|
Post by verbal0knit on May 2, 2019 10:10:31 GMT -5
4 more years of Trump is 4 more years we stray away from the rabbit hole of socialism. What the andrew types and other idiots want is a world with equality of outcome, and they see that fantasy in the garbage Bernie and Ocasio Cortez spill out of their mouth. A nonsensical model that sells well to morons that believe they are deserving a bigger piece of the pie while lacking contribution to the pie. The ONLY place where equality of outcome occurs is in PRISON. And the further we push ourselves towards the socialized model of "free" shit for lazy, unskilled andrews" the closer we get to all of us living in a prison. Trump is the lone wolf fighting the lunatics. We are going to be fucked when he's gone. Socialism was created as a trapdoor ideology by the likes of Karl Marx. It was never meant to be a working, stable economic philosophy. Thats why it always fails, and turns into dictatorship where the people starve. It was designed with the intention of usurping wealth, and establishing a centralized authority to do so. Socialism's false promises sound enticing to the useful idiots, like Andrew, because people like Andrew are mentally and physically inferior and they're incapable of creating, and being successful on their own. But even though they're not capable of creating and earning things on their own, they still want the same nice things that you've created and earned. Hence their desire for socialism and the false equality that socialism promises.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on May 2, 2019 11:42:04 GMT -5
The hilarity of a government employee and a government reliant bon bon reviewer telling me that I want socialism is hilarious.
When a guy like verbal projects his ideas of someone else's political/social/economic ideas, what you really see is their true colors. Everybody knows what a joke OC is, collecting government checks for a career. Verbal isn't far behind, probably claiming disability and riding scooters through walmart to get his half dozen donuts for the day, while blaming the jews for everything he lacks as a man.
|
|
|
Post by MMAJim on May 2, 2019 14:12:24 GMT -5
Did you watch the whole hearing or did you get a breakdown from somewhere. Who is going to get impeached? Full disclosure, I read one breakdown on the hearing today. It was while I was on the shitter and it was from the BBC app on my phone. The article had a radically different viewpoint than however you received the information. Basically ho-hum, some guys went after him, his answers were carefully worded and effectively nuetralized most of the rigorous questions from Democrats. I don't think anyone can make a case that BBC is bias for the right wing. So I am literally curious where you came up with the hot take. I was reading a transcript, I didn't watch the proceedings. It may not have been a full transcript. To me it sounded like he admitted to not even thoroughly going through the Mueller report before rushing to put out a defense summary. He spent time doing what a defense attorney would do, which is try to "get in the mind" of Trump and explain his actions for him. And he fairly obviously perjured himself by saying he did not discuss the Mueller report with anyone in the White House, and then later admitting to another questioner that he did. Nobody, and I mean nobody should defend William Barr or think he's doing anything on behalf of the American people. That was true before Trump hired him to be his defense attorney....ahem AG, and it's even more true now. I have a feeling it'll be even more true somehow tomorrow. He is the epitome of "the swamp". I'm not going to defend Barr completely because really, I don't know enough about him and how government has truly functioned since it's inception. However, if you just break it down to the simplest level. I come away with this. Did he send out the initial letter with a particular intent in mind? Yes. Was it incorrect or false? No. Possible argument on obstruction, however, Mueller did not conclude that there was obstruction or not, which allowed for Barr to make that determination. The language that people tried to extrapolate out of the obstruction comments in Barr's letter are pretty conversation pieces only and irrelevant to the actual question because the determination is to be made by him. Would Democrats and 99% of media gone hysterical if he waited 3+ weeks to deeply analyze and compose his report, redact sensitive information, and release the document? Abso-fucken-lutely. So the charade yesterday was going to happen no matter what. Release a brief summary (which he quickly stated wasn't even a summary) and outline when the release would come or wait long enough to do a full release? Either way, outrage and hearings (I mean congress people grandstanding for the camera) would have happened either way. Just my thoughts on this particular entertainment piece from the media.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2019 9:12:59 GMT -5
Whiny fuckbags like Andrew and Nancy Peolosi are going to complain no matter what, so this is just more noise that doesn't matter. They know Trump has 2020 in the bag, and this is simply their latest failed attempt at creating something out of nothing. Nancy Pelosi was quoted yesterday as saying "impeaching Trump would be the easy way out".... really, that is what you think people believe. If they had 1/100th of the reason to impeach Trump as the republicans did to impeach Clinton they would be lining up to file the paperwork.
|
|
|
Post by locogato11283 on May 3, 2019 12:12:59 GMT -5
Trump is still winning!
I love seeing the liberals whine and cry.
They just keep on digging that hole.
Shit is hilarious.
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on May 3, 2019 16:18:10 GMT -5
LOL! Low IQ, fat fuck andrew that works as a government contractor again crying about me working for the government? I laugh every time. Anyway, sharing a swift kick in the chops to andrew on this fine Friday. Pulled from none other than his favorite source of reading material, the NYT. Trump continues to dominate the economic recovery while fat punks like andrew cry and whine for more free shit. www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/business/economy/wage-growth-economy.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=HomepageFor years it was the central question in an otherwise impressive recovery by the American job market: Why aren’t wages rising faster? Unemployment was low. Hiring was strong. Corporate executives were complaining that they could not find people to fill all of the available jobs. Yet workers’ paychecks were growing only sluggishly, barely outpacing inflation. And then wage growth suddenly picked up. Average hourly earnings in April were 3.2 percent higher than a year earlier, the ninth straight month in which growth topped 3 percent, the Labor Department reported Friday. Other measures diverge on the exact timing and rate of increase, but not on the basic trend: Wage growth, long stuck in neutral, has at last found a higher gear. “We’ve spent several years going, ‘Where is the wage growth? Where is the wage growth?’” said Martha Gimbel, an economist for the job-search site Indeed. “And it turns out we just had to wait a few years for the labor market to get tighter.” Which workers are benefiting? The recent gains are going to those who need it most. Over the past year, low-wage workers have experienced the fastest pay increases, a shift from earlier in the recovery, when wage growth was concentrated at the top.The faster growth at the bottom is probably being fueled in part by recent minimum-wage increases in cities and states across the country. Research from the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal-leaning think tank, found that over the past five years, wages for low-wage workers rose 13 percent in states that raised their minimum wages, compared with 8.4 percent in states that did not. But minimum wages are only part of the story. Ernie Tedeschi, an economist at Evercore ISI, estimates that the minimum-wage increases account for a quarter to a third of low-wage workers’ gains over the past three years. The rest is most likely a result of a tightening labor market that is forcing employers to raise pay even for workers at the bottom of the earnings ladder. Ms. Gimbel noted that better-paying industries had experienced faster job growth in recent months, while the fastest wage growth had been in lower-paying industries. That could indicate that sectors like health care and manufacturing are snapping up workers, forcing retailers and restaurants to raise pay to compete. Still, not everyone is benefiting equally. African-American workers have seen smaller gains over the course of the recovery, for example. And wage growth remains slow in some parts of the country that were hit especially hard by the recession. [One challenge has been to provide better-paid jobs to workers without a bachelor’s degree. Here’s a look at where to find them.] What took so long? Many economists were puzzled by the slow pace of pay increases because it looked as if a fundamental relationship had broken down. Decades ago, economists observed that when unemployment falls, wages tend to rise, as companies are forced to offer higher pay to attract workers. Yet even as the unemployment rate fell from 10 percent in 2009 to less than 5 percent in 2016, wages rose slowly. Even now, with the unemployment rate near multidecade lows, wages are not rising as quickly as standard models suggest they should be. Economists proposed all sorts of theories to explain the mystery: Globalization and automation meant that Americans were competing against lower-paid workers overseas and against robots at home. The rising power of the biggest corporations, paired with falling rates of unionization, made it harder for workers to negotiate for higher pay. Sluggish productivity growth meant that companies couldn’t raise pay without eating into profits. The recent uptick in wage growth suggests a simpler explanation: Perhaps the job market wasn’t as good as the unemployment rate made it look. The government’s official definition of unemployment is relatively narrow. It counts only people actively looking for work, which means it leaves out many students, stay-at-home parents or others who might like jobs if they were available. If employers have been tapping into that broader pool of potential labor, it could help explain why they haven’t been forced to raise wages faster. It appears as if that is exactly what is happening. In recent months, more than 70 percent of people getting jobs had not been counted as unemployed the previous month. That is well above historical levels, and a sign that the strong labor market is drawing people off the sidelines. “You look at those people who do not want a job, people who were out of the labor market due to disability, all of those people are coming back in,” said Adam Ozimek, an economist who has studied the issue. Several years ago, Mr. Ozimek discovered that with a broader definition of unemployment — lacking a job, for any reason, while in one’s prime working years — wage growth had been in line with historical expectations throughout the recovery. That relationship has held up as the job market has improved. In other words, he argued, the wage-growth “mystery” wasn’t a mystery at all. How high can wage growth go? Three percent is hardly a breakneck pace for wage growth. In the tight labor market of the late 1990s and early 2000s, wage growth for nonsupervisory workers topped 4 percent for several years without causing runaway inflation. Mr. Ozimek sees no reason that history can’t repeat. Hiring remains strong, suggesting that companies are still able to find the workers they need, even if they have to work a bit harder to get them. Inflation is not just tame; it is actually slowing, meaning Federal Reserve policymakers are unlikely to see faster wage growth as a reason to raise interest rates, at least in the short term. But some economists still see evidence that the economy has shifted in ways that make it harder for workers to win raises. Elise Gould, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute, said that it took an unusually tight labor market to deliver stronger wage growth, and that even now there has been no significant increase in the share of corporate earnings going to workers. “Why does the unemployment rate have to be at or below 4 percent before you see stronger wage growth?” Ms. Gould asked. “Why do employers have all the leverage? Why do they have all the power? It’s because the labor market dynamics have changed.” There are signs that wage growth has leveled off recently. The employment cost index, a more sophisticated wage measure that accounts for changes among the industries that are hiring, rose a bit more slowly in early 2019 than it did in late 2018, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported this week. The most potent threat to wage growth, however, may be an end to the decade-old economic expansion. The 2008-9 recession cut short the last recovery just as wages were beginning to pick up. And while most economists see little risk of a recession today, even a modest slowdown could make companies cautious about handing out raises, said Julia Pollak, an economist for the job site ZipRecruiter. “You need two things” for wage growth, Ms. Pollak said. “You need labor-market tightness and also employer optimism about demand.” If that optimism fades, she said, wage growth could go with it. Ben Casselman writes about economics, with a particular focus on stories involving data. He previously reported for FiveThirtyEight and The Wall Street Journal. @bencasselman • Facebook
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 4, 2019 14:39:54 GMT -5
I'm sure Andrew has a decent job in real life. He seems like a smart enough guy, that's why I don't really believe he's a leftist in real life. He's just trolling, nobody with a good brain in their head is a leftist. Leftism and socialism is for the dense and those looking to hold power over others. I'm not even sure what his real political stance is, but I like to use poor old Andrew as the socialist whipping boy for my political rants since Jackel took off.
But my point still stands, people AREN'T created equal, and socialism will never change that. If all humans were equal, then everyone would be throwing touchdowns like Tom Brady and dunking basketballs like Micael Jordan, or they'd all be inventing shit like Nikola Tesla and Leonardo Davinci did.
Fact is, there's lots of mentally and physically inferior people out there in this world, and they can see what the superior people have created, and the Inferiors want a piece of the Superior Pie and they'll gladly kill you to get some. Or they'll just vote in a full scale socialist government to get some of what you've made, which is basically the same thing as being killed because you'll probably starve to death or end up in a gulag if that happens.
And then you have the Democrat politicians and the Mainstream Media who don't actually believe in the Socialst ideology but they've collaborated together to mindfuck the US citizens into thinking that the US is the world's soup kitchen, and that we have the responsibility to let all of the inferior people into the house that we've built to get some of the food we've made.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 4, 2019 14:55:41 GMT -5
I was reading a transcript, I didn't watch the proceedings. It may not have been a full transcript. To me it sounded like he admitted to not even thoroughly going through the Mueller report before rushing to put out a defense summary. He spent time doing what a defense attorney would do, which is try to "get in the mind" of Trump and explain his actions for him. And he fairly obviously perjured himself by saying he did not discuss the Mueller report with anyone in the White House, and then later admitting to another questioner that he did. Nobody, and I mean nobody should defend William Barr or think he's doing anything on behalf of the American people. That was true before Trump hired him to be his defense attorney....ahem AG, and it's even more true now. I have a feeling it'll be even more true somehow tomorrow. He is the epitome of "the swamp". I'm not going to defend Barr completely because really, I don't know enough about him and how government has truly functioned since it's inception. However, if you just break it down to the simplest level. I come away with this. Did he send out the initial letter with a particular intent in mind? Yes. Was it incorrect or false? No. Possible argument on obstruction, however, Mueller did not conclude that there was obstruction or not, which allowed for Barr to make that determination. The language that people tried to extrapolate out of the obstruction comments in Barr's letter are pretty conversation pieces only and irrelevant to the actual question because the determination is to be made by him. Would Democrats and 99% of media gone hysterical if he waited 3+ weeks to deeply analyze and compose his report, redact sensitive information, and release the document? Abso-fucken-lutely. So the charade yesterday was going to happen no matter what. Release a brief summary (which he quickly stated wasn't even a summary) and outline when the release would come or wait long enough to do a full release? Either way, outrage and hearings (I mean congress people grandstanding for the camera) would have happened either way. Just my thoughts on this particular entertainment piece from the media. The entire Mueller investigation was a fake investigation based on fabricated evidence purchase by the Democrats. Lindsey Graham said exactly that at the beginning of the Barr hearing. Barr strikes me as a no-nonsense kinda guy, and after watching the entire hearing the other day, Barr obviously views the entire Russia/Trump investigation as a large pile of nonsense. Which it is. And I'm guessing that's why he didn't bother to show up for the second day of that retarded dog and pony show.
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on May 4, 2019 16:24:18 GMT -5
I'm sure Andrew has a decent job in real life. He seems like a smart enough guy, that's why I don't really believe he's a leftist in real life. He's just trolling, nobody with a good brain in their head is a leftist. Leftism and socialism is for the dense and those looking to hold power over others. I'm not even sure what his real political stance is, but I like to use poor old Andrew as the socialist whipping boy for my political rants since Jackel took off. But my point still stands, people AREN'T created equal, and socialism will never change that. If all humans were equal, then everyone would be throwing touchdowns like Tom Brady and dunking basketballs like Micael Jordan, or they'd all be inventing shit like Nikola Tesla and Leonardo Davinci did. Fact is, there's lots of mentally and physically inferior people out there in this world, and they can see what the superior people have created, and the Inferiors want a piece of the Superior Pie and they'll gladly kill you to get some. Or they'll just vote in a full scale socialist government to get some of what you've made, which is basically the same thing as being killed because you'll probably starve to death or end up in a gulag if that happens. And then you have the Democrat politicians and the Mainstream Media who don't actually believe in the Socialst ideology but they've collaborated together to mindfuck the US citizens into thinking that the US is the world's soup kitchen, and that we have the responsibility to let all of the inferior people into the house that we've built to get some of the food we've made. He's neither smart nor decent. He's a pathetic progressive who admitted he voted for Obama and one that believes open borders are "fair". His arguments about the tax code show a complete lack of intelligence as well. It stems from his physical inferiority, but also a lack of real world perspective. He's part tin-foil hat as he claimed Trump was the Deep State candidate, part antifa claiming he would join the fight against law enforcement to stand for the rights of Michael 'gentle giant" Brown, and part parrot of Rachel Maddow. If one can be quickly duped into believing and repeating propaganda from slanted news coverage then they have to be written off as too dumb to help. TRUMP is deep state?? Haha. Like other idiotic liberals, he fancies himself intelligent when in fact, he's an emotional child. The concept of "fairness" was a brilliant strategy by the left to recruit sheep like andrew. Ironically, he demands we take more migrants in while at the same time he believes they will be treated with hostility and bigotry. He fails to see the conundrum liberals set themselves up with when trying to argue both points. We are somehow the most racist nation in the world but should also welcome every immigrant in recognize everyone wants to come here. So which is it? We are an intolerant nation immigrants should avoid or not? But the best thing about his ridiculous assertion is his lack of awareness that he is a white migrant. An unskilled laborer that will soon be without work when a cheaper version takes his job. Some younger, smarter, harder working Mexican can do twice what andrew does for half the pay.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2019 23:16:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 7, 2019 12:29:29 GMT -5
Pelosi and her ilk dont believe anything they say. They only say the things they do, because they know that their liberal followers and most of America are dumb and gullible, and they know that the Jackels and the Floyds of the world will believe every single asinine lie they say. It's just propaganda, to promote their globalist agenda. But you're right, they do live in an alternate universe. They live in a universe where they dont have to follow the same rules that we do. They're the puppet masters, living in their gated palaces that they purchased with our tax money.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 7, 2019 12:42:02 GMT -5
I'm sure Andrew has a decent job in real life. He seems like a smart enough guy, that's why I don't really believe he's a leftist in real life. He's just trolling, nobody with a good brain in their head is a leftist. Leftism and socialism is for the dense and those looking to hold power over others. I'm not even sure what his real political stance is, but I like to use poor old Andrew as the socialist whipping boy for my political rants since Jackel took off. But my point still stands, people AREN'T created equal, and socialism will never change that. If all humans were equal, then everyone would be throwing touchdowns like Tom Brady and dunking basketballs like Micael Jordan, or they'd all be inventing shit like Nikola Tesla and Leonardo Davinci did. Fact is, there's lots of mentally and physically inferior people out there in this world, and they can see what the superior people have created, and the Inferiors want a piece of the Superior Pie and they'll gladly kill you to get some. Or they'll just vote in a full scale socialist government to get some of what you've made, which is basically the same thing as being killed because you'll probably starve to death or end up in a gulag if that happens. And then you have the Democrat politicians and the Mainstream Media who don't actually believe in the Socialst ideology but they've collaborated together to mindfuck the US citizens into thinking that the US is the world's soup kitchen, and that we have the responsibility to let all of the inferior people into the house that we've built to get some of the food we've made. He's neither smart nor decent. He's a pathetic progressive who admitted he voted for Obama and one that believes open borders are "fair". His arguments about the tax code show a complete lack of intelligence as well. It stems from his physical inferiority, but also a lack of real world perspective. He's part tin-foil hat as he claimed Trump was the Deep State candidate, part antifa claiming he would join the fight against law enforcement to stand for the rights of Michael 'gentle giant" Brown, and part parrot of Rachel Maddow. If one can be quickly duped into believing and repeating propaganda from slanted news coverage then they have to be written off as too dumb to help. TRUMP is deep state?? Haha. Like other idiotic liberals, he fancies himself intelligent when in fact, he's an emotional child. The concept of "fairness" was a brilliant strategy by the left to recruit sheep like andrew. Ironically, he demands we take more migrants in while at the same time he believes they will be treated with hostility and bigotry. He fails to see the conundrum liberals set themselves up with when trying to argue both points. We are somehow the most racist nation in the world but should also welcome every immigrant in recognize everyone wants to come here. So which is it? We are an intolerant nation immigrants should avoid or not? But the best thing about his ridiculous assertion is his lack of awareness that he is a white migrant. An unskilled laborer that will soon be without work when a cheaper version takes his job. Some younger, smarter, harder working Mexican can do twice what andrew does for half the pay. Well if he believes that, then he's truly dumber than he looks. Here's one of my favorite stats concerning racism in the USA: ~ Black people make more money in the USA than they do in any other country in the world. So that means that black people in the USA have the best living conditions of any black people in the world. As a matter of fact, the USA banned slavery 200 years ago, while most of Africa still practices slavery today.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 7, 2019 12:50:05 GMT -5
Lindsey Graham talks about the Mueller report, tells it like it is.
"Obstruction of a crime that never occurred?"
Talks about how the whole investigation is fake and based on fabricated evidence that the Democrats purchased from Christopher Steele.
Graham mentions the Fisa court fraud that Obama, Comey and Hilary committed.
Hey OC, do you think we'll see Barr officially arrest and charge Comey, Obama McCabe and the rest of the dirty FBI guys for this Fisa court scandal?
|
|
|
Post by locogato11283 on May 7, 2019 16:20:11 GMT -5
Wow. Stupid fucking Democrats. $25M would’ve helped a lot of people!!
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 8, 2019 16:58:44 GMT -5
You know things are bleak when James Comey is a featured guest on CBS morning news, talking about what a corrupt guy Trump is.
Talk about irony.
The fact that Comey is on TV as a special guest instead of sitting in prison is bad news for the longevity of our constitutional republic.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 13, 2019 14:11:47 GMT -5
Aoc backtracks, claims she was just using "hyperbole" when she said the "world is going to end in 12 years if we don't pass the Green New Deal." Also, I didn't know that Jackel left Sporty to be AOC's new beta bitch? Ginger Jackel
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 13, 2019 16:23:33 GMT -5
She's basically admitting that global warming is fake and that she's been lying about climate change the whole time in order to pass the Green New Deal. Which doesn't actually have anything to do with the environment or making it cleaner, it's really just a communist wealth-redistribution program disguised as an environmental protection program.
Summary: politicians make shit up and lie about everything in order to pass new legislation.(This shouldn't be news to anyone though)
So there you have it. With the help of a timely admission by AOC, I've successfully debunked both climate change and the holocaust while I eat donuts.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 17, 2019 10:18:01 GMT -5
Adam Schiff says that investigating Biden for his illegal business in Ukraine is unnecessary. However a 2 year investigation into a crime that never took place was totally necessary.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 18, 2019 10:38:34 GMT -5
Cybergod, Jon Jones and Hunter Biden are taking a roadtrip together. Who's driving?! Pablo Escobar is driving the car.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2019 17:34:18 GMT -5
A: "I would like to see the real copy of President Obama's birth certificate" - Your racist - no
B: "I would like to see Trump's bank statements even though he has never been accused of or found guilty of a crime" - Sure, here you go.
This Country is full of nothing but stupid sheep.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 23, 2019 17:35:19 GMT -5
Breaking News: Trump engaged in a cover up!
Here is a video of Nancy Pelosi giving us all the details about this bombshell "cover up" that trump is involved in.
Also, I'm so glad Pelosi user her wrinkly old hands to demonstrate exactly what a cover up looks like before she gave that epic mic drop. Or else I wouldn't have known what one looks like.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 31, 2019 11:14:18 GMT -5
Mark Dice is one of my favorite political commentators.
He doesn't really deliver juicy scoops, but he has great comedic insight and commentary.
Here he is talking about the latest faux Trump scandal.
Apparently Trump shared a video of Pelosi sounding and looking like a dipshit, and the MSM went into full-spin mode.
|
|
|
Post by cybergod2 on Jun 1, 2019 19:22:50 GMT -5
Cybergod, Jon Jones and Hunter Biden are taking a roadtrip together. Who's driving?! Pablo Escobar is driving the car. This ain't funny motherfucker. I wouldn't be seen in public with that silver spoon fag, I got a motherfuckin' reputation to uphold. And I DON'T suck on the glass dick; I roll spiked joints with dispensary weed like any other Detroit berserker. We call 'em "51's" and only weak bitches don't know why they're called that.
By the way, Escobar has been dead for 25 years now.
Sheesh, I'm gone for two months and I got acolytes dissin' my legacy. Goddamn kids...
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Jun 1, 2019 21:44:10 GMT -5
Cybergod, Jon Jones and Hunter Biden are taking a roadtrip together. Who's driving?! Pablo Escobar is driving the car. This ain't funny motherfucker. I wouldn't be seen in public with that silver spoon fag, I got a motherfuckin' reputation to uphold. And I DON'T suck on the glass dick; I roll spiked joints with dispensary weed like any other Detroit berserker. We call 'em "51's" and only weak bitches don't know why they're called that.
By the way, Escobar has been dead for 25 years now.
Sheesh, I'm gone for two months and I got acolytes dissin' my legacy. Goddamn kids...
Haha! God damn, old man. Where you been hiding at? The knitting forum?!
|
|
|
Post by cybergod2 on Jun 2, 2019 9:44:12 GMT -5
I was going to accept a CAD design position out-of-state but the contract assignment fell through, due in part to the indefinite grounding of that new Boeing crash-prone airliner. Many of their future business projects are temporarily delayed pending the investigations & resultant corrective measures that will be required, but are not yet finalized. Actually a rather small disappointment, as I'm quite comfortable in retirement. Maybe I'll just take another local auto assembly plant driving job for pocket money, and say fuck you to all that stress....
Meanwhile, I'll write about newly-elected MI Representative Rashida Tlaib, a Palestinian Muslim who -- like her equally clueless counterpart Rep. Ilhan Omar, simply CANNOT open her mouth without thinly veiled anti-Semitism spilling out. Tlaib is a local embarrassment who hails out of Detroit's TacoTown (SW side), and somehow got elected to Congress after a few years on Detroit's City Council.
|
|
|
Post by cybergod2 on Jun 2, 2019 10:03:41 GMT -5
U.S. Representative Rashida Tlaib (D, MI) is a newly-elected Muslim nitwit from SW Detroit, who has already made a fool of herself with her "Gonna impeach the motherfucker" remark at her celebration party.
However she outdid herself recently with disingenuous and outright false claims that HER people -- Palestinians -- WERE HISTORICALLY THE FRIENDS AND SAVIORS OF COUNTLESS JEWS DURING AND AFTER THE HOLOCAUST IN WWII! She concludes her self-congratulatory speech declaring that "I love the fact that it was my ancestors that did that." This entire statement was nothing more than her clumsy attempt at "damage control", attempting to re-brand herself as anything but anti-Semitic, in the face of accusers who question her national loyalties.
This outrageous claim was rebutted in a full-page political ad in yesterday's NYTimes by the World Values Network's Rabbi Schmuley Boteach. An (slightly) edited version of this ad is shown below (with NO loss or distortion of meaning), complete with relevant facts about Arab-Israeli relations prior to, during and after the Holocaust:
"RASHIDA TLAIB DECEIVES AMERICA"
THE TRUTH:
Massacres of Jewish communities
Revolts against Jewish immigration
Support for Hitler's Holocaust
Abetting Arab states' genocidal war against the Jews
BEFORE THE HOLOCAUST: Many Palestinian Arabs made a habit of massacring their Jewish neighbors. In April 1920, 5 innocent Jews were murdered by rioting Arabs in Jerusalem. In May 1921, innocent Jews were murdered by rioting Arabs in Jaffa. In 1933, 133 innocent Jews were murdered by rioting Arabs in Safed, Jaffa, and Hebron. In the years leading up to the Holocaust, local Arabs also partook in a brutal three-year revolt against the English to stop the rescue of Jews escaping Hitler's rise. Their efforts paid off, with the British reducing Jewish immigration from a high of 62,000 in 1935 to just 10,000 in 1937.
DURING THE HOLOCAUST: Haj Amin Al Husseini -- the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and one of of the most powerful Arab leaders in Mandatory Palestine -- was an admirer and a staunch ally of Adolf Hitler. After launching a failed Nazi-backed rebellion against the British in Iraq, he fled to Berlin at the Furher's invitation where he was given a villa and a generous monthly salary. During the war, he helped recruit Muslim soldiers for the SS, and in radio broadcasts exhorted the Arabs to launch jihad against the British and "kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God."
AFTER THE HOLOCAUST: Many Palestinians partook in a genocidal war against the fledgling state of Israel. Six Arab states invaded Israel with the stated goal of "driving the Jews into the sea" -- attempting a second genocide of the Jews just three years after the first had ended. This time, however, the newborn Jewish army, the Israel Defensce Force (IDF), repulsed the invasion, reclaiming for Jews their ancient, God-given homeland.
Perhaps Rep. Tlaib should shut up long enough to brush-up on history? Just a thought...
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Jun 3, 2019 6:03:13 GMT -5
This thread is about a weak minded old man. The USS John McCain story is ridiculous. I know you guys are going to say "well why would you worry about that story?". But it's just completely indicative of how pathetic of a man we've elected.
|
|
|
Post by cybergod2 on Jun 3, 2019 12:14:11 GMT -5
This thread is about a weak minded old man. The USS John McCain story is ridiculous. I know you guys are going to say "well why would you worry about that story?". But it's just completely indicative of how pathetic of a man we've elected. Well, for once this STRONG-willed old man actually agrees with you. As much as I admire Trump's refusal to kowtow to politically correct nonsense, and his willingness to say whatever the fuck is on his mind, I think that petty crap like this McCain nonsense is embarrassing. Actions such as this are excusable for an young adolescent or pre-teen, not a grown man.
No doubt, he is a megalomaniacal, deeply flawed individual, virtually incapable of any self- criticism or awareness. No wonder he has proven to be so damned difficult to work for.
Nevertheless, his policies and vision for America are definitely compatible with most citizens, who have only the increasingly bizarre agenda of the Loony Left as an alternative. Unlike effete, lying academic poseurs like the Mulatto-in-Chief, who misled the public on topics like universal health care, gay marriage, etc. to get elected, Trump has done exactly what he said he'd do as President. He's simply not the standard, off the shelf, typical politician. He's not the money-grubbing Clintons piling up corpses along the way to riches and power, nor is he a closet socialist like Obama.
And that's why I -- and the majority of Americans, I predict -- will gladly vote for him again in November 2020.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Jun 3, 2019 13:24:00 GMT -5
This thread is about a weak minded old man. The USS John McCain story is ridiculous. I know you guys are going to say "well why would you worry about that story?". But it's just completely indicative of how pathetic of a man we've elected. I feel like you're an intelligent guy. But then you go and say the dumb shit like this. Which makes you seem like an inbred plebeian, incapable of independent thought, only parroting what you hear on your television. Come on, man. Its big-think time.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Jun 3, 2019 13:30:51 GMT -5
U.S. Representative Rashida Tlaib (D, MI) is a newly-elected Muslim nitwit from SW Detroit, who has already made a fool of herself with her "Gonna impeach the motherfucker" remark at her celebration party.
However she outdid herself recently with disingenuous and outright false claims that HER people -- Palestinians -- WERE HISTORICALLY THE FRIENDS AND SAVIORS OF COUNTLESS JEWS DURING AND AFTER THE HOLOCAUST IN WWII! She concludes her self-congratulatory speech declaring that "I love the fact that it was my ancestors that did that." This entire statement was nothing more than her clumsy attempt at "damage control", attempting to re-brand herself as anything but anti-Semitic, in the face of accusers who question her national loyalties.
This outrageous claim was rebutted in a full-page political ad in yesterday's NYTimes by the World Values Network's Rabbi Schmuley Boteach. An (slightly) edited version of this ad is shown below (with NO loss or distortion of meaning), complete with relevant facts about Arab-Israeli relations prior to, during and after the Holocaust:
"RASHIDA TLAIB DECEIVES AMERICA"
THE TRUTH:
Massacres of Jewish communities
Revolts against Jewish immigration
Support for Hitler's Holocaust
Abetting Arab states' genocidal war against the Jews
BEFORE THE HOLOCAUST: Many Palestinian Arabs made a habit of massacring their Jewish neighbors. In April 1920, 5 innocent Jews were murdered by rioting Arabs in Jerusalem. In May 1921, innocent Jews were murdered by rioting Arabs in Jaffa. In 1933, 133 innocent Jews were murdered by rioting Arabs in Safed, Jaffa, and Hebron. In the years leading up to the Holocaust, local Arabs also partook in a brutal three-year revolt against the English to stop the rescue of Jews escaping Hitler's rise. Their efforts paid off, with the British reducing Jewish immigration from a high of 62,000 in 1935 to just 10,000 in 1937.
DURING THE HOLOCAUST: Haj Amin Al Husseini -- the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and one of of the most powerful Arab leaders in Mandatory Palestine -- was an admirer and a staunch ally of Adolf Hitler. After launching a failed Nazi-backed rebellion against the British in Iraq, he fled to Berlin at the Furher's invitation where he was given a villa and a generous monthly salary. During the war, he helped recruit Muslim soldiers for the SS, and in radio broadcasts exhorted the Arabs to launch jihad against the British and "kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God."
AFTER THE HOLOCAUST: Many Palestinians partook in a genocidal war against the fledgling state of Israel. Six Arab states invaded Israel with the stated goal of "driving the Jews into the sea" -- attempting a second genocide of the Jews just three years after the first had ended. This time, however, the newborn Jewish army, the Israel Defensce Force (IDF), repulsed the invasion, reclaiming for Jews their ancient, God-given homeland.
Perhaps Rep. Tlaib should shut up long enough to brush-up on history? Just a thought...
She's definitely a nitwit, bought and paid by soros. However, the holocaust is faker than a pair of silicone tits. You honesty believe that 2.5 Jews were gassed and CREMATED every minute, for 5 straight years?? It takes much longer than a minute to cremate a body, fyi. Based on European census records and red cross stats, only about 200,000 joowz died in German camps. Mostly of starvation. Not gas. Sorry boys, do some research and you'll find out that zyklon b isn't even lethal, it's a delousing agent used to sterilize prisoners entering the work camps. The winners of the war write history, and the commie joowz won WW2. Patton said it himself, we fought for the wrong side in WW2. Thats why they iced him before he could make it back to the US.
|
|