|
Post by matt on Sept 26, 2017 19:06:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 26, 2017 19:28:14 GMT -5
Dyson is jumping into the electric car market. I wonder if he'll make them wheel-less
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Sept 26, 2017 20:28:11 GMT -5
Does she sound like a female version of Jackel, or is it just me? She's nuts for various reasons, but she's right that not a lot of people realize what Sharia Law entails. She though later on backtracks away from the traditional Sharia law she was referring to and seems to them say we should take the new version which to me is WTF?!?! The article refers to "Saudi Arabia is governed by Sharia law" and then lists off various laws the country has as if they are part of Sharia law, but none of them are allowed under Sharia law in the first place. I will concede that when most people refer to Sharia law today, they are referencing the Saudi Arabian made up version that bears no resemblance to traditional Sharia law. I think a big problem is that people are letting places like SA, Iran, etc... call what they do Sharia law when it is not. When you start calling them out on it, forcing them to see their history and what traditional actually entails, you start fighting the root of Islamic radicalization which is lack of education. Why am I not surprised by this exact response?
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Sept 26, 2017 20:58:14 GMT -5
Dyson is jumping into the electric car market. I wonder if he'll make them wheel-less A car that never loses suction.
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Sept 27, 2017 0:48:05 GMT -5
National spikes in violence are misleading, as the downward trend of the past 15-20 years continues for all but a few neighborhoods. Five neighborhoods in Chicago explain 10 percent of the national increase in homicide rates. Where drug activity, gang activity, and dense populations all overlap, you get these little pockets of hyper violent areas, typically in low income or government housing. Annually there are 2,500 dead from black on black murder, 160 dead from white on black murder . . . which gets the knee? How does this racist juggernaut of a nation allow the minority to kill the majority at 4x the rate of the reverse? Seems an odd thing for a racist system to allow, eh? Somethings not adding up . . . because math doesn't go viral or play on emotions -- it's just math. Cold, sober, rational, and void of agenda. reason.com/blog/2017/09/25/violent-crime-rose-again-in-2016-for-sec
|
|
|
Post by matt on Sept 27, 2017 18:31:25 GMT -5
Only in America...can an "oppressed" RETARD become filthy rich by playing with a ball...
|
|
|
Post by boboplata on Sept 27, 2017 22:07:29 GMT -5
Only in America...can an "oppressed" RETARD become filthy rich by playing with a ball...
|
|
|
Post by boboplata on Sept 27, 2017 22:07:54 GMT -5
Another quality Peterson video.
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 27, 2017 22:29:14 GMT -5
That's still an 80 and considered a good grade by American standards today.
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Sept 28, 2017 0:04:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Sept 28, 2017 13:00:24 GMT -5
Early hominid interbreeding, and beyond.
Up to 4% of homosapien DNA came from Neanderthals. The previous assumption that our older, cronkier cousins had all died off, while partly true, doesn't tell the whole story.
In addition, other genetic tracers from Denisovans (another early hominid species) are mixed with homosapien DNA in South-East Asia.
Don't worry, it gets weirder.
Genetic research on lice has shown that successful interbreeding mush have occurred to some degree between early hominid sexual interaction with the ancestors of gorillas as we share a common type of pubic lice, which is either rare or non-existent in the animal kingdom. So, yes, likely Australopithecus raped your grandma.
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Sept 29, 2017 8:39:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Sept 29, 2017 16:53:55 GMT -5
National spikes in violence are misleading, as the downward trend of the past 15-20 years continues for all but a few neighborhoods. Five neighborhoods in Chicago explain 10 percent of the national increase in homicide rates. Where drug activity, gang activity, and dense populations all overlap, you get these little pockets of hyper violent areas, typically in low income or government housing. I think the downward trend is slightly misleading in one way, which is that it may lead people to believe that man is getting less violent. The steady drop in crime rate is all due IMO to increased video and other surveillance, cell phones (no longer is a motorist with a flat in brown town so exposed), plus better technology utilized by law enforcement, and last-but-not-least, white Americans have armed the fuck up the last twenty years . It's wayyy worse than 4 to one, because around half the "whites" murdering blacks have names like "Hector Ramon Ruis-Valdez"
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 29, 2017 17:40:09 GMT -5
National spikes in violence are misleading, as the downward trend of the past 15-20 years continues for all but a few neighborhoods. Five neighborhoods in Chicago explain 10 percent of the national increase in homicide rates. Where drug activity, gang activity, and dense populations all overlap, you get these little pockets of hyper violent areas, typically in low income or government housing. Annually there are 2,500 dead from black on black murder, 160 dead from white on black murder . . . which gets the knee? How does this racist juggernaut of a nation allow the minority to kill the majority at 4x the rate of the reverse? Seems an odd thing for a racist system to allow, eh? Somethings not adding up . . . because math doesn't go viral or play on emotions -- it's just math. Cold, sober, rational, and void of agenda. reason.com/blog/2017/09/25/violent-crime-rose-again-in-2016-for-secWhen you get into the fine print of those #s, it starts to make sense there is a racial component and Blacks get the shaft. Something like 95% of black on black murders are gang related, whereas White-on-Black murders are overwhelmingly race related with nothing to do with gangs. An overwhelming majority of the black on black murders, both parties are involved in illegal activities. White-On-Black murders, less than 10% is the black person a criminal. A lot of people say we need to fix the black-on-black murders as it is an epidemic. And I absolutely agree, that is a bigger risk to their life than a racist asshole, Cop or not, as you are likely to be the victim of crossfire basically. HOWEVER Lets say we solved that tonight, and gang related black-on-black murder and their collateral damage stopped overnight. What is going to be the excuse for the statistical difference afterwards when the straightforward numbers show white-on-black as the new issue?
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Sept 29, 2017 17:53:54 GMT -5
National spikes in violence are misleading, as the downward trend of the past 15-20 years continues for all but a few neighborhoods. Five neighborhoods in Chicago explain 10 percent of the national increase in homicide rates. Where drug activity, gang activity, and dense populations all overlap, you get these little pockets of hyper violent areas, typically in low income or government housing. Annually there are 2,500 dead from black on black murder, 160 dead from white on black murder . . . which gets the knee? How does this racist juggernaut of a nation allow the minority to kill the majority at 4x the rate of the reverse? Seems an odd thing for a racist system to allow, eh? Somethings not adding up . . . because math doesn't go viral or play on emotions -- it's just math. Cold, sober, rational, and void of agenda. reason.com/blog/2017/09/25/violent-crime-rose-again-in-2016-for-secWhen you get into the fine print of those #s, it starts to make sense there is a racial component and Blacks get the shaft. Something like 95% of black on black murders are gang related, whereas White-on-Black murders are overwhelmingly race related with nothing to do with gangs. An overwhelming majority of the black on black murders, both parties are involved in illegal activities. White-On-Black murders, less than 10% is the black person a criminal. A lot of people say we need to fix the black-on-black murders as it is an epidemic. And I absolutely agree, that is a bigger risk to their life than a racist asshole, Cop or not, as you are likely to be the victim of crossfire basically. HOWEVER Lets say we solved that tonight, and gang related black-on-black murder and their collateral damage stopped overnight. What is going to be the excuse for the statistical difference afterwards when the straightforward numbers show white-on-black as the new issue? You just fabricated your statistics out of whole cloth, and everyone knows it. Why do you do this so often? Who do you think you are fooling ? Let's hear you make something up about where you got your "information."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2017 17:57:19 GMT -5
National spikes in violence are misleading, as the downward trend of the past 15-20 years continues for all but a few neighborhoods. Five neighborhoods in Chicago explain 10 percent of the national increase in homicide rates. Where drug activity, gang activity, and dense populations all overlap, you get these little pockets of hyper violent areas, typically in low income or government housing. Annually there are 2,500 dead from black on black murder, 160 dead from white on black murder . . . which gets the knee? How does this racist juggernaut of a nation allow the minority to kill the majority at 4x the rate of the reverse? Seems an odd thing for a racist system to allow, eh? Somethings not adding up . . . because math doesn't go viral or play on emotions -- it's just math. Cold, sober, rational, and void of agenda. reason.com/blog/2017/09/25/violent-crime-rose-again-in-2016-for-secWhen you get into the fine print of those #s, it starts to make sense there is a racial component and Blacks get the shaft. Something like 95% of black on black murders are gang related, whereas White-on-Black murders are overwhelmingly race related with nothing to do with gangs. An overwhelming majority of the black on black murders, both parties are involved in illegal activities. White-On-Black murders, less than 10% is the black person a criminal. A lot of people say we need to fix the black-on-black murders as it is an epidemic. And I absolutely agree, that is a bigger risk to their life than a racist asshole, Cop or not, as you are likely to be the victim of crossfire basically. HOWEVER Lets say we solved that tonight, and gang related black-on-black murder and their collateral damage stopped overnight. What is going to be the excuse for the statistical difference afterwards when the straightforward numbers show white-on-black as the new issue? Then compare black on white crime and see which group would be considered supremacists by the numbers.
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 29, 2017 18:21:51 GMT -5
When you get into the fine print of those #s, it starts to make sense there is a racial component and Blacks get the shaft. Something like 95% of black on black murders are gang related, whereas White-on-Black murders are overwhelmingly race related with nothing to do with gangs. An overwhelming majority of the black on black murders, both parties are involved in illegal activities. White-On-Black murders, less than 10% is the black person a criminal. A lot of people say we need to fix the black-on-black murders as it is an epidemic. And I absolutely agree, that is a bigger risk to their life than a racist asshole, Cop or not, as you are likely to be the victim of crossfire basically. HOWEVER Lets say we solved that tonight, and gang related black-on-black murder and their collateral damage stopped overnight. What is going to be the excuse for the statistical difference afterwards when the straightforward numbers show white-on-black as the new issue? Then compare black on white crime and see which group would be considered supremacists by the numbers. I don't know what it is now, but at least back in the 90s and mid-00s the numbers were quite close between Black on white and white on black when adjusted for murders in which one of the victims was not a criminal. What was notable though was that in the black on white murders, a much higher percentage of the blacks were known offenders compared to white on black where a majority of the whites were not engaged in a criminal activity until the actual murder. Basically on one side you have robbers and carjackers and on the other side you have a hodgepodge of people just snapping and racists. Until recently, black on white crime was rarely racial related (with the exception of the shit in the late 60s and 70s). Now that is changing again sure, so IMO the question is why is that trending upwards again after it has been a statistical anomaly for the last 30ish years. I'd love to hear legit thoughts on it, none of that "because they are black, Odumba wanted it that way" shit like Oding CyberGarth spews. Personally I think it has to do with the re-entrenchment of poor education and broken economies in the already weakened dense neighborhoods.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2017 18:52:19 GMT -5
Then compare black on white crime and see which group would be considered supremacists by the numbers. I don't know what it is now, but at least back in the 90s and mid-00s the numbers were quite close between Black on white and white on black when adjusted for murders in which one of the victims was not a criminal. What was notable though was that in the black on white murders, a much higher percentage of the blacks were known offenders compared to white on black where a majority of the whites were not engaged in a criminal activity until the actual murder. Basically on one side you have robbers and carjackers and on the other side you have a hodgepodge of people just snapping and racists. Until recently, black on white crime was rarely racial related (with the exception of the shit in the late 60s and 70s). Now that is changing again sure, so IMO the question is why is that trending upwards again after it has been a statistical anomaly for the last 30ish years. I'd love to hear legit thoughts on it, none of that "because they are black, Odumba wanted it that way" shit like Oding CyberGarth spews. Personally I think it has to do with the re-entrenchment of poor education and broken economies in the already weakened dense neighborhoods. Shut the fuck up Jackel. Adjusted so one isn't a criminal? I'm sure that is a typical metric and is probably quite accurate as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2017 18:53:19 GMT -5
God damn it, how does this ignore function work? I have to put this deaf fuck on ignore or stop visiting this site.
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Sept 29, 2017 19:03:59 GMT -5
I don't know what it is now, but at least back in the 90s and mid-00s the numbers were quite close between Black on white and white on black when adjusted for murders in which one of the victims was not a criminal. What was notable though was that in the black on white murders, a much higher percentage of the blacks were known offenders compared to white on black where a majority of the whites were not engaged in a criminal activity until the actual murder. Basically on one side you have robbers and carjackers and on the other side you have a hodgepodge of people just snapping and racists. Until recently, black on white crime was rarely racial related (with the exception of the shit in the late 60s and 70s). Now that is changing again sure, so IMO the question is why is that trending upwards again after it has been a statistical anomaly for the last 30ish years. I'd love to hear legit thoughts on it, none of that "because they are black, Odumba wanted it that way" shit like Oding CyberGarth spews. Personally I think it has to do with the re-entrenchment of poor education and broken economies in the already weakened dense neighborhoods. Shut the fuck up Jackel. Adjusted so one isn't a criminal? I'm sure that is a typical metric and is probably quite accurate as well. It is, the DOJ #s are the overall numbers. The actual reports break them down into specific demographics, criminal history, geographical location (both of the crime and the home of everyone involved), etc... A lot of the specific data you can get from LexisNexis and a few other databases. You usually have to subscribe for the information, but if you are enrolled in a university, or know someone who is you usually have access to them with your student account.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Sept 30, 2017 4:42:23 GMT -5
So jackel just continues to make shit up. No Wikipedia, no google, just pure imagination. And not even an informed imagination that can contrive something believable.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Sept 30, 2017 4:43:27 GMT -5
God damn it, how does this ignore function work? I have to put this deaf fuck on ignore or stop visiting this site. No shit. Jackel' negative attributes are quite extreme. I, personally, wish he would die
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2017 15:51:25 GMT -5
God damn it, how does this ignore function work? I have to put this deaf fuck on ignore or stop visiting this site. Click on the MEMBERS tab at the top of the page, under "OD Refugees". A list of members will appear.
Click on the name of the member (Angelo) you wish to Ignore (or Block, as it's called here).
Another page will come up, listing a few facts about that member. ON THE FAR RIGHT IS AN ICON THAT LOOKS LIKE A SPROCKET/GEAR.
Select that sprocket. A cascading menu will offer you the option to BLOCK that member's posts.
I enthusiastically recommend this approach. If EVERYONE who is annoyed with Angelo/Jackel's nonsense did it, he'd have to find another forum to troll.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Oct 1, 2017 4:41:49 GMT -5
God damn it, how does this ignore function work? I have to put this deaf fuck on ignore or stop visiting this site. Click on the MEMBERS tab at the top of the page, under "OD Refugees". A list of members will appear.
Click on the name of the member (Angelo) you wish to Ignore (or Block, as it's called here).
Another page will come up, listing a few facts about that member. ON THE FAR RIGHT IS AN ICON THAT LOOKS LIKE A SPROCKET/GEAR.
Select that sprocket. A cascading menu will offer you the option to BLOCK that member's posts.
I enthusiastically recommend this approach. If EVERYONE who is annoyed with Angelo/Jackel's nonsense did it, he'd have to find another forum to troll.
Well he may find a dumber forum where someone may believe his bullshit. Here he is contained, like a bullshit bomb in a barrel. Stay on, Angeload.
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Oct 1, 2017 10:22:33 GMT -5
www.nytimes.com/2017/09/30/opinion/hugh-hefner.html?mwrsm=FacebookWish I was edgy enough to do a hot take on Hugh Hefner being a capitalist, sexist pig. Alas, I'm just a lowly plebe parroting the party line of tasteful, artistic nudity in a puritanical society being a positive thing and creating career springboards for untold thousands and thousands of people both in production/publishing/photography as well as modeling/acting.
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Oct 1, 2017 10:24:22 GMT -5
Importing people who are culturally acclimated to peasantry and who willingly embrace ruling class hierarchy is the end game. These people will roll over for a Bernie, a Clinton, a Warren in a heartbeat and wholly support a large scale transition to socialized everything.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Oct 1, 2017 10:44:13 GMT -5
Importing people who are culturally acclimated to peasantry and who willingly embrace ruling class hierarchy is the end game. These people will roll over for a Bernie, a Clinton, a Warren in a heartbeat and wholly support a large scale transition to socialized everything. Let's say that you're rich and powerful and that you've decided to enslave an entire race of people for the purposes of shining your penny loafers and mopping the toilets in your palace... Who do you choose? Right off the bat, I'm picking the opposite of whatever jackel is...
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Oct 1, 2017 11:00:26 GMT -5
Click on the MEMBERS tab at the top of the page, under "OD Refugees". A list of members will appear.
Click on the name of the member (Angelo) you wish to Ignore (or Block, as it's called here).
Another page will come up, listing a few facts about that member. ON THE FAR RIGHT IS AN ICON THAT LOOKS LIKE A SPROCKET/GEAR.
Select that sprocket. A cascading menu will offer you the option to BLOCK that member's posts.
I enthusiastically recommend this approach. If EVERYONE who is annoyed with Angelo/Jackel's nonsense did it, he'd have to find another forum to troll.
Well he may find a dumber forum where someone may believe his bullshit. Here he is contained, like a bullshit bomb in a barrel. Stay on, Angeload. I don't know if he can aim much lower than this place for mean IQ.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Oct 1, 2017 11:36:43 GMT -5
Well he may find a dumber forum where someone may believe his bullshit. Here he is contained, like a bullshit bomb in a barrel. Stay on, Angeload. I don't know if he can aim much lower than this place for mean IQ. Oh noes, the wigger has a butthurt.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Oct 1, 2017 12:28:18 GMT -5
I don't know if he can aim much lower than this place for mean IQ. Oh noes, the wigger has a butthurt. Wigger huh? Hilarious. Did you take a friendly little jab at everyone (including myself) personally? Clearly you are a genuine grade A genius, so I apologize.
|
|