|
|
Post by HankPNW on Sept 3, 2017 15:25:46 GMT -5
Colored people = offensive People of color = totally fine. Explanation required. Because they say the exact same thing. We're a nation of react first, think later. Look at the first word... that's usually how long people think before they react. |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 3, 2017 15:54:30 GMT -5
In 48hrs Mattis went from diplomacy is still possible to keep this up and we'll wipe you off the map. This guy is great.
|
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Sept 4, 2017 6:09:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 4, 2017 16:42:57 GMT -5
If you believe that shit, you have not paid attention to the world over the last decade +. Neither Russia nor China has the resources to wage a war, even against a weakened US. Neither Russia nor China give that much of a shit about NK outside of strategic military advantage that it gives the US. But they also both know that nobody in the world is gonna be imperialistic again, it won't work in today's world. Just look at the economy of China and Russia. The per capita GDP China has them just over $8,100, and is considered inflated due to the GDP power of the REEs and Shanghai that less than so few are accountable for. Do you realize how bad that is? They aren't even in the Top 1/3rd of ALL COUNTRIES. Know where third world countries, and hell holes start popping up in that list, the top 3rd. This means that any serious military action would wind up collapsing their economy even more. And adjusted rate has them potentially at a quarter of that! China plays the long game, so they'd never do that kind of military action because it would knock them out of the game, it would guarantee a revolt finally turning the country into a bunch of states basically being large versions of Shanghai/Hong Kong. Russia is better, but barely at 8,700, but has no resources. Their numbers are inflated on oil alone. They don't have the physical resources to wage an extended engagement or a war in the first place, and would have to literally starve their country to the point they would have no soldiers in order to produce said resources to prepare them for one even 5 years out from now. Russia won't launch that kind of military action because everything they have been doing has been pushing them towards an isolationist position, and all they really have to fight with is an understaffed, under equipped infantry, broken S-400s, Nuclear weapons minus the fuel to launch them, but they do have a decent but limited airforce. They won't do it. *source for numbers: data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?year_high_desc=true*what per capita GDP means, and how it affects countries. Just read any micro/macro textbook. Bradley Schiller's are a good one for today's world, I can send you a copy if you need. |
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Sept 5, 2017 7:16:42 GMT -5
If you believe that shit, you have not paid attention to the world over the last decade +. Neither Russia nor China has the resources to wage a war, even against a weakened US. Neither Russia nor China give that much of a shit about NK outside of strategic military advantage that it gives the US. But they also both know that nobody in the world is gonna be imperialistic again, it won't work in today's world. Just look at the economy of China and Russia. The per capita GDP China has them just over $8,100, and is considered inflated due to the GDP power of the REEs and Shanghai that less than so few are accountable for. Do you realize how bad that is? They aren't even in the Top 1/3rd of ALL COUNTRIES. Know where third world countries, and hell holes start popping up in that list, the top 3rd. This means that any serious military action would wind up collapsing their economy even more. And adjusted rate has them potentially at a quarter of that! China plays the long game, so they'd never do that kind of military action because it would knock them out of the game, it would guarantee a revolt finally turning the country into a bunch of states basically being large versions of Shanghai/Hong Kong. Russia is better, but barely at 8,700, but has no resources. Their numbers are inflated on oil alone. They don't have the physical resources to wage an extended engagement or a war in the first place, and would have to literally starve their country to the point they would have no soldiers in order to produce said resources to prepare them for one even 5 years out from now. Russia won't launch that kind of military action because everything they have been doing has been pushing them towards an isolationist position, and all they really have to fight with is an understaffed, under equipped infantry, broken S-400s, Nuclear weapons minus the fuel to launch them, but they do have a decent but limited airforce. They won't do it. *source for numbers: data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?year_high_desc=true*what per capita GDP means, and how it affects countries. Just read any micro/macro textbook. Bradley Schiller's are a good one for today's world, I can send you a copy if you need. Shut up dickface |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 5, 2017 7:39:58 GMT -5
If you believe that shit, you have not paid attention to the world over the last decade +. Neither Russia nor China has the resources to wage a war, even against a weakened US. Neither Russia nor China give that much of a shit about NK outside of strategic military advantage that it gives the US. But they also both know that nobody in the world is gonna be imperialistic again, it won't work in today's world. Just look at the economy of China and Russia. The per capita GDP China has them just over $8,100, and is considered inflated due to the GDP power of the REEs and Shanghai that less than so few are accountable for. Do you realize how bad that is? They aren't even in the Top 1/3rd of ALL COUNTRIES. Know where third world countries, and hell holes start popping up in that list, the top 3rd. This means that any serious military action would wind up collapsing their economy even more. And adjusted rate has them potentially at a quarter of that! China plays the long game, so they'd never do that kind of military action because it would knock them out of the game, it would guarantee a revolt finally turning the country into a bunch of states basically being large versions of Shanghai/Hong Kong. Russia is better, but barely at 8,700, but has no resources. Their numbers are inflated on oil alone. They don't have the physical resources to wage an extended engagement or a war in the first place, and would have to literally starve their country to the point they would have no soldiers in order to produce said resources to prepare them for one even 5 years out from now. Russia won't launch that kind of military action because everything they have been doing has been pushing them towards an isolationist position, and all they really have to fight with is an understaffed, under equipped infantry, broken S-400s, Nuclear weapons minus the fuel to launch them, but they do have a decent but limited airforce. They won't do it. *source for numbers: data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?year_high_desc=true*what per capita GDP means, and how it affects countries. Just read any micro/macro textbook. Bradley Schiller's are a good one for today's world, I can send you a copy if you need. Shut up dickface I figured you'd be relieved the sky isn't falling. But I am not sorry I had to ruin your dreams of a Sino-Soviet invasion and new world order. The economics behind it just doesn't hold up, they just don't have enough people to do that without literally starving to death, and stopping almost all production across the board. |
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Sept 5, 2017 9:00:07 GMT -5
I figured you'd be relieved the sky isn't falling. But I am not sorry I had to ruin your dreams of a Sino-Soviet invasion and new world order. The economics behind it just doesn't hold up, they just don't have enough people to do that without literally starving to death, and stopping almost all production across the board. I would be extremely relieved if it weren't the biggest schmendrik on the board telling me to be relieved |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 5, 2017 9:55:41 GMT -5
I figured you'd be relieved the sky isn't falling. But I am not sorry I had to ruin your dreams of a Sino-Soviet invasion and new world order. The economics behind it just doesn't hold up, they just don't have enough people to do that without literally starving to death, and stopping almost all production across the board. I would be extremely relieved if it weren't the biggest schmendrik on the board telling me to be relieved I gave you a link to the #s. I gave you the economic terms to look up. You are smart enough to put two and two together. Lemme try to sum up a few parts. Low per capita GDP means lack of labor, lack of infrastructure, lack of resources, lack of government, or lack of modern technology. Anything below 25k has one of these issues. Anything below 15k has more than one of these. Anything below 10k has most if not all of these. China is 8,100 (adjusted, closer to 4,000), Russia has 8,700 (adjusted, also closer to 4k). Now when you are that low, it basically means you are either in ruins, or have extremely sharp divides among your country and as a result are actually spread really thin trying to stay afloat. This also means that when you shift production (which in this case would be the classic guns vs butter dilemma), your country takes a more noticeable impact from the what it is sacrificing for that shift. Now, you see why Russia and China wouldn't actually begin a serious military engagement? Especially against a country that has the capabilities are producing our weapons, ammunition, medicine, training, all without actually killing off our population and what infrastructure we have? Russia especially given that they have one of the largest military expenditure percentages in the world during peacetime, which makes it even harder to adjust for a military engagement without basically killing off their own country. If China and/or Russia attempted it, they'd lose. They'd lose both the military battles, and their existence as a country under their current governments. They'd get beaten on the battlefield, and overthrown by homegrown revolts at the same time. Now Russia keeps going downhill more and more. They are pretty much fucked for the next 1-2 decades unless they break up into smaller countries with an open market again, and an actual republic/democracy. China on the other hand, they are getting closer and closer to solving their economic issues. It will take awhile because of how bad it is, but the leaders are getting their affairs in order to finally drop communism, and when they do and the borders open up to the opportunities, they'll develop fast. They'll have no need to expand via military at that point either given the natural resources they have. They can go from that puny 8k up to 50k inside of 12-15 years. |
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Sept 5, 2017 11:54:39 GMT -5
I refer you to the earlier "shut up dickface." Is there a single subject that you are not a dilettante professor of?
Of course, in all likelihood there is no war imminent with Russia and China. But your reasoning is simply stupid and absolute fluff
|
|
|
|
Post by HumanAgent on Sept 5, 2017 12:56:08 GMT -5
I would be extremely relieved if it weren't the biggest schmendrik on the board telling me to be relieved I gave you a link to the #s. I gave you the economic terms to look up. You are smart enough to put two and two together. Lemme try to sum up a few parts. Low per capita GDP means lack of labor, lack of infrastructure, lack of resources, lack of government, or lack of modern technology. Anything below 25k has one of these issues. Anything below 15k has more than one of these. Anything below 10k has most if not all of these. China is 8,100 (adjusted, closer to 4,000), Russia has 8,700 (adjusted, also closer to 4k). Now when you are that low, it basically means you are either in ruins, or have extremely sharp divides among your country and as a result are actually spread really thin trying to stay afloat. This also means that when you shift production (which in this case would be the classic guns vs butter dilemma), your country takes a more noticeable impact from the what it is sacrificing for that shift. Now, you see why Russia and China wouldn't actually begin a serious military engagement? Especially against a country that has the capabilities are producing our weapons, ammunition, medicine, training, all without actually killing off our population and what infrastructure we have? Russia especially given that they have one of the largest military expenditure percentages in the world during peacetime, which makes it even harder to adjust for a military engagement without basically killing off their own country. If China and/or Russia attempted it, they'd lose. They'd lose both the military battles, and their existence as a country under their current governments. They'd get beaten on the battlefield, and overthrown by homegrown revolts at the same time. Now Russia keeps going downhill more and more. They are pretty much fucked for the next 1-2 decades unless they break up into smaller countries with an open market again, and an actual republic/democracy. China on the other hand, they are getting closer and closer to solving their economic issues. It will take awhile because of how bad it is, but the leaders are getting their affairs in order to finally drop communism, and when they do and the borders open up to the opportunities, they'll develop fast. They'll have no need to expand via military at that point either given the natural resources they have. They can go from that puny 8k up to 50k inside of 12-15 years. How do you know so much on this subject if you don't mind me asking |
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Sept 5, 2017 13:45:04 GMT -5
Florida is on full freak out mode for Hurricane Irma. Its not projected to hit FL until late Friday or early Saturday.....but here we are on Tuesday and every walmart around me ran out of water. Gas will be next.
Last year we had a scare for Hurracaine Matthew. I've never seen anything like it....all the Walmarts and local supermarkets looked like a scene from the Walking Dead.
This is my 4th year living in south Florida and luckily I haven't been thought a mayor storm yet. But I keep hearing we are due for one. Its been several years since the last big one....for South Florida at least.
|
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Sept 5, 2017 13:52:47 GMT -5
I gave you a link to the #s. I gave you the economic terms to look up. You are smart enough to put two and two together. Lemme try to sum up a few parts. Low per capita GDP means lack of labor, lack of infrastructure, lack of resources, lack of government, or lack of modern technology. Anything below 25k has one of these issues. Anything below 15k has more than one of these. Anything below 10k has most if not all of these. China is 8,100 (adjusted, closer to 4,000), Russia has 8,700 (adjusted, also closer to 4k). Now when you are that low, it basically means you are either in ruins, or have extremely sharp divides among your country and as a result are actually spread really thin trying to stay afloat. This also means that when you shift production (which in this case would be the classic guns vs butter dilemma), your country takes a more noticeable impact from the what it is sacrificing for that shift. Now, you see why Russia and China wouldn't actually begin a serious military engagement? Especially against a country that has the capabilities are producing our weapons, ammunition, medicine, training, all without actually killing off our population and what infrastructure we have? Russia especially given that they have one of the largest military expenditure percentages in the world during peacetime, which makes it even harder to adjust for a military engagement without basically killing off their own country. If China and/or Russia attempted it, they'd lose. They'd lose both the military battles, and their existence as a country under their current governments. They'd get beaten on the battlefield, and overthrown by homegrown revolts at the same time. Now Russia keeps going downhill more and more. They are pretty much fucked for the next 1-2 decades unless they break up into smaller countries with an open market again, and an actual republic/democracy. China on the other hand, they are getting closer and closer to solving their economic issues. It will take awhile because of how bad it is, but the leaders are getting their affairs in order to finally drop communism, and when they do and the borders open up to the opportunities, they'll develop fast. They'll have no need to expand via military at that point either given the natural resources they have. They can go from that puny 8k up to 50k inside of 12-15 years. How do you know so much on this subject if you don't mind me asking |
|
|
|
Post by HumanAgent on Sept 5, 2017 13:59:52 GMT -5
How do you know so much on this subject if you don't mind me asking Jimmy Wales or Larry Sanger post here? GTFO! Yes I looked it up hahaha |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2017 16:11:39 GMT -5
Adios DACA. Boy, is this going to start a shit storm in my area.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 5, 2017 17:26:51 GMT -5
I gave you a link to the #s. I gave you the economic terms to look up. You are smart enough to put two and two together. Lemme try to sum up a few parts. Low per capita GDP means lack of labor, lack of infrastructure, lack of resources, lack of government, or lack of modern technology. Anything below 25k has one of these issues. Anything below 15k has more than one of these. Anything below 10k has most if not all of these. China is 8,100 (adjusted, closer to 4,000), Russia has 8,700 (adjusted, also closer to 4k). Now when you are that low, it basically means you are either in ruins, or have extremely sharp divides among your country and as a result are actually spread really thin trying to stay afloat. This also means that when you shift production (which in this case would be the classic guns vs butter dilemma), your country takes a more noticeable impact from the what it is sacrificing for that shift. Now, you see why Russia and China wouldn't actually begin a serious military engagement? Especially against a country that has the capabilities are producing our weapons, ammunition, medicine, training, all without actually killing off our population and what infrastructure we have? Russia especially given that they have one of the largest military expenditure percentages in the world during peacetime, which makes it even harder to adjust for a military engagement without basically killing off their own country. If China and/or Russia attempted it, they'd lose. They'd lose both the military battles, and their existence as a country under their current governments. They'd get beaten on the battlefield, and overthrown by homegrown revolts at the same time. Now Russia keeps going downhill more and more. They are pretty much fucked for the next 1-2 decades unless they break up into smaller countries with an open market again, and an actual republic/democracy. China on the other hand, they are getting closer and closer to solving their economic issues. It will take awhile because of how bad it is, but the leaders are getting their affairs in order to finally drop communism, and when they do and the borders open up to the opportunities, they'll develop fast. They'll have no need to expand via military at that point either given the natural resources they have. They can go from that puny 8k up to 50k inside of 12-15 years. How do you know so much on this subject if you don't mind me asking This isn't knowing "so much", this is basic economics. I had to take economic classes in college and this stuff is actually pretty basic, which is why Garth probably doesn't know it given his hatred of colleges. They cover this stuff in both intro Econ courses for fucks sake. I read textbooks and journals in my spare time still to this day, The Dresden Files is about the only non-fiction I still read, this includes various Econ textbooks. And my father has been teaching Economics for 40 years now as of last month I think, and his normal topics of conversation are pretty much either Economics related or old TV/Movie related. But in my original post pointing out the flaws in Garth's view, I gave him the information he could look up, so he could read and conclude for himself. He won't though has the great Sino-Soviet takeover has been his life's dream and he doesn't want to lose it even though year after year the evidence builds up against it ever happening. |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 5, 2017 17:27:54 GMT -5
Adios DACA. Boy, is this going to start a shit storm in my area. All he did was pass it onto Congress, they are likely going to make it the law of the land. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2017 17:32:15 GMT -5
Florida is on full freak out mode for Hurricane Irma. Its not projected to hit FL until late Friday or early Saturday.....but here we are on Tuesday and every walmart around me ran out of water. Gas will be next. Last year we had a scare for Hurracaine Matthew. I've never seen anything like it....all the Walmarts and local supermarkets looked like a scene from the Walking Dead. This is my 4th year living in south Florida and luckily I haven't been thought a mayor storm yet. But I keep hearing we are due for one. Its been several years since the last big one....for South Florida at least. Are you in a place with expected damage or evacuations where you are living? |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 5, 2017 18:24:56 GMT -5
Florida is on full freak out mode for Hurricane Irma. Its not projected to hit FL until late Friday or early Saturday.....but here we are on Tuesday and every walmart around me ran out of water. Gas will be next. Last year we had a scare for Hurracaine Matthew. I've never seen anything like it....all the Walmarts and local supermarkets looked like a scene from the Walking Dead. This is my 4th year living in south Florida and luckily I haven't been thought a mayor storm yet. But I keep hearing we are due for one. Its been several years since the last big one....for South Florida at least. Are you in a place with expected damage or evacuations where you are living? I think a lot of the panic is because of Harvey and the damage it caused. There is an interesting article I read the other day though about why Florida can actually handle a hurricane better than Texas did, and the flooding wouldn't be as bad. It would be as bad, but Florida has better soil and anti-flood measures to prevent the accumulation as much, and also drain it out faster. www.orlandosentinel.com/weather/hurricane/os-orlando-flood-worst-scenario-20170831-story.html |
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Sept 5, 2017 19:07:52 GMT -5
Florida is on full freak out mode for Hurricane Irma. Its not projected to hit FL until late Friday or early Saturday.....but here we are on Tuesday and every walmart around me ran out of water. Gas will be next. Last year we had a scare for Hurracaine Matthew. I've never seen anything like it....all the Walmarts and local supermarkets looked like a scene from the Walking Dead. This is my 4th year living in south Florida and luckily I haven't been thought a mayor storm yet. But I keep hearing we are due for one. Its been several years since the last big one....for South Florida at least. Are you in a place with expected damage or evacuations where you are living? I am about a mile away from the ocean in Boca Raton. But I live in a marina that connects to the Florida instracoastal river and to the ocean. Surrounded by water. I didn't hear anything about mandatory evacuations during our last scare (Hurracaine Matthew last year). Not sure if evacuation orders are coming for Irma. My saving grace is that I live in a second floor condo. |
|
|
|
Post by PatSox on Sept 5, 2017 19:17:22 GMT -5
Florida is on full freak out mode for Hurricane Irma. Its not projected to hit FL until late Friday or early Saturday.....but here we are on Tuesday and every walmart around me ran out of water. Gas will be next. Last year we had a scare for Hurracaine Matthew. I've never seen anything like it....all the Walmarts and local supermarkets looked like a scene from the Walking Dead. This is my 4th year living in south Florida and luckily I haven't been thought a mayor storm yet. But I keep hearing we are due for one. Its been several years since the last big one....for South Florida at least. My brother's in Tampa. He sent me pictures from a supermarket called Win Dixie and another called Publix (Florida sure likes the letter x), with rows of empty shelves. And his girlfriend sent some from a Costco, where she could hardly even get out of the parking lot Man, and I thought people were bad up here, before a blizzard. I mean, look, if that storm is a cat 4 or 5 and it hits your town, all the fresh water and peanut butter sandwiches in the world aren't going to matter, because it will be washed away in a debris laden river. And if it ISN'T a cat 4 or 5, you won't have needed all that stuff anyway .........So what's the point? |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 5, 2017 19:27:17 GMT -5
My brother's in Tampa. He sent me pictures from a supermarket called Win Dixie and another called Publix (Florida sure likes the letter x), with rows of empty shelves. And his girlfriend sent some from a Costco, where she could hardly even get out of the parking lot Man, and I thought people were bad up here, before a blizzard. I mean, look, if that storm is a cat 4 or 5 and it hits your town, all the fresh water and peanut butter sandwiches in the world aren't going to matter, because it will be washed away in a debris laden river. And if it ISN'T a cat 4 or 5, you won't have needed all that stuff anyway .........So what's the point? We were always more prepared for blizzard recovery and shut-ins though since we deal with them multiple times a year for most of our lives up there. These kind of storms that hit Texas, gonna maybe hit Florida, they are years apart so they don't build up that routine of what do do and what is actually needed during the bad part of it. It just comes with experience. Also we don't need to worry about clean water shortage and spoiled foods during a blizzard. |
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Sept 6, 2017 8:07:07 GMT -5
Florida is on full freak out mode for Hurricane Irma. Its not projected to hit FL until late Friday or early Saturday.....but here we are on Tuesday and every walmart around me ran out of water. Gas will be next. Last year we had a scare for Hurracaine Matthew. I've never seen anything like it....all the Walmarts and local supermarkets looked like a scene from the Walking Dead. This is my 4th year living in south Florida and luckily I haven't been thought a mayor storm yet. But I keep hearing we are due for one. Its been several years since the last big one....for South Florida at least. My brother's in Tampa. He sent me pictures from a supermarket called Win Dixie and another called Publix (Florida sure likes the letter x), with rows of empty shelves. And his girlfriend sent some from a Costco, where she could hardly even get out of the parking lot Man, and I thought people were bad up here, before a blizzard. I mean, look, if that storm is a cat 4 or 5 and it hits your town, all the fresh water and peanut butter sandwiches in the world aren't going to matter, because it will be washed away in a debris laden river. And if it ISN'T a cat 4 or 5, you won't have needed all that stuff anyway .........So what's the point? You should see the lines at the gas station. Retailers LOVE these hurricane scares. TV news and websites love it too. Lots of eyes watching or reading. LOL, Publix and Winn Dixie.....yeah, those are the two biggest ones here. |
|
|
|
Post by MMAJim on Sept 6, 2017 8:23:28 GMT -5
They try to get people whipped into a frenzy here in MN for blizzards, but its basically always meh? Worst case scenario, in my lifetime in WI/MN has been maybe stay 'in' for a day to avoid the hassle. With 4x4s and AWD vehicles though 8-12 inches is kind of nice sometimes. There have been times when 4 lanes highways are basically wide open and not plowed at all. One lane of FWD cars on the far right should crawling along. The rest of it wide open 4x4 racing (as long as traffic is relatively light).
I'd be more worried about getting jammed up in a true rush hour blizzard than getting snowed in at home. That said, everyone is pretty good about cancelling things and staying home if there is a big one coming.
As mentioned above, none of that can come close to Cat 4/5 hurricanes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2017 8:40:22 GMT -5
We have Nor'Easters. Basically hurricanes with snow.
And everyone skips bottled water, and buy out the bread, milk, and corn chips for kindling.
Most of (Southern) Floridian construction is concrete based. 180mph wind will fuck up their windows and roofs, but the buildings themselves should be ok.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2017 9:15:53 GMT -5
Are you in a place with expected damage or evacuations where you are living? I think a lot of the panic is because of Harvey and the damage it caused. There is an interesting article I read the other day though about why Florida can actually handle a hurricane better than Texas did, and the flooding wouldn't be as bad. It would be as bad, but Florida has better soil and anti-flood measures to prevent the accumulation as much, and also drain it out faster. www.orlandosentinel.com/weather/hurricane/os-orlando-flood-worst-scenario-20170831-story.htmlI love the blatant nervy posting here. A guy is being asked if he is any danger. And this guy comes in with wiki knowledge. |
|
|
|
Post by CaveBearOG on Sept 6, 2017 9:19:16 GMT -5
How quickly we forgot about Houston smh....but I digress. In Erie county we have lake effect snow. It's nothing to wake up to a foot of snow. Fuck Buffalo got like 80 inches a couple years ago. Minnesota blizzard, noreaster, please.
|
|
|
|
Post by CaveBearOG on Sept 6, 2017 9:22:36 GMT -5
I think a lot of the panic is because of Harvey and the damage it caused. There is an interesting article I read the other day though about why Florida can actually handle a hurricane better than Texas did, and the flooding wouldn't be as bad. It would be as bad, but Florida has better soil and anti-flood measures to prevent the accumulation as much, and also drain it out faster. www.orlandosentinel.com/weather/hurricane/os-orlando-flood-worst-scenario-20170831-story.htmlI love the blatant nervy posting here. A guy is being asked if he is any danger. And this guy comes in with wiki knowledge. Agreed. This storm is a record breaking storm. Keep your pretty head down premiere. |
|
|
|
Post by johncfc on Sept 6, 2017 10:36:58 GMT -5
I think a lot of the panic is because of Harvey and the damage it caused. There is an interesting article I read the other day though about why Florida can actually handle a hurricane better than Texas did, and the flooding wouldn't be as bad. It would be as bad, but Florida has better soil and anti-flood measures to prevent the accumulation as much, and also drain it out faster. www.orlandosentinel.com/weather/hurricane/os-orlando-flood-worst-scenario-20170831-story.htmlI love the blatant nervy posting here. A guy is being asked if he is any danger. And this guy comes in with wiki knowledge. Jackel was struck by lightning, so he is free to comment on any weather related event with impunity. He lived through it brah. He lived through it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2017 11:02:41 GMT -5
I love the blatant nervy posting here. A guy is being asked if he is any danger. And this guy comes in with wiki knowledge. Jackel was struck by lightning, so he is free to comment on any weather related event with impunity. He lived through it brah. He lived through it. How could have I forgotten? How silly of me!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Sept 6, 2017 11:46:28 GMT -5
|
|
