Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 18:50:54 GMT -5
Anyways, anything else I have to learn or figure out I'll do by reading up elsewhere.
We don't come to this forum for political information lol.
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Oct 2, 2016 18:53:16 GMT -5
Jesus Christ!!! now we are going to rip him for declining to fund the New Jersey Vietnam Memorial Fund??? Toehold, can you please come up with 1 deal/event/business handling that can be factually supported by evidence that Trump ever broke 1 single law??? Cause I can come up with about 50 done by Hillary that never made the front page of the NYT. I can't believe people are so stupid that a newspaper can run an article full of only guesses, suggestions and implications... and morons in this country will take it as fact and run with it. We are screwed! They didn't say he broke a law, the point they are making is that he's not the financial success he claims to be. Don't call ME a moron, call the New York Times a moron lol. They saw it fit to run on page 1. It must not be completely irrelevant. They aren't "guesses" they are proven facts based on his tax returns. And if Hilary broke all the laws she's claimed to have broken she'd be in prison. I don't think the FBI is incompetent. I also believe this country is screwed, but for ENTIRELY different reasons... The FBI admitted she broke the law but declined to suggest charging her. If you want to see crazy tax loopholes, look at what Hillary does. Makes Trump's use of them look fair and nice and pedestrian. Just a quick example, she was collecting off of most of her charitable donations. Everytime she'd arrange donations, she would get a percentage while getting to claim the whole thing as a charitable donation. Check out this www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-20/money-laundering-scheme-exposed-14-pro-clinton-super-pacs-non-profits-implicatedJust look at what she was having David Brock do. Trump manipulated loopholes to make more money (and that almost billion dollar loss actually MADE him money). Hillary manipulates them to not only make money but launder it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 18:54:27 GMT -5
You know I still don't read what your write Cybergod, even on this forum right?? I'm just gonna assume you are saying something insulting. ANYWAYS... the other article in the Times on Trump doing possible business in Cuba when we had an embargo with them doesn't state anything has been 100% PROVEN yet, but if it is, that could be bad for Trump. Quote: The question of whether Mr. Trump sought business opportunities in Fidel Castro's Cuba is explosive not only because of how loathed the Castro government is among Cuban-Americans in the Miami area, but also because Mr. Trump has taken such a hard line against the Obama administrations' policy of normalizing relations with the island nation. As far back as 1999, in public at least, Mr. Trump called efforts to restore relations with Cuba "pure lunacy"... "Trump's business with Cuba appears to have broken the law, flouted U.S. foreign policy, and is in complete contradiction to Trump's own repeated, public statements that he had been offered opportunities to invest in Cuba, and then pass them up"Well, I guess we'll have to see if he's proven to have actually committed a crime here. But I'm sure it will come up in the next debate which should be a real fucking circus lol. Sigh. I see you're still an idiot. Maybe I shoulda had Kyle Maynard lay some facts on you. But you probably wouldn't have listened anyway.
Because you're an idiot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 18:55:27 GMT -5
Jesus Christ!!! now we are going to rip him for declining to fund the New Jersey Vietnam Memorial Fund??? Toehold, can you please come up with 1 deal/event/business handling that can be factually supported by evidence that Trump ever broke 1 single law??? Cause I can come up with about 50 done by Hillary that never made the front page of the NYT. I can't believe people are so stupid that a newspaper can run an article full of only guesses, suggestions and implications... and morons in this country will take it as fact and run with it. We are screwed! They didn't say he broke a law, the point they are making is that he's not the financial success he claims to be. Don't call ME a moron, call the New York Times a moron lol. They saw it fit to run on page 1. It must not be completely irrelevant. And if Hilary broke all the laws she's claimed to have broken she'd be in prison. I don't think the FBI is incompetent. I also believe this country is screwed, but for ENTIRELY different reasons... They have claimed he broke the law by implying his dealings with Cuba, yet can't prove them You are a moron if you form an opinion without facts They ran it on page 1 because they are politically connected and need to remain so... which means they need Hillary to win It is completely irrelevant if there are not facts involved... most newspapers will not run a story without solid facts, kinda defined by being in the news industry She broke the law. Immunity has been granted over 5 times in her case without a conviction or indictment. That is unprecedented. The FBI isn't incompetent, they know exactly what happened. The problem is they answer to Loretta Lynch / Obama, and were told to not indict. This country is screwed if they vote for Hillary because it shows that they don't care if their leader is a liar, cheat, double-talker or thief... all they care about is preserving their free safety net that they have come to depend on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 18:56:41 GMT -5
I'm about to read the entire article, but my brother read it and said that's what it states, that the losses came from his casinos. I don't know why every news outlet is saying this is a big deal if it's such a small thing, and I DON'T think it is because every one of them is a "liberal" news source. But I'll read the whole article now. What does it matter, he didn't break any laws and has since become worth over 10x his reported losses. Why does it matter to these liberal rags when it isn't newsworthy when it happens to Soros, Facebook, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Warren Buffet, Sheldon Adelson, Larry Ellison (Oracle), and hundreds more. I know you are biased against Trump and that is fine, but is boils my blood that when you ask anti-trump people one simple questions... why?... nobody has any facts or real shit to defend their point. All I hear is he's racist, sexist, stupid, a cheater, a bad business man, a tax cheat, and many others... and 8 months ago the argument against him was he was too liberal. I wish there was an IQ test to vote! If there WAS an IQ test to vote DON'T act like it would be a shut out for Republicans, cause it WOULDN'T be. I'm not saying it would be a shut out either way, but that SEEMS to be your claim here. What about The Trump University thing?? That wasn't some little nothing of an act either. The thing is, this ENTIRE FORUM is biased TOWARDS Trump. Why isn't their a SINGLE liberal on here, or even a republican who doesn't like Trump?? Hell, I personally know republicans who won't vote for Trump. I just heard that George Bush senior is voting for Hilary, which if true is pretty surprising...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 18:57:44 GMT -5
I don't see how she wouldn't be in prison if it was 100% proven she'd broken the law.
Anyways, I won't learn the facts I want to learn by debating you guys here, so I'm going to stop now.
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Oct 2, 2016 18:59:04 GMT -5
I don't see how she wouldn't be in prison if it was 100% proven she'd broken the law. It was proven, they admitted it, yet said they are declining to recommended charges as she probably didn't have the intent to break the laws she did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:01:19 GMT -5
They didn't say he broke a law, the point they are making is that he's not the financial success he claims to be. Don't call ME a moron, call the New York Times a moron lol. They saw it fit to run on page 1. It must not be completely irrelevant. They aren't "guesses" they are proven facts based on his tax returns. And if Hilary broke all the laws she's claimed to have broken she'd be in prison. I don't think the FBI is incompetent. I also believe this country is screwed, but for ENTIRELY different reasons... The FBI admitted she broke the law but declined to suggest charging her. If you want to see crazy tax loopholes, look at what Hillary does. Makes Trump's use of them look fair and nice and pedestrian. Just a quick example, she was collecting off of most of her charitable donations. Everytime she'd arrange donations, she would get a percentage while getting to claim the whole thing as a charitable donation. Check out this www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-20/money-laundering-scheme-exposed-14-pro-clinton-super-pacs-non-profits-implicatedJust look at what she was having David Brock do. Trump manipulated loopholes to make more money (and that almost billion dollar loss actually MADE him money). Hillary manipulates them to not only make money but launder it. Is that a republican funded site?? If so I'll read about it somewhere more neutral. I want to finishing watching the UFC on DVR from last night. I'm anticipating my first shit storm on this new forum once Garth and people like that enter. I should know better by now than to stay out of this shit...
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Oct 2, 2016 19:02:51 GMT -5
No idea what slant the site has, it just probably the best layman-term written article regarding the specifics on how it works.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:03:15 GMT -5
Well I'll take a look at it.
Thanks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:03:55 GMT -5
I don't see how she wouldn't be in prison if it was 100% proven she'd broken the law. Anyways, I won't learn the facts I want to learn by debating you guys here, so I'm going to stop now. Yes, by ALL means get back to that NYTimes article. You weren't learn any new "facts" there either, but you're really not looking for any.
Be sure to stop by their editorial page too. Juvenile character assassinations and sniveling liberal whining abounds.
It's right up your alley. They'll even tell you what to think, so that you don't have to.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:06:15 GMT -5
^^^^
Please don't waste your time CG.
I don't want you typing shit I won't read (actually I really don't care at all lol...)
Know a source for some choice crack??
I've never smoked any...just weed.
Time to finish watching the UFC.
|
|
|
Post by daywork on Oct 2, 2016 19:17:59 GMT -5
I don't see how she wouldn't be in prison if it was 100% proven she'd broken the law. Anyways, I won't learn the facts I want to learn by debating you guys here, so I'm going to stop now. If you or I did what she did. We would be in prison.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:26:04 GMT -5
What does it matter, he didn't break any laws and has since become worth over 10x his reported losses. Why does it matter to these liberal rags when it isn't newsworthy when it happens to Soros, Facebook, Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Warren Buffet, Sheldon Adelson, Larry Ellison (Oracle), and hundreds more. I know you are biased against Trump and that is fine, but is boils my blood that when you ask anti-trump people one simple questions... why?... nobody has any facts or real shit to defend their point. All I hear is he's racist, sexist, stupid, a cheater, a bad business man, a tax cheat, and many others... and 8 months ago the argument against him was he was too liberal. I wish there was an IQ test to vote! If there WAS an IQ test to vote DON'T act like it would be a shut out for Republicans, cause it WOULDN'T be. I'm not saying it would be a shut out either way, but that SEEMS to be your claim here. What about The Trump University thing?? That wasn't some little nothing of an act either. The thing is, this ENTIRE FORUM is biased TOWARDS Trump. Why isn't their a SINGLE liberal on here, or even a republican who doesn't like Trump?? Hell, I personally know republicans who won't vote for Trump. I just heard that George Bush senior is voting for Hilary, which if true is pretty surprising... I am not implying that an IQ test would block democrats from voting... I am saying I want intelligent people deciding our future. What about Trump University? Did he break a law? What about all of the surveys done by the paid students with a 98% rate of positive feedback? Maybe the reason why everyone here is voting for Trump is because Hillary is a pathological liar who has a plan to keep our economy heading towards debt that will collapse our country. You "heard" that GHWB is voting for Clinton... this is EXACTLY what I am talking about. You are getting your information from people who are lying. GHWB has confirmed that he will keep his vote private and has not confirmed who he is voting for.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:34:46 GMT -5
I'll look into that, but I'm not sure that's true.
I'm FAR from unintelligent dude...maybe less politically informed, but I have a Master's degree and my IQ is in the 120s.
I don't think everyone HERE is voting for Trump for that reason, I think for some reason MMA fans like Trump...maybe it is due to his aggressiveness.
MANY people I know on facebook and most people in the area I live in are voting for Hilary, as well as most people I grew up with.
I think Trump's plans will only be good for the upper class and be TERRIBLE for the middle class who Hilary is more interested in helping.
Trump is also a pretty big liar in my opinion and I think he's most interested in helping the upper class and not the middle or lower class.
The unbiased fact checker for Hilary's site says she lies less than most politicians.
I don't want to debate this any longer.
I think we both know we won't agree on anything so that's fine with me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:39:26 GMT -5
I am not implying that an IQ test would block democrats from voting... I am saying I want intelligent people deciding our future. What about Trump University? Did he break a law? What about all of the surveys done by the paid students with a 98% rate of positive feedback? Maybe the reason why everyone here is voting for Trump is because Hillary is a pathological liar who has a plan to keep our economy heading towards debt that will collapse our country. You "heard" that GHWB is voting for Clinton... this is EXACTLY what I am talking about. You are getting your information from people who are lying. GHWB has confirmed that he will keep his vote private and has not confirmed who he is voting for. By the way, this is one site that says it's true that GBS is voting for her. www.thewrap.com/george-hw-bush-vote-hillary-clinton/MIGHT not be, but then again, repubs love to share articles slanted towards their views as well. Hardly any news this days is unbiased. But I'm trying to be done here, cause every time I get into this shit it gets messy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:41:08 GMT -5
Obama's policies have hurt the middle class over 8 years, the average family is $2,500.00 poorer annually because of him... she is going to continue every one of his policies.
People that are on Facebook don't represent the people who make this country successful. They are the types to read a headline and form an opinion like you do.
Trump is going to lower the business tax from 35% to 15%. That will do more for the middle class than anything in our countries history
Please post the facts about Hillary lying less than most politicians... I would love to see it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:44:17 GMT -5
Go look at the fact checker for her site.
I don't know exactly how it works, but it is generally agreed upon that it does and that it is unbiased.
My friend who got 1600 on his SATs and is a certified genius who reads ALL the political shit he can find is one of those people voting for Hilary.
NOT a fool by ANY means.
I'd ask you to prove to me that Trump's not a liar, but like I said, I don't want to talk about this anymore with a whole bunch of people who all disagree with me.
I admittedly need to read as a WHOLE LOT more to be as informed as I'd like to be, but I'll tell you one thing, I'll NEVER vote for Trump.
My uncle is 67, a Ph.d and a SHITLOAD more informed than me and said to me the other day "Trump is the most corrupt candidate in my lifetime, including Richard Nixon".
I think he probably has more life experience and just as much political knowledge as you do.
People just have different opinions, so lets leave it at that please.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:45:13 GMT -5
By the way, this is one site that says it's true that GBS is voting for her. www.thewrap.com/george-hw-bush-vote-hillary-clinton/MIGHT not be, but then again, repubs love to share articles slanted towards their views as well. Hardly any news this days is unbiased. But I'm trying to be done here, cause every time I get into this shit it gets messy. If you are comfortable basing your decisions on info obtained like the above article, then I don't think debating is for you. If you are going to truly try to hash something out and get your point across, it is best to go with provable information and not crap that is written by info given off the record and with no ability to verify.... ask Dan Rather how your type of news worked out for his career.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:50:11 GMT -5
If you are comfortable basing your decisions on info obtained like the above article, then I don't think debating is for you. If you are going to truly try to hash something out and get your point across, it is best to go with provable information and not crap that is written by info given off the record and with no ability to verify.... ask Dan Rather how your type of news worked out for his career. There's a whole shitload more legit info out there stating shit that Trump's done wrong and shit that Hilary's done right that CAN'T be dismissed so easily, like...The New York Times for instance. Politico is also a good site IMO. I DO need to read a shitload more, but I'm NOT an idiot. Like I said, I have an advanced degree and an IQ of 122. There's just as many republicans who make knee jerk reactions as dems. It's gonna take years for me to be as informed as I want to be, and I might very well change my opinions, but like I said, people I know who are twice my age, VERY well informed and WELL educated believe Trump is a liar and a crook. Everyone has their own opinion. You can bash how I have obtained my information thus far, but I'll just continue reading reputatable web sites and newspapers and watching the news. If I find out a source is not legit, then I will look for a more legit source. But I'll never stop believing Trump is bad for this country. Now let's please end this pointless circle jerk.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:50:15 GMT -5
Go look at the fact checker for her site. My friend who got 1600 on his SATs and is a certified genius who reads ALL the political shit he can find is one of those people voting for Hilary. NOT a fool by ANY means. I don't know exactly how it works, but it is generally agreed upon that it does and that it is unbiased. I'd ask you to prove to me that Trump's not a liar, but like I said, I don't want to talk about this anymore with a whole bunch of people who all disagree with me. I admittedly need to read as a WHOLE LOT more to be as informed as I'd like to be, but I'll tell you one thing, I'll NEVER vote for Trump. My uncle is 67, a Ph.d and a SHITLOAD more informed than me and said to me the other day "Trump is the most corrupt candidate in my lifetime, including Richard Nixon". I think he probably has more life experience and just as much political knowledge as you do. People just have different opinions, so lets leave it at that please. Your 1600 friend and your uncle are fine to vote for whoever they want. The hilarious part of your decision to vote for Hillary is you are basing it off of other peoples opinions and not forming your own. If your uncle really thinks that Trump is more corrupt than Hillary, I think he may need to read some more on the subject. Trump has never taken a political donation prior to 1 year ago, and has never sat before congress answering questions on ethics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:52:16 GMT -5
Go look at the fact checker for her site. My friend who got 1600 on his SATs and is a certified genius who reads ALL the political shit he can find is one of those people voting for Hilary. NOT a fool by ANY means. I don't know exactly how it works, but it is generally agreed upon that it does and that it is unbiased. I'd ask you to prove to me that Trump's not a liar, but like I said, I don't want to talk about this anymore with a whole bunch of people who all disagree with me. I admittedly need to read as a WHOLE LOT more to be as informed as I'd like to be, but I'll tell you one thing, I'll NEVER vote for Trump. My uncle is 67, a Ph.d and a SHITLOAD more informed than me and said to me the other day "Trump is the most corrupt candidate in my lifetime, including Richard Nixon". I think he probably has more life experience and just as much political knowledge as you do. People just have different opinions, so lets leave it at that please. Your 1600 friend and your uncle are fine to vote for whoever they want. The hilarious part of your decision to vote for Hillary is you are basing it off of other peoples opinions and not forming your own. If your uncle really thinks that Trump is more corrupt than Hillary, I think he may need to read some more on the subject. Trump has never taken a political donation prior to 1 year ago, and has never sat before congress answering questions on ethics. I'm not basing all my decisions on other people, but I wont' deny that how I was raised has shaped me. I would STRONGLY assume you were raised around republicans and that it has also shaped you. I watched the debate and liked MOST of what Hilary said and thought Trump looked like a GIANT asshole, interrupting every damn thing Hilary said and just saying "wrong, wrong" when she'd say things but not giving all that many reasons WHY she was wrong. He has a "winning temperament" he says hahaha. And I doubt my uncle has read any less than you have. Everytime I see him he's got his head in a laptop or paper. This is pointless. Lets stop please. This is ALWAYS a mistake for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:56:10 GMT -5
If you are comfortable basing your decisions on info obtained like the above article, then I don't think debating is for you. If you are going to truly try to hash something out and get your point across, it is best to go with provable information and not crap that is written by info given off the record and with no ability to verify.... ask Dan Rather how your type of news worked out for his career. There's a whole shitload more legit info out there stating shit that Trump's done wrong and shit that Hilary's done right that CAN'T be dismissed so easily, like...The New York Times for instance. Politico is also a good site IMO. I DO need to read a shitload more, but I'm NOT an idiot. Like I said, I have an advanced degree and an IQ of 122. There's just as many republicans who make knee jerk reactions as dems. It's gonna take years for me to be as informed as I want to be, and I might very well change my opinions, but like I said, people I know who are twice my age, VERY well informed and WELL educated believe Trump is a liar and a crook. Everyone has their own opinion. You can bash how I have obtained my information thus far, but I'll just continue reading reputatable web sites and newspapers and watching the news. If I find out a source is not legit, then I will look for a more legit source. But I'll never stop believing Trump is bad for this country. Now let's please end this pointless circle jerk. You can't say Hillary will be good for the country when she is going to continue Obama's policies. We are $10trillion more in debt and the average american is worse off. How do those simple facts get glazed over by liberals and forgotten about?
|
|
|
Post by boboplata on Oct 2, 2016 19:59:13 GMT -5
Politics is a polarizing topic, Toehold. While you may agree with people close to you because of how much you value their opinions, academics aren't really the barometer for "smart". I would look at business owners, entrepreneurs, big or small, because these are the people that would feel the brunt of a falling economy. You are doing an ostrich & trying to ignore other people's opinion because they're not in line with yours. Being ignorant is forgivable, being ignorant for the sake of being ignorant is dangerous. Is Trump the savior that supporters tend to say? Hell to the no. The man is as repulsive as you can get, but what it boils down to is the lesser of 2 evils. And Hillary might make Satan blush. Grow a thick skin, people here are abrasive with their views but if you truly believe that what you believe in is right, there's no point to bury your head in the sand. Bring the facts & demolish their arguments. We could have a civilized conversations EVEN with the insults & the name calling. This is still basically mmaweekly. Same rules apply.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 19:59:47 GMT -5
I was raised around a bunch of republicans, you know the kind that work hard, are educated and don't have their hand out for free shit all of the time.
I paid over $250k in taxes last year and will pay more this year. Fuck anyone who says that is not enough. I drive around all day and see worthless POS that don't work and still manage to have I phones and nice cars. I will only vote for who wants to tax less and spend less.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 20:01:29 GMT -5
There's a whole shitload more legit info out there stating shit that Trump's done wrong and shit that Hilary's done right that CAN'T be dismissed so easily, like...The New York Times for instance. Politico is also a good site IMO. I DO need to read a shitload more, but I'm NOT an idiot. Like I said, I have an advanced degree and an IQ of 122. There's just as many republicans who make knee jerk reactions as dems. It's gonna take years for me to be as informed as I want to be, and I might very well change my opinions, but like I said, people I know who are twice my age, VERY well informed and WELL educated believe Trump is a liar and a crook. Everyone has their own opinion. You can bash how I have obtained my information thus far, but I'll just continue reading reputatable web sites and newspapers and watching the news. If I find out a source is not legit, then I will look for a more legit source. But I'll never stop believing Trump is bad for this country. Now let's please end this pointless circle jerk. You can't say Hillary will be good for the country when she is going to continue Obama's policies. We are $10trillion more in debt and the average american is worse off. How do those simple facts get glazed over by liberals and forgotten about? I know for a FACT they aren't "glazed over and forgotten about" by every liberal out there. Talk to a more informed one than myself and get a better answer. But its not just some black and white issue. If I'm not incorrect we we worse off when GB junior was in office than we are now so that was an improvement. Like I said, I have more reading to do, but I won't support Trump. I'd sooner not vote at all if somehow I decided I didn't like Hilary. Now you should stop posting or you will be posting to yourself soon.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 20:03:23 GMT -5
I was raised around a bunch of republicans, you know the kind that work hard, are educated and don't have their hand out for free shit all of the time. I paid over $250k in taxes last year and will pay more this year. Fuck anyone who says that is not enough. I drive around all day and see worthless POS that don't work and still manage to have I phones and nice cars. I will only vote for who wants to tax less and spend less. Oh nice, using the "hand out" card, the oldest one in the book by repubs as if that's the case for every liberal. My whole family is VERY hard working. You don't know anything about me or most liberals. They weren't all "handed" everything they got. I'm not making any negative claims about you, I'm saying people are shaped by their surroundings. Now stop with the shit slinging. I didn't direct any towards you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 20:08:38 GMT -5
Politics is a polarizing topic, Toehold. While you may agree with people close to you because of how much you value their opinions, academics aren't really the barometer for "smart". I would look at business owners, entrepreneurs, big or small, because these are the people that would feel the brunt of a falling economy. You are doing an ostrich & trying to ignore other people's opinion because they're not in line with yours. Being ignorant is forgivable, being ignorant for the sake of being ignorant is dangerous. Is Trump the savior that supporters tend to say? Hell to the no. The man is as repulsive as you can get, but what it boils down to is the lesser of 2 evils. And Hillary might make Satan blush. Grow a thick skin, people here are abrasive with their views but if you truly believe that what you believe in is right, there's no point to bury your head in the sand. Bring the facts & demolish their arguments. We could have a civilized conversations EVEN with the insults & the name calling. This is still basically mmaweekly. Same rules apply. I didn't say academics is the barometer for intelligence, but it's ONE barometer, and I was being accused of being unintelligent, which I'm not and now I'm being accused of not being hard working, which is also false and downright insulting. I admitted that I'm not as informed as I want to be on political topics, so I can't "bury" everyone I want to debate, so I don't want to anymore. I'd rather try to read more about politics and watch more news to further develop my opinions then argue with people on here. That is why I commented first only pointing out what The Times said and said NOT to respond to ME, but that quickly ended. I DON'T think Trump is the lesser or two evils, but whatever. Like I said, this is a mistake every time I do it. I did it on weekly to be surrounded by Trump supporters and bashed, and now I made the mistake again. I'd just ask that people don't make personal assumptions about how hard I or my family work. I don't reveal personal info on here, but lets just say that's a bunch of bullshit to be saying about someone you don't know.
|
|
|
Post by boboplata on Oct 2, 2016 20:15:46 GMT -5
I just read Kyle's last post & nowhere there did he mentioned you or your family as lazy. You're being too emotional here. Please post more often, we need people with a different opinions or this would just be a shitshow of callous racism. I'm neither a repub nor a democrat-I'm not even american but I have socially liberal-fiscally conservative views. And I am interested with any views. I am particularly tame on the forums as opposed to real life when I argue with people.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2016 20:25:34 GMT -5
I just read Kyle's last post & nowhere there did he mentioned you or your family as lazy. You're being too emotional here. Please post more often, we need people with a different opinions or this would just be a shitshow of callous racism. I'm neither a repub nor a democrat-I'm not even american but I have socially liberal-fiscally conservative views. And I am interested with any views. I am particularly tame on the forums as opposed to real life when I argue with people. I don't know, it seemed to me like he was pretty strongly hinting towards me and my family as being like the POS's he was talking about, but if I'm wrong I apologize. I'm the complete opposite of you: I argue more online than in real life BY FAR. Face to face I can't even stand to argue with most people. I actually hate arguing in general, but a good debate can be fun, though I prefer debating about MMA to politics. That's probably cause I'm not as informed as I'd like to be on politics though, while I consider myself to know a fair amount about MMA.
|
|