had to line up perfectly, like in a dumb James Bond movie. That’s all true, but here’s the thing: they’re presuming that there was only one plot and one hit squad assigned to the task, which is a staggering failure to understand the situation. Patton was THE enemy for Stalin, Eisenhower, and the entire deep state. The Germans were defeated, and in 1945, Patton represented as great or greater threat to Stalin, Ike, and the rest, than Germany ever did at the height of it’s power. With this in mind, we must understand that they would have devoted the same energy towards killing him as they did towards defeating Germany. There would have been dozens, of not hundreds of kill teams operating 24-7. They had a difficult set of parameters, but with enough kill teams waiting for a window, that window would have presented itself, and I argue that it did. In the months before his death, Patton’s security detail was reduced to almost nothing (which made no sense to do, except to try and facilitate an assasination) Whether he was assassinated or not(I believe he was) his assertion that we "fought for the wrong side" was absolutely correct. Just look at the mess that Europe and the US are in now due to the bolshevik communist Jews in Russia winning ww2. The holocaust perpetrated by the Soviet union on the German people as well as the Pols was 6 million times worse than whatever phony holocaust the germans supposedly committed on the Jews. Just goes to show that the old saying is true...history is written by the winners of the wars.
|
|
|
TV TALK
Dec 26, 2018 15:37:30 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by slaytan on Dec 26, 2018 15:37:30 GMT -5
So on Amazon Prime there’s a documentary called “Silence Patton “ Pretty good, I guess. A subject near and dear to me but they got most of it right. Impressively, included commentary fromVictor Davis Hanson, Paul Kengor, and Charles Province. In the end, they all seem to not believe that he was assasinated, which I find absurd. I can understand their reasons: They say that there’s no way the conspirators could have staged the accident, because Patton made the decision to go hunting at the spur of the moment that morning. Also, for the plot to have worked, a lot of improbabilities would have had to line up perfectly, like in a dumb James Bond movie. That’s all true, but here’s the thing: they’re presuming that there was only one plot and one hit squad assigned to the task, which is a staggering failure to understand the situation. Patton was THE enemy for Stalin, Eisenhower, and the entire deep state. The Germans were defeated, and in 1945, Patton represented as great or greater threat to Stalin, Ike, and the rest, than Germany ever did at the height of it’s power. With this in mind, we must understand that they would have devoted the same energy towards killing him as they did towards defeating Germany. There would have been dozens, of not hundreds of kill teams operating 24-7. They had a difficult set of parameters, but with enough kill teams waiting for a window, that window would have presented itself, and I argue that it did. In the months before his death, Patton’s security detail was reduced to almost nothing (which made no sense to do, except to try and facilitate an assasination) Whether he was assassinated or not(I believe he was) his assertion that we "fought for the wrong side" was absolutely correct. Just look at the mess that Europe and the US are in now due to the bolshevik communist Jews in Russia winning ww2. The holocaust perpetrated by the Soviet union on the German people as well as the Pols was 6 million times worse than whatever phony holocaust the germans supposedly committed on the Jews. Just goes to show that the old saying is true...history is written by the winners of the wars. dammm I was hoping nobody saw my post before I edited. I accidentally posted it before I was done. Also I agree with you
|
|