|
Post by slaytan on Apr 18, 2019 17:50:26 GMT -5
The media keeps saying that the "Russians interfered in our election." But they always fail to describe exactly how Russia interfered. The only thing they mention as far as Russian collusion and interference is concerned, is the release of Hilary's emails. And even then, they fail to provide evidence that Russia is responsible for the hack or release of hilary's emails. Also, how is releasing the truth about someone considering to be interference? If anything, releasing Hillary's emails actually informed the people of the truth. The thing that absolutely infuriates me, is the universally accepted lie that "Putin wanted Trump to win." That is absolutely not true, absurd on its face, and can't even pass a cursory examination. "But Putin said he wanted Trump to win!" Yeah, Putin never lies. He also said, in the same sentence "I didn't interfere." Leftists choose to believe the first half of the sentence, and throw out the second half. They're both lies. The "help" they gave to Trump was an insurance policy in case he won so they could smear him with it. They were caught off guard with his victory like their Democrat subcontractors, or they would have actually tried to make it look like they were helping him. Hillary not only sold Russia a good portion of American Uranium, but their new "hypersonic" missile technology was given to them by Hillary. Russia has so much leverage over Hilary that she would have been controlled like a robot. They have enough dirt on Hilary that they could have had her hanged, even in this day and age. Russia could have ordered Hilary to invade and topple whomever they wished. They could have ordered Hillary to start a hopeless world war she was so compromised, and I'm sure she is far more compromised than we even know or suspect. Make no mistake, what Russia wants in the mainstream media gets there. If they wanted, Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper would be leading their broadcasts with "shocking revelations about Hillary" and without media protection she would have found herself charged with treason and very quickly executed. The media would have been behind it, therefore the country would have been unanimous. The right already hates her and knows of her crimes, and the left does whatever the media orders them to Where does the "Putin hated Hillary" bunch of shit originate? James Comey. James Comey, who "was" himself a communist in college, and who still to this day counts Reinhold Neibur (communist) as his hero. He counts on nobody knowing who Reinhold Neibur is. That he doesn't disown and condemn Neibur is ipso facto proof that Comey should pronounce his name "commie." Just as one could accurately peg me as a staunch conservative based on my reverence for George Patton, it is absurd to doubt that Comey is a commie. It is almost certain that he a mole recruited in college. Ever notice how almost nobody knows any true, Stalin loving communists in real life? You have your schmucks who worship Che Guevara and shit but most of those people think it's carlos Santana on their shirts. I mean intelligent, clean, well read people who think the USSR was the light of the world. That's not so true when you get high up in the FBI, the CIA, media, the whole of the Democrat party and 30-40% of the republicans James Comey "I was a communist in college." Really? While war between the US and USSR was a real threat? John Brennan "I was a communist in college" Baraq "I hung out with the Marxists in college" "Valarie Jarret" My parents were communists!" Bernie "I was a communist in college" Bill and Hilary "we traveled extensively in the USSR in the late 1960s/ early 70s." Who the fuck does that? Well, lots of democrats who immediately afterwards began a bafflingly meteoric rise to power. Scratch the surface of any highest ranking government schmuck, and you're going to find "I was a communist" or "all my friends were communists" or "my parents were communists." Just as Lord Garth told your fuck asses
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on Apr 18, 2019 21:01:14 GMT -5
The media keeps saying that the "Russians interfered in our election." But they always fail to describe exactly how Russia interfered. The only thing they mention as far as Russian collusion and interference is concerned, is the release of Hilary's emails. And even then, they fail to provide evidence that Russia is responsible for the hack or release of hilary's emails. Also, how is releasing the truth about someone considering to be interference? If anything, releasing Hillary's emails actually informed the people of the truth. The thing that absolutely infuriates me, is the universally accepted lie that "Putin wanted Trump to win." That is absolutely not true, absurd on its face, and can't even pass a cursory examination. "But Putin said he wanted Trump to win!" Yeah, Putin never lies. He also said, in the same sentence "I didn't interfere." Leftists choose to believe the first half of the sentence, and throw out the second half. They're both lies. The "help" they gave to Trump was an insurance policy in case he won so they could smear him with it. They were caught off guard with his victory like their Democrat subcontractors, or they would have actually tried to make it look like they were helping him. Hillary not only sold Russia a good portion of American Uranium, but their new "hypersonic" missile technology was given to them by Hillary. Russia has so much leverage over Hilary that she would have been controlled like a robot. They have enough dirt on Hilary that they could have had her hanged, even in this day and age. Russia could have ordered Hilary to invade and topple whomever they wished. They could have ordered Hillary to start a hopeless world war she was so compromised, and I'm sure she is far more compromised than we even know or suspect. Make no mistake, what Russia wants in the mainstream media gets there. If they wanted, Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper would be leading their broadcasts with "shocking revelations about Hillary" and without media protection she would have found herself charged with treason and very quickly executed. The media would have been behind it, therefore the country would have been unanimous. The right already hates her and knows of her crimes, and the left does whatever the media orders them to Where does the "Putin hated Hillary" bunch of shit originate? James Comey. James Comey, who "was" himself a communist in college, and who still to this day counts Reinhold Neibur (communist) as his hero. He counts on nobody knowing who Reinhold Neibur is. That he doesn't disown and condemn Neibur is ipso facto proof that Comey should pronounce his name "commie." Just as one could accurately peg me as a staunch conservative based on my reverence for George Patton, it is absurd to doubt that Comey is a commie. It is almost certain that he a mole recruited in college. Ever notice how almost nobody knows any true, Stalin loving communists in real life? You have your schmucks who worship Che Guevara and shit but most of those people think it's carlos Santana on their shirts. I mean intelligent, clean, well read people who think the USSR was the light of the world. That's not so true when you get high up in the FBI, the CIA, media, the whole of the Democrat party and 30-40% of the republicans James Comey "I was a communist in college." Really? While war between the US and USSR was a real threat? John Brennan "I was a communist in college" Baraq "I hung out with the Marxists in college" "Valarie Jarret" My parents were communists!" Bernie "I was a communist in college" Bill and Hilary "we traveled extensively in the USSR in the late 1960s/ early 70s." Who the fuck does that? Well, lots of democrats who immediately afterwards began a bafflingly meteoric rise to power. Scratch the surface of any highest ranking government schmuck, and you're going to find "I was a communist" or "all my friends were communists" or "my parents were communists." Just as Lord Garth told your fuck asses So many of them also linked to pedophilia and weird sex groups. These are some sick fucking deviants yet so many morons want to lump all politicians together.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 19, 2019 10:04:41 GMT -5
The media keeps saying that the "Russians interfered in our election." But they always fail to describe exactly how Russia interfered. The only thing they mention as far as Russian collusion and interference is concerned, is the release of Hilary's emails. And even then, they fail to provide evidence that Russia is responsible for the hack or release of hilary's emails. Also, how is releasing the truth about someone considering to be interference? If anything, releasing Hillary's emails actually informed the people of the truth. The thing that absolutely infuriates me, is the universally accepted lie that "Putin wanted Trump to win." That is absolutely not true, absurd on its face, and can't even pass a cursory examination. "But Putin said he wanted Trump to win!" Yeah, Putin never lies. He also said, in the same sentence "I didn't interfere." Leftists choose to believe the first half of the sentence, and throw out the second half. They're both lies. The "help" they gave to Trump was an insurance policy in case he won so they could smear him with it. They were caught off guard with his victory like their Democrat subcontractors, or they would have actually tried to make it look like they were helping him. Hillary not only sold Russia a good portion of American Uranium, but their new "hypersonic" missile technology was given to them by Hillary. Russia has so much leverage over Hilary that she would have been controlled like a robot. They have enough dirt on Hilary that they could have had her hanged, even in this day and age. Russia could have ordered Hilary to invade and topple whomever they wished. They could have ordered Hillary to start a hopeless world war she was so compromised, and I'm sure she is far more compromised than we even know or suspect. Make no mistake, what Russia wants in the mainstream media gets there. If they wanted, Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper would be leading their broadcasts with "shocking revelations about Hillary" and without media protection she would have found herself charged with treason and very quickly executed. The media would have been behind it, therefore the country would have been unanimous. The right already hates her and knows of her crimes, and the left does whatever the media orders them to Where does the "Putin hated Hillary" bunch of shit originate? James Comey. James Comey, who "was" himself a communist in college, and who still to this day counts Reinhold Neibur (communist) as his hero. He counts on nobody knowing who Reinhold Neibur is. That he doesn't disown and condemn Neibur is ipso facto proof that Comey should pronounce his name "commie." Just as one could accurately peg me as a staunch conservative based on my reverence for George Patton, it is absurd to doubt that Comey is a commie. It is almost certain that he a mole recruited in college. Ever notice how almost nobody knows any true, Stalin loving communists in real life? You have your schmucks who worship Che Guevara and shit but most of those people think it's carlos Santana on their shirts. I mean intelligent, clean, well read people who think the USSR was the light of the world. That's not so true when you get high up in the FBI, the CIA, media, the whole of the Democrat party and 30-40% of the republicans James Comey "I was a communist in college." Really? While war between the US and USSR was a real threat? John Brennan "I was a communist in college" Baraq "I hung out with the Marxists in college" "Valarie Jarret" My parents were communists!" Bernie "I was a communist in college" Bill and Hilary "we traveled extensively in the USSR in the late 1960s/ early 70s." Who the fuck does that? Well, lots of democrats who immediately afterwards began a bafflingly meteoric rise to power. Scratch the surface of any highest ranking government schmuck, and you're going to find "I was a communist" or "all my friends were communists" or "my parents were communists." Just as Lord Garth told your fuck asses I've read reports that Putin owned companies have donated big money to organizations like BLM. And Hilary is a massive whore that gets passed around on the reg by the likes of Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and Israel. She likes to sleep around with all of the United States' top enemies. _
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 19, 2019 10:09:03 GMT -5
The thing that absolutely infuriates me, is the universally accepted lie that "Putin wanted Trump to win." That is absolutely not true, absurd on its face, and can't even pass a cursory examination. "But Putin said he wanted Trump to win!" Yeah, Putin never lies. He also said, in the same sentence "I didn't interfere." Leftists choose to believe the first half of the sentence, and throw out the second half. They're both lies. The "help" they gave to Trump was an insurance policy in case he won so they could smear him with it. They were caught off guard with his victory like their Democrat subcontractors, or they would have actually tried to make it look like they were helping him. Hillary not only sold Russia a good portion of American Uranium, but their new "hypersonic" missile technology was given to them by Hillary. Russia has so much leverage over Hilary that she would have been controlled like a robot. They have enough dirt on Hilary that they could have had her hanged, even in this day and age. Russia could have ordered Hilary to invade and topple whomever they wished. They could have ordered Hillary to start a hopeless world war she was so compromised, and I'm sure she is far more compromised than we even know or suspect. Make no mistake, what Russia wants in the mainstream media gets there. If they wanted, Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper would be leading their broadcasts with "shocking revelations about Hillary" and without media protection she would have found herself charged with treason and very quickly executed. The media would have been behind it, therefore the country would have been unanimous. The right already hates her and knows of her crimes, and the left does whatever the media orders them to Where does the "Putin hated Hillary" bunch of shit originate? James Comey. James Comey, who "was" himself a communist in college, and who still to this day counts Reinhold Neibur (communist) as his hero. He counts on nobody knowing who Reinhold Neibur is. That he doesn't disown and condemn Neibur is ipso facto proof that Comey should pronounce his name "commie." Just as one could accurately peg me as a staunch conservative based on my reverence for George Patton, it is absurd to doubt that Comey is a commie. It is almost certain that he a mole recruited in college. Ever notice how almost nobody knows any true, Stalin loving communists in real life? You have your schmucks who worship Che Guevara and shit but most of those people think it's carlos Santana on their shirts. I mean intelligent, clean, well read people who think the USSR was the light of the world. That's not so true when you get high up in the FBI, the CIA, media, the whole of the Democrat party and 30-40% of the republicans James Comey "I was a communist in college." Really? While war between the US and USSR was a real threat? John Brennan "I was a communist in college" Baraq "I hung out with the Marxists in college" "Valarie Jarret" My parents were communists!" Bernie "I was a communist in college" Bill and Hilary "we traveled extensively in the USSR in the late 1960s/ early 70s." Who the fuck does that? Well, lots of democrats who immediately afterwards began a bafflingly meteoric rise to power. Scratch the surface of any highest ranking government schmuck, and you're going to find "I was a communist" or "all my friends were communists" or "my parents were communists." Just as Lord Garth told your fuck asses So many of them also linked to pedophilia and weird sex groups. These are some sick fucking deviants yet so many morons want to lump all politicians together. I should do a write-up on the Podesta brothers. The two creepiest Chomos in politics. John Podesta was hilary's campaign manager, and his brother Tony was the head lobbyist that landed Putin owned company the US Uranium deal that Hilary personally pocketed hundreds of millions of dollars on. Talk about a conflict of interest! Thats the real Russian collusion right there, Hilary and Putin!!! Also, the emails they keep talking about directly implicate Barrack Obama as having a large role in a child-sex trafficking ring that's run by the Democrats .
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 19, 2019 10:22:42 GMT -5
Right now the Communist News Networks are trying the spin the idea that "Trump's top aides have to 'protect' him from making dangerous decisions."
So why would we want a president who needs to be "protected" from making dangerous decisions?! Oh noes!
And they're basing this on the fact that Trump fired Comey and wanted to end the Mueller investigation. Which in my opinion firing Comey was a great decision and cancelling the Mueller investigation would have been an even better decision.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 19, 2019 14:18:14 GMT -5
Now I have Jerry "Captain Israel" Nadler on my TV saying that Barr is protecting Trump.
Well there's no evidence of a crime in the Mueller report so why would he need to be protected?
Oh, and Nadler is saying that Trump "tried to obstruct justice" by trying to get the Mueller investigation cancelled.
Which leads me to my question, how do you obstruct justice of a crime that never occurred?!
And how is Barr "protecting" Trump by simply stating that the Mueller report contains no evidence? Which it doesn't, because it's a fake investigation.
Which is why I think trump should've canceled the whole Mueller investigation when it first started.
Considering the entire investigation was based on fabricated evidence that the Democrats bought from Russian spy, Christopher Steele, I think trump would've been justified in canceling the investigation. Remember the piss dossier? That's the evidence that the Mueller probe is based on, and its fake.
But let's not forget that little Kiebler Elf-looking motherfucker, Jeff Sessions recused himself as the lead investigator of the case, which allowed them to appoint corrupt Bob Mueller as the lead investigator.
And it was Songbird McCain who took possession of the "piss dossier" from the Russians and then hand delivered it to Comey and McCabe over there at the FBI, who then ran it past Obama who then sent it to the Fisa court for a bullshit wiretap warrant.
So the bottom line is that cancelling the investigation when it first started would've been a sound decision.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 19, 2019 17:02:22 GMT -5
Hi, I'm Jerry Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. I just stopped by to let you know that if you voted for Trump, then you're an antisemitic white supremacist. However, compared to me, everyone is supreme! I mean just look at me... I'm a big, fat, sloppy, sack of crap!
|
|
|
Post by vegeta420z on Apr 19, 2019 20:02:08 GMT -5
Mueller report: no collusion, no obstruction. News media: he obstructed justice! Me: how do you obstruct justice on a crime that didnt occur??? I didn't read any of the post that I quoted Thank goodness! Now we have the absolute truth about everything! Can't wait to research the history and personal actions of the previous 44 presidents in full before finally reviewing the Mueller report so that I have a foundation of knowledge to analyze it. Or I can just skim some headlines and pass idle judgments.
99 percent of American people will do just this, and then they'll still claim that Putin "owns" Drumph and that "Russia elected our president." I find the political discussions on this forum fucking nauseating On a side note, it looks like the Mueller report will actually clear Assange of any wrong doing, since it shows that he didn't personally hack Hilary's emails. Its not a crime to publish the information once its already public. But I find it hilarious that you made this into so many posts. The media keeps saying that the "Russians interfered in our election." But they always fail to describe exactly how Russia interfered. The only thing they mention as far as Russian collusion and interference is concerned, is the release of Hilary's emails. And even then, they fail to provide evidence that Russia is responsible for the hack or release of hilary's emails. Also, how is releasing the truth about someone considering to be interference? If anything, releasing Hillary's emails actually informed the people of the truth. It's also great that you hit the like button on all your posts, lol tell us how you really feel. And now the media is focusing on the fact that firing Comey is obstruction. Comey was a dirty cop and needed to be fired. Comey was the guy who admitted that Hilary had committed treason but decided not to prosecute her because he "wasn't sure if she meant to do it on purpose." The real collusion is between the FBI, the CIA and the media to falsify information in a coordinated effort to overthrow a duly elected president. All these posts you could have just made a thread titled whatever this shit is about, like I said I Didnt read a single one of these. For fucks sake, how does releasing the truth about politicians and bringing full transparency to the public constitute as interfering in an election? The news anchors keep screaming, "Russia is attacking our democracy by releasing Hilarys emails." When in actuality, releasing the emails PROTECTS our nation's political integrity. Fuck im running out of shit to say, uuhhhm, so what's everyone doing this weekend? Also, they keep casually glossing over the fact that the only reason Hilary's emails were hacked and released, is because SHE WAS USING A GOD DAMN ILLEGAL LAPTOP TO SEND AND RECIEVE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION. TREASON!!! So now that we have confirmation that the emails are real and actually belong to hilary, when can we expect to see Hilary and Barack in handcuffs???Hey that part caught my eye and I gots to say fuck yeah, take em all trump included line them cock suckers up and well not gonna say what I was about too. I remember when that UFC fighter got in trouble for calling out Obama in his post fight interview. Check yo nuts
|
|
|
Post by vegeta420z on Apr 19, 2019 20:18:14 GMT -5
Hi, I'm Jerry Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. I just stopped by to let you know that if you voted for Trump, then you're an antisemitic white supremacist. However, compared to me, everyone is supreme! I mean just look at me... I'm a big, fat, sloppy, sack of crap! I ate a whole supreme pizza, does that count?
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Apr 20, 2019 0:41:42 GMT -5
It's amusing how smart, sophisticated people all over the US have collectively agreed to mass indulge in the delusion that people in the other party would have been appalled and mortified and put their foot down if Russia (not Donna Brasil, the IRS, the MSM, ACORN, etc) tried to help them.
And then we pretend meddling is new or unique. Did Russia "passively meddle" in the last election? Yep. And the one before that. And the one before that. And so did China. And a dozen other countries. And we meddled in all of theirs, too, aggressively, sometimes even up to the point of invading and installing friendly regimes if said meddle muppet happens to produce crude.
Meddle is the rule, not the exception, and Obamas and Clintons wrote the fucking book on it. The CIA wrote the book on it. Raise your fucking hand if you haven't meddled at this point. Jesus.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Apr 20, 2019 4:09:22 GMT -5
It's amusing how smart, sophisticated people all over the US have collectively agreed to mass indulge in the delusion that people in the other party would have been appalled and mortified and put their foot down if Russia (not Donna Brasil, the IRS, the MSM, ACORN, etc) tried to help them. And then we pretend meddling is new or unique. Did Russia "passively meddle" in the last election? Yep. And the one before that. And the one before that. And so did China. And a dozen other countries. And we meddled in all of theirs, too, aggressively, sometimes even up to the point of invading and installing friendly regimes if said meddle muppet happens to produce crude. Meddle is the rule, not the exception, and Obamas and Clintons wrote the fucking book on it. The CIA wrote the book on it. Raise your fucking hand if you haven't meddled at this point. Jesus. I am honestly baffled that this point has not been made repeatedly by Trump acolytes for the last two years
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on Apr 20, 2019 9:16:15 GMT -5
It's amusing how smart, sophisticated people all over the US have collectively agreed to mass indulge in the delusion that people in the other party would have been appalled and mortified and put their foot down if Russia (not Donna Brasil, the IRS, the MSM, ACORN, etc) tried to help them. And then we pretend meddling is new or unique. Did Russia "passively meddle" in the last election? Yep. And the one before that. And the one before that. And so did China. And a dozen other countries. And we meddled in all of theirs, too, aggressively, sometimes even up to the point of invading and installing friendly regimes if said meddle muppet happens to produce crude. Meddle is the rule, not the exception, and Obamas and Clintons wrote the fucking book on it. The CIA wrote the book on it. Raise your fucking hand if you haven't meddled at this point. Jesus. I am honestly baffled that this point has not been made repeatedly by Trump acolytes for the last two years Trump was the NEW guy and the least capable of colluding with foreign agents. He's not a lifetime politician with deep state loyalists like the Clintons, Bush's Obamas. Trump never controlled the Dep of State or the CIA or DHS or Justice and the FBI, the AG, etc, but the Obama and Hillary team did. They did during the entire election cycle. This also escapes too many people who can't understand the simple concept of Trump having no power pre-election. The laughable theory that he was trading favors on a future presidency that not a single liberal thought he had a chance to win? The most disingenuous facet of all of this. Fuck "healing" and this nonsense about letting this go - now Trump has to smoke out the traitors and try and destroy them. The only way to settle this is prison sentences for the Obama and Hillary participants.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 20, 2019 12:31:53 GMT -5
More evidence that Michelle Obama is a man:
Obama slips up and refers to his partner as "MICHAEL" on multiple occasions.
Conclusive video evidence...
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 20, 2019 13:01:28 GMT -5
It's amusing how smart, sophisticated people all over the US have collectively agreed to mass indulge in the delusion that people in the other party would have been appalled and mortified and put their foot down if Russia (not Donna Brasil, the IRS, the MSM, ACORN, etc) tried to help them. And then we pretend meddling is new or unique. Did Russia "passively meddle" in the last election? Yep. And the one before that. And the one before that. And so did China. And a dozen other countries. And we meddled in all of theirs, too, aggressively, sometimes even up to the point of invading and installing friendly regimes if said meddle muppet happens to produce crude. Meddle is the rule, not the exception, and Obamas and Clintons wrote the fucking book on it. The CIA wrote the book on it. Raise your fucking hand if you haven't meddled at this point. Jesus. Can you believe Diane Feinstein's personal driver of 20 years was actually a Chinese spy? Yeah its true but nobody talks about that shit. Everybody is spying on everybody, that's the name of the game. But that's a lot different than what the media's been accusing Russia and Trump of doing for the past 4 years. The media likes to use vague terminologies like "colluded" and "hacked the election." And then they like to point out that Trump met with some random Russian guy as conclusive proof that Trump "colluded" with the Russians. But wait a second, he's running for president and now he's been elected president, isn't meeting with foreign leaders and forgein councils part of his fucking job? So now every time Trump meets with a foreigner, he's guilty of "colluding" with them. Whatever the fuck that means. And now about this "hacked the election" business and this "meddled" in our election stuff. So if Russia hacked our election, what the fuck does that even mean? Does that mean they hacked the election booths and switched the votes from hilary to Trump??? Because I haven't seen any evidence of anything like that. Yet the News keeps insisting, with certainty, that Russia "hacked our election" without actually providing any proof. So now every dipshit and slack jawed yokel is walking around the street talking about how Russia hacked our election, like it's a foregone conclusion. What they forget to remember, is that I voted for Trump because I wanted to, not because Russia made me. And I might not have proof, but I'm sure that's how Trump received 99% of his votes. On freewill of the voters.
But As a matter of fact, since we're talking about hacking the voting machines, Goerge Soros actually owns stock in the company that supplies most of the electronic voting machines. And he's a Jewish Democrat, not a Russian Troll.
And sure, Russia most definitely "meddled" in our election, as did China, Saudia Arabia and Israel. But the News likes to use that terminology(meddled) very disingenuously to directly imply that the outcome of the 2016 election was tainted by Russia and that the winner of the election was "handpicked" by Putin. Which couldn't be further from the truth.
|
|
|
Post by locogato11283 on Apr 21, 2019 6:01:05 GMT -5
Trump wins again. Silly demos.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 23, 2019 12:47:28 GMT -5
Remember when Trump wanted to restrict travel into the US from known hotbeds of Islamic terrorism, and the media called it a "Muslim ban" and they said Trump is a racist who hates Muslims?
Well now the same News media is calling the Srilanka government "inept" for not preventing the Muslim terror attacks on Easter Sunday.
The mainstream news media is a shining example of hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 24, 2019 15:45:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 24, 2019 16:06:27 GMT -5
What do you suppose Biden is doing to this small Asian child right here? Maybe he's appreciating the aroma(Sniffing) her hair? Or maybe he's trying to suck her brains out through the top of her skull!
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 24, 2019 16:11:54 GMT -5
Biden is a great kisser: Biden will check your babie's diaper to see if it's dirty: And unlike that big meanie head Drumpf, Biden doesn't discriminate: Don't be a racist bigot. Vote Biden 2020. .
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 25, 2019 8:51:43 GMT -5
It was a fake investigation from the get-go, folks.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 27, 2019 12:41:20 GMT -5
Oi vei! Think of the children! Be a good little goy and give up your guns!
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on Apr 27, 2019 18:02:50 GMT -5
I have been telling you guys this is coming and here we are. These sanctimonious, radical liberal judges saying fuck you to ICE are going to start dropping and so are the activist, criminal city and state officials who demand those under their supervision break federal laws. This emotional cunt of a judge is the first domino and we needed this. We are in a state of civil war over immigration and the only way we have a chance is with Trump. Once he's gone, we will not have a US Attorney in the country that will enforce laws. www.foxnews.com/us/massachusetts-judge-who-helped-illegal-immigrant-escape-ice-arrest-indicted-federal-authorities-say A Massachusetts judge and court officer accused of helping an illegal immigrant flee an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent waiting to take him into custody were indicted Thursday by a federal grand jury for obstruction of justice and three other counts, officials said. Newton District Court Judge Shelley M. Richmond Joseph and the court officer, identified in court documents as Wesley MacGregor, face several charges stemming from an April 2, 2018 incident in which the pair allegedly helped Jose Medina-Perez get out of the courthouse via a back door in order to elude the ICE agent who sought Medina-Perez. “This case is about the rule of law. The allegations in today’s indictment involve obstruction by a sitting judge, that is intentional interference with the enforcement of federal law, and that is a crime," U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Andrew Lelling said Thursday. Joseph and MacGregor were both charged with obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting; obstruction of a federal proceeding, aiding and abetting and conspiracy to obstruct justice, Lelling said. MacGregor was also charged with perjury before a federal grand jury. Joseph, who has been suspended without pay, and MacGregor appeared in court Thursday and pleaded not guilty to all counts. No date has been set for their next court appearance. "As public servants, all of the officers in the court make a promise — a promise to serve the people’s interest above all else. Today we know this promise has been broken,” said Peter Fitzhugh, special agent in charge of the Homeland Security Investigations in Boston, who led the investigation. Medina-Perez, a twice-deported illegal immigrant with a fugitive warrant for drunken driving in Pennsylvania, had been in Joseph's courtroom in order to be arraigned on drug charges, the Boston Globe previously reported. RHODE ISLAND MAN THREATENED TO KILL DEMOCRATS, EAT PRO-ABORTION PROFESSOR ‘PIECE BY PIECE,’ FEDS SAY Medina-Perez was the subject of an ICE detainer -- a written request to hold an individual wanted for deportation for up to 48 hours -- and an ICE agent was waiting in the lobby of the courthouse to detain Medina-Perez after the arraignment, officials said. But during the hearing, Joseph asked Medina-Perez’s attorney “ICE is going to get him?,” according to courtroom recordings obtained by the Boston Globe in December and released in court documents Thursday. Medina-Perez's lawyer was also heard telling Joseph “ICE will pick him up if he walks out the front door. But I think the best thing for us to do is clear the fugitive issue and release him on a personal, and hope that he can avoid ICE...That's the best I can do.” “What if we detain him?" the judge asked before requesting the clerk to turn off the courtroom’s audio recorder, leaving nearly a minute unrecorded. Minutes later, Medina-Perez's attorney said his client "has some property downstairs" and needed to speak to an interpreter, which Joseph allowed. MacGregor then used his security access card to escort Medina-Perez out of the courthouse without being seen by the ICE agent, officials said. "With the recorder off, defendant Joseph and the Defense Attorney discussed devising a way to have A.S. [Medina-Perez] avoid being arrested by the ICE officer," court documents stated. FORMER BOSTON TOP COP SAYS BERNIE SANDERS' PUSH TO LET FELONS VOTE SHOULDN'T APPLY TO BOSTON BOMBER The ICE agent continued to wait in the lobby not knowing the illegal immigrant already left the building, Lelling said, adding Joseph lied about the incident to her superiors when asked about it. "The people of this country deserve nothing less than to know that their appointed and elected representatives are working on their behalf, while adhering to and enforcing the rule of law, not a personal agenda," Fitzhugh said. "The special agents of Homeland Security Investigations remain committed to upholding our promise to the public, without compromise.” Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey said in a statement the indictment "is a radical and politically-motivated attack on our state and the independence of our courts." "It is a bedrock principle of our constitutional system that federal prosecutors should not recklessly interfere with the operation of state courts and their administration of justice," she continued. "This matter could have been appropriately handled by the Commission on Judicial Conduct and the Trial Court. I am deeply disappointed by U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling’s misuse of prosecutorial resources and the chilling effect his actions will have.” Joseph was appointed Newton District judge by Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker in 2017 after several years serving as a criminal defense attorney and a prosecutor, the Boston Globe reported. After reports of Joseph’s alleged intervention emerged in December, Baker told reporters he believed Joseph should be benched while the incident was investigated. "I don't believe she should be hearing criminal cases until that federal case is resolved," Baker said about Joseph. "Look, judges are not supposed to be in the business of obstructing justice. And as far as I can tell, based on the facts as they were presented, she clearly violated the court's own policies with respect to the way they're supposed to handle continuance and involve federal immigration enforcement." Medina-Perez’s freedom was short-lived. He was arrested a month later after the court hearing and again let go, this time by an immigration judge who freed him on bond, the Boston Globe reported. That case is currently pending, officials said. The 38-year-old native of the Dominican Republic had been previously deported in January 2003 and June 2007, ICE said. His real name is Oscar Manuel Peguero, although he goes by several aliases.
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on Apr 29, 2019 11:39:06 GMT -5
Joe Biden wants to replace you. And that's a good thing.
Dont be a racist bigot. Vote Biden 2020
|
|
|
Post by verbal0knit on May 1, 2019 10:10:43 GMT -5
Barr testifies in front of Senate judiciary committee...
Diane "Lizard Lady" Feinstein:
"We couldn't find any evidence of a crime, but that doesn't mean that evidence of a crime doesn't exist."
Me:
"That's great, bitch. Now can you please take your scaley-ass back to hell, where you came from?"
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on May 1, 2019 11:09:05 GMT -5
Barr is falling on the obstruction sword it seems like. He's going to get impeached and possibly charged only to get a convenient pardon. Everybody's boy Trump is just as if not more corrupt than anyone in DC.
|
|
|
Post by MMAJim on May 1, 2019 15:13:51 GMT -5
Barr is falling on the obstruction sword it seems like. He's going to get impeached and possibly charged only to get a convenient pardon. Everybody's boy Trump is just as if not more corrupt than anyone in DC. Did you watch the whole hearing or did you get a breakdown from somewhere. Who is going to get impeached? Full disclosure, I read one breakdown on the hearing today. It was while I was on the shitter and it was from the BBC app on my phone. The article had a radically different viewpoint than however you received the information. Basically ho-hum, some guys went after him, his answers were carefully worded and effectively nuetralized most of the rigorous questions from Democrats. I don't think anyone can make a case that BBC is bias for the right wing. So I am literally curious where you came up with the hot take.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on May 1, 2019 15:45:22 GMT -5
Barr is falling on the obstruction sword it seems like. He's going to get impeached and possibly charged only to get a convenient pardon. Everybody's boy Trump is just as if not more corrupt than anyone in DC. Did you watch the whole hearing or did you get a breakdown from somewhere. Who is going to get impeached? Full disclosure, I read one breakdown on the hearing today. It was while I was on the shitter and it was from the BBC app on my phone. The article had a radically different viewpoint than however you received the information. Basically ho-hum, some guys went after him, his answers were carefully worded and effectively nuetralized most of the rigorous questions from Democrats. I don't think anyone can make a case that BBC is bias for the right wing. So I am literally curious where you came up with the hot take. I was reading a transcript, I didn't watch the proceedings. It may not have been a full transcript. To me it sounded like he admitted to not even thoroughly going through the Mueller report before rushing to put out a defense summary. He spent time doing what a defense attorney would do, which is try to "get in the mind" of Trump and explain his actions for him. And he fairly obviously perjured himself by saying he did not discuss the Mueller report with anyone in the White House, and then later admitting to another questioner that he did. Nobody, and I mean nobody should defend William Barr or think he's doing anything on behalf of the American people. That was true before Trump hired him to be his defense attorney....ahem AG, and it's even more true now. I have a feeling it'll be even more true somehow tomorrow. He is the epitome of "the swamp".
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on May 1, 2019 18:33:31 GMT -5
Barr is falling on the obstruction sword it seems like. He's going to get impeached and possibly charged only to get a convenient pardon. Everybody's boy Trump is just as if not more corrupt than anyone in DC. Most liberals have grown tired of making fools of themselves with predictions like this.
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on May 1, 2019 21:21:18 GMT -5
Barr is falling on the obstruction sword it seems like. He's going to get impeached and possibly charged only to get a convenient pardon. Everybody's boy Trump is just as if not more corrupt than anyone in DC. Most liberals have grown tired of making fools of themselves with predictions like this. Andrew is on the low end of even the liberal scale. Maybe a shade above retard.
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on May 2, 2019 9:12:33 GMT -5
4 more years of Trump is 4 more years we stray away from the rabbit hole of socialism. What the andrew types and other idiots want is a world with equality of outcome, and they see that fantasy in the garbage Bernie and Ocasio Cortez spill out of their mouth. A nonsensical model that sells well to morons that believe they are deserving a bigger piece of the pie while lacking contribution to the pie. The ONLY place where equality of outcome occurs is in PRISON. And the further we push ourselves towards the socialized model of "free" shit for lazy, unskilled andrews" the closer we get to all of us living in a prison.
Trump is the lone wolf fighting the lunatics. We are going to be fucked when he's gone.
|
|