|
|
Post by matt on Jun 2, 2017 18:12:49 GMT -5
Why would anyone knowingly agree to a bad deal? That's just fucking stupid, you wouldn't. The Paris climate accord was written to specifically fuck the US over financially, all while other countries directly benefit from our losses. Why should foreign countries decide what we do on our land? The Paris climate accord has a special global committee that is capable of over riding our countries constitution. That is the definition of one world government. Why do so many Americans want to give away what their families for generations worked so hard for? Why do so many Americans want to give away other American's freedom and financial earnings? Should later generations really be looking to reap the benefits of previous ones? Shouldn't each generation have to make their own way and fully earn what they get? Is this a real fucking question? Or are you just pushing buttons? Ok, so you're asking me why should future generations enjoy the success of their family members who were responsible, worked hard, and made sound financial decisions that would later build a bridge for their children to carry on that successful mold into future generations? Real question? Ok, I'll ask you a question...What makes you think you, or anyone else is entitled to the money, property or anything else my family or I have earned? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2017 18:50:59 GMT -5
Just watched Kathy Griffin's half hour press conference. It was a train wreck. A train wreck in which somehow she comes out as the victim. And her lawyer was basically just running her mouth about Trump for the first 10 minutes of the press conference. It was amazingly annoying. Somehow her actions costing her jobs is somehow the fault of old white men. I seriously hope that if the Trump family really is trying to destroy her career that they are 100% successful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Jun 2, 2017 20:01:37 GMT -5
Should later generations really be looking to reap the benefits of previous ones? Shouldn't each generation have to make their own way and fully earn what they get? Is this a real fucking question? Or are you just pushing buttons? Ok, so you're asking me why should future generations enjoy the success of their family members who were responsible, worked hard, and made sound financial decisions that would later build a bridge for their children to carry on that successful mold into future generations? Real question? Ok, I'll ask you a question...What makes you think you, or anyone else is entitled to the money, property or anything else my family or I have earned? You can't fight evolution. People with high IQ, good genes, even dumb luck (random mutation) have a higher survival and procreation rate, and said progeny have inherent advantages . . . let's go ahead and call it privlidge just to trigger some folks, that no rally or legislation or hiring quota can untie. People are smarter than you, better looking than you, 2" taller, with a higher IQ and a more stable home environment with strong role models and a cultural emphasis on discipline and achievement. You. Can't. Win. This. Game. Your only hope is that one of these people sees fit to hire you. Maybe one of these people dumps their side chick so you've got a chance at a rebound fuck. Your life of hail mary's is hard to swallow . . . so, you work to undermine the whole system. Masculinity, financial success, heterosexuality, marriage, traditional families, even whiteness itself must all become vices. The beta must destroy the greatness of western culture and recreate the world in his own image. |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jun 2, 2017 20:37:17 GMT -5
Is this a real fucking question? Or are you just pushing buttons? Ok, so you're asking me why should future generations enjoy the success of their family members who were responsible, worked hard, and made sound financial decisions that would later build a bridge for their children to carry on that successful mold into future generations? Real question? Ok, I'll ask you a question...What makes you think you, or anyone else is entitled to the money, property or anything else my family or I have earned? You can't fight evolution. People with high IQ, good genes, even dumb luck (random mutation) have a higher survival and procreation rate, and said progeny have inherent advantages . . . let's go ahead and call it privlidge just to trigger some folks, that no rally or legislation or hiring quota can untie. People are smarter than you, better looking than you, 2" taller, with a higher IQ and a more stable home environment with strong role models and a cultural emphasis on discipline and achievement. You. Can't. Win. This. Game. Your only hope is that one of these people sees fit to hire you. Maybe one of these people dumps their side chick so you've got a chance at a rebound fuck. Your life of hail mary's is hard to swallow . . . so, you work to undermine the whole system. Masculinity, financial success, heterosexuality, marriage, traditional families, even whiteness itself must all become vices. The beta must destroy the greatness of western culture and recreate the world in his own image. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jun 2, 2017 20:45:55 GMT -5
Bilderberg meeting today. Primary topic of discussion: how to deal with Trump. This interests me. I know there's a lot of conspiracy theory around Bilderberg. And I'm sure a lot of it is blown out of proportion. However. It genuinely interests me that this is the first time since I've ever started following Bilderberg that a United States president has been the primary focus of the conversation. The reason I find it interesting it's because these people at Bilderberg are supposedly the people who run the whole fucking planet. So I find it intriguing that none of the previous presidents were considered a topic of concern. Almost like this is the first president we've had in my lifetime who wasn't bought and paid for before the election even started. Hillary has actually attended multiple Bilderberg meetings. I wonder if she got invited this year? I bet you she didn't. LOL. Cunt. Well, none of the previous presidents were a topic for concern because they were all elected as planned, until now... oh, and then of course there was JFK, who wasn't exactly going along with the agenda... Let me list some bilderberg members off the top of my head: Soros Kissinger Rothschild Bill Clinton Barack Obama George w Bush jr Angela Merkel Not bilderberg members(off the top of my head): Putin 45 ...also, Bill Clinton was elected president shortly after his very first bilderberg meeting, in which he met with George Soros to discuss NAFTA. |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jun 2, 2017 21:02:45 GMT -5
Larry Silverstein purchased the WTC from the Rockefellers, 6 months prior to September 11 2001. The Rockefeller's are also bilderberg members. Silverstein promptly switched security companies for the property after the purchase, the new security company was run by George w Bush Jr's cousin. Milton Bush or some shit... Silverstein is most memorable for saying building 7 was going to be "pulled" while talking to a news reporter. Building 7 was also announced to have collapsed during a European news broadcast while the building was still standing in plane sight. Jackel, i found some random kid's homework, can you fact check it for me??? Haha homenaturereport.blogspot.com/2009/02/wtcbush-clinton-silverstein-bilderberg.html?m=1Fact check this too, jackel... Interesting read about the impact points where the planes penetrated the two towers...so sexual... www.bollyn.com/9-11-planes-flew-directly-into-secure-computer-rooms-in-both-towers |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Jun 2, 2017 21:09:40 GMT -5
Wait are you saying the previous security for the skyscraper had a system that would take out a plane before they hit it? WTF does changing what rent-a-cop you use help against an airplane?
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jun 2, 2017 21:13:07 GMT -5
Wait are you saying the previous security for the skyscraper had a system that would take out a plane before they hit it? WTF does changing what rent-a-cop you use help against an airplane? I know your ears don't work, but maybe you can put your eyes to work and fact check those links for me? |
|
|
|
Post by PatSox on Jun 3, 2017 0:13:22 GMT -5
Should later generations really be looking to reap the benefits of previous ones? Shouldn't each generation have to make their own way and fully earn what they get? Is this a real fucking question? Or are you just pushing buttons? Ok, so you're asking me why should future generations enjoy the success of their family members who were responsible, worked hard, and made sound financial decisions that would later build a bridge for their children to carry on that successful mold into future generations? Real question? Ok, I'll ask you a question...What makes you think you, or anyone else is entitled to the money, property or anything else my family or I have earned? It just seems like charity. Like a generational hand-out. Bunch of entitled twat stains living off the backs of their more personally accountable, hard working predecessors We should be happy that something intervenes and forces them to make their own way. Sink or swim.......Okay yeah.........I'm totally pushing buttons |
|
|
|
Post by boboplata on Jun 3, 2017 2:30:31 GMT -5
My initial reaction to Trump's decision with the Paris accord: "Good".
I never really delve into the mattee but my understanding is the same with baph and floyd. Industrialized countries with huge manufacturing markets like China won't give a shit while US industries have to suffer while footing the bill.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2017 6:45:40 GMT -5
Why would anyone knowingly agree to a bad deal? That's just fucking stupid, you wouldn't. The Paris climate accord was written to specifically fuck the US over financially, all while other countries directly benefit from our losses. Why should foreign countries decide what we do on our land? The Paris climate accord has a special global committee that is capable of over riding our countries constitution. That is the definition of one world government. Why do so many Americans want to give away what their families for generations worked so hard for? Why do so many Americans want to give away other American's freedom and financial earnings? Paris agreement is voluntary, they can't make us do anything. That is one of the reasons Tucker Carlson pointed out as to why it is stupid. China and India don't need to do shit and China was planning on curbing emissions by 2030 or some shit while we are going to be cutting jobs to make our voluntary rate reductions. No other countris are going to tell us what to do. Well, they could tell us but it wouldn't mean anything. |
|
|
|
Post by PatSox on Jun 3, 2017 7:23:45 GMT -5
The more I learn about the Paris Accord and the more that transpires the more I'm actually liking where it's going. I don't think this was the intended result, but it's really becoming an individual state choice now
Many states coming out saying they're still going to honor the deal and meet those standards, etc etc, is mostly political grandstanding, just as much as Trump's decision was mostly pandering to his base, with an eye towards a possible re-election in 2020. But whatever, the result is that the states that were getting wacked hard by this, now have some of the relief they wanted. And the ones where it didn't matter much and were okay staying in those parameters can make their own choice to keep doing so.
State choice over Federal, in certain cases like this one, can be exactly what's needed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2017 7:37:33 GMT -5
The more I learn about the Paris Accord and the more that transpires the more I'm actually liking where it's going. I don't think this was the intended result, but it's really becoming an individual state choice now Many states coming out saying they're still going to honor the deal and meet those standards, etc etc, is mostly political grandstanding, just as much as Trump's decision was mostly pandering to his base, with an eye towards a possible re-election in 2020. But whatever, the result is that the states that were getting wacked hard by this, now have some of the relief they wanted. And the ones where it didn't matter much and were okay staying in those parameters can make their own choice to keep doing so. State choice over Federal, in certain cases like this one, can be exactly what's needed This is what irks me. This is how it should be. All of these companies whining and bitching about Trump pulling out of the deal and acting like they can't cut emissions on their own. Trump isn't stopping you fuck faces, do it anyway. If it is that important these people should do it regardless, what does a meaningless signed piece of paper mean? Absolutely dick. I am leaning towards the assumption that a lot of these companies were hoping to cash in on federal funds so they wanted to stay in the agreement. Yay, more money for us! Wait, Trump doesn't want to subsidize my company? Boo!!!! We will do it anyway! That is what they are saying but in reality it is politics, they want to pressure Trump and force his hand by painting him the evil corporate guy so he rejoins the agreement and they get paid... |
|
|
|
Post by ocmmafan on Jun 3, 2017 8:30:27 GMT -5
The more I learn about the Paris Accord and the more that transpires the more I'm actually liking where it's going. I don't think this was the intended result, but it's really becoming an individual state choice now Many states coming out saying they're still going to honor the deal and meet those standards, etc etc, is mostly political grandstanding, just as much as Trump's decision was mostly pandering to his base, with an eye towards a possible re-election in 2020. But whatever, the result is that the states that were getting wacked hard by this, now have some of the relief they wanted. And the ones where it didn't matter much and were okay staying in those parameters can make their own choice to keep doing so. State choice over Federal, in certain cases like this one, can be exactly what's needed This is what irks me. This is how it should be. All of these companies whining and bitching about Trump pulling out of the deal and acting like they can't cut emissions on their own. Trump isn't stopping you fuck faces, do it anyway. If it is that important these people should do it regardless, what does a meaningless signed piece of paper mean? Absolutely dick. I am leaning towards the assumption that a lot of these companies were hoping to cash in on federal funds so they wanted to stay in the agreement. Yay, more money for us! Wait, Trump doesn't want to subsidize my company? Boo!!!! We will do it anyway! That is what they are saying but in reality it is politics, they want to pressure Trump and force his hand by painting him the evil corporate guy so he rejoins the agreement and they get paid... And public perception from the dishonest media is built around this mantra of Trump doesn't want to help the planet. Which is BS because that isn't what the Paris accord is about, and should be easy for anyone to uncover with a little bit of reading. The level of dishonesty right now with elected officials AND the media is at such an all time high that everyone, literally everyone, does need to discuss issues so they can find some truth. Having politicians and cooperate leaders come out and say this will KILL children, etc? We will "burn up"? Best case scenario under the most liberal reading of what this can accomplish with India and China on board is still lowering the temperature by 1 degree over how many fucking years? And that's taking it like 6 steps of every domino falling in place where the science is very foggy and many disagree with each other. This kind of ridiculous rhetoric should be confronted and those people held accountable. The same people complaining Trump is in bed with big business are complaining here. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2017 9:53:30 GMT -5
What, no comments about the Pedophile State guys getting some
well-deserved jail Time?
From the Associated Press:
3 ex-Penn State Officials Get Jail in Sandusky Case
by Marc Levy & Michael Rubinkam
"Harrisburg, Pa. — Penn State’s former president and two other ex-administrators were sentenced Friday to at least two months in jail for failing to report a child sexual abuse allegation against Jerry Sandusky a decade before his arrest engulfed the university in scandal and brought down football coach Joe Paterno.
“They ignored the opportunity to put an end to his crimes when they had a chance to do so,” Judge John Boccabella said as he lambasted the three defendants and the Hall of Fame coach over a delay that prosecutors say enabled Sandusky to molest four more boys.
Boccabella said he was “appalled that the common sense to make a phone call did not occur,” a transgression that “sort of robs my faith of who we are as adults and where we are going.”
Former President Graham Spanier, 68, was sentenced to four to 12 months, with the first two in jail and the rest under house arrest. He was convicted of child endangerment.
Former athletic director Tim Curley, 63, received a sentence of seven to 23 months, with three in jail. Former vice president Gary Schultz, 67, was given six to 23 months, with two months behind bars. They pleaded guilty to child endangerment.
The three are to report to jail July 15.
They all apologized in the courtroom to Sandusky’s victims before the sentences were hand down.
Spanier said he regretted that “I did not intervene more forcefully.” Schultz said: “It really sickens me to think I might have played a part in children being hurt.”
The case hinged on coaching assistant Mike McQueary’s claim that he witnessed Sandusky — a retired member of the coaching staff who ran a charity for youngsters — molesting a boy in the team showers in 2001. Prosecutors said that after McQueary recounted what he saw, the three administrators decided not to report it to authorities to protect the university’s reputation.
Sandusky was not arrested until 2011, after a prosecutor got an anonymous email tip. Sandusky was found guilty the next year of sexually abusing 10 boys and is serving 30 to 60 years in prison.
Penn State has paid out nearly a quarter-billion dollars in fines, settlements and other costs associated with the scandal, and the football program suffered heavy NCAA sanctions. More than 100 of Paterno’s victories were briefly erased from the record books.
Both the judge and prosecutors Friday thrust blame onto Paterno himself. Paterno was fired but never charged with a crime; he died of lung cancer at age 85 two months after Sandusky’s arrest.
Paterno “could have made that phone call without so much as getting his hands dirty,” Boccabella said. “Why he didn’t is beyond me.”
Prosecutor Patrick Schulte said Curley at one point had drawn up a plan to report Sandusky to state authorities, but “something changed after talking to coach Paterno.”
All three men have denied they were told the encounter in the shower was sexual in nature."
|
|
|
|
Post by PatSox on Jun 3, 2017 14:34:47 GMT -5
This is what irks me. This is how it should be. All of these companies whining and bitching about Trump pulling out of the deal and acting like they can't cut emissions on their own. Trump isn't stopping you fuck faces, do it anyway. If it is that important these people should do it regardless, what does a meaningless signed piece of paper mean? Absolutely dick. I am leaning towards the assumption that a lot of these companies were hoping to cash in on federal funds so they wanted to stay in the agreement. Yay, more money for us! Wait, Trump doesn't want to subsidize my company? Boo!!!! We will do it anyway! That is what they are saying but in reality it is politics, they want to pressure Trump and force his hand by painting him the evil corporate guy so he rejoins the agreement and they get paid... And public perception from the dishonest media is built around this mantra of Trump doesn't want to help the planet. Which is BS because that isn't what the Paris accord is about, and should be easy for anyone to uncover with a little bit of reading. The level of dishonesty right now with elected officials AND the media is at such an all time high that everyone, literally everyone, does need to discuss issues so they can find some truth. Having politicians and cooperate leaders come out and say this will KILL children, etc? We will "burn up"? Best case scenario under the most liberal reading of what this can accomplish with India and China on board is still lowering the temperature by 1 degree over how many fucking years? And that's taking it like 6 steps of every domino falling in place where the science is very foggy and many disagree with each other. This kind of ridiculous rhetoric should be confronted and those people held accountable. The same people complaining Trump is in bed with big business are complaining here. Didn't the MIT study Trump referenced actually say that if we do certain things, like what's in the accord, the temp will go up less than one degree by the year 2100, but if we don't do anything, the overall temp could go up 5 degrees or more, which would be catastrophic??? |
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Jun 3, 2017 16:28:01 GMT -5
That's reeeeeaaaallly hard to believe. 5 degrees by 2100 means the end of life as we know it within the next 80 years. This is the same kind of alarmist bullshit Al Gore was screaming about 15 years ago and none of those predictive models turned out to be accurate at all. It also assumes with utter ridiculousness that zero technology advancements emerge in the next 83 years that will help capture, reduce, or even eliminate emissions. That is the height of absurdity. Finally, pulling out of the Paris Accord does nothing to prevent anyone, any company, any city/state/nation from working to reduce emissions and improve standards at their own rate in whatever way seems best to them. The implication that we all just start dumping toxic waste in the rivers now that we backed out of Paris is fucktarded. Liberals always do this. If you don't support the massive, continent-wide, mandatory program, then you must hate babies and the Earth and want the opposite of everything good. Um . . . no, I just think your program is sloppy and crude and you've got a bad track record, bud. I've been to the DMV and the VA and the Post Office and Public Schools and I don't want you fucks in charge of saving the Earth, because you fuck up 75% of the shit you get your mitts on. Nobody is denying the need to get better, to innovate, to clean up -- we're just saying Paris is bullshit. Paris exemptions for the worst offenders is bullshit. All these globalist pacts are bullshit and the US is one of the only people who ends up living up to our obligations while the rest slack off, do 1/2 what they promised, and take our money. We're already one of the leading nations on the planet in terms of reducing emissions and developing alternative energy tech. We're already doing more than everyone else. Paris changes nothing. Fuck the narrative.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Jun 3, 2017 17:39:25 GMT -5
And public perception from the dishonest media is built around this mantra of Trump doesn't want to help the planet. Which is BS because that isn't what the Paris accord is about, and should be easy for anyone to uncover with a little bit of reading. The level of dishonesty right now with elected officials AND the media is at such an all time high that everyone, literally everyone, does need to discuss issues so they can find some truth. Having politicians and cooperate leaders come out and say this will KILL children, etc? We will "burn up"? Best case scenario under the most liberal reading of what this can accomplish with India and China on board is still lowering the temperature by 1 degree over how many fucking years? And that's taking it like 6 steps of every domino falling in place where the science is very foggy and many disagree with each other. This kind of ridiculous rhetoric should be confronted and those people held accountable. The same people complaining Trump is in bed with big business are complaining here. Didn't the MIT study Trump referenced actually say that if we do certain things, like what's in the accord, the temp will go up less than one degree by the year 2100, but if we don't do anything, the overall temp could go up 5 degrees or more, which would be catastrophic??? However the study uses the adjusted temperatures that was shown to have been adjusted like the vaccine-autism study that linked them. In reality there was no increase in the last 200 years, and actually a decrease. |
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Jun 3, 2017 18:10:52 GMT -5
Well a van mowed down 20+ on London Bridge. Supposedly about 500 meters away 3 people had throats cuts, and reports of gunfire elsewhere and police are tweeting for people to run and hide.
|
|
|
|
Post by PatSox on Jun 3, 2017 18:26:02 GMT -5
Well a van mowed down 20+ on London Bridge. Supposedly about 500 meters away 3 people had throats cuts, and reports of gunfire elsewhere and police are tweeting for people to run and hide. Actually it was a giant person that mowed down 20 vans. And it was the Waterloo Bridge. And nobody had their throats cut, but one guy did have a nick on his neck, but authorities believe it was probably self inflicted while shaving, but are yet to rule out other possibilities See...I can do that shit too, jackel |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2017 18:48:32 GMT -5
Well a van mowed down 20+ on London Bridge. Supposedly about 500 meters away 3 people had throats cuts, and reports of gunfire elsewhere and police are tweeting for people to run and hide. Well I guess that debunks the anti-gunner argument here in the USA that says "the people don't need guns, the police force will protect them."
That would make a cool slogan on British Police vehicles: We Serve and Protect; Run and Hide Until We Can Find You.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Jun 3, 2017 19:04:39 GMT -5
At this point I'm willing to admit I was wrong and we should adopt the open-borders, pro-Muslim, multiculturalist approach of Europe and quit being totes bigots.
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jun 3, 2017 20:07:06 GMT -5
That's reeeeeaaaallly hard to believe. 5 degrees by 2100 means the end of life as we know it within the next 80 years. This is the same kind of alarmist bullshit Al Gore was screaming about 15 years ago and none of those predictive models turned out to be accurate at all. It also assumes with utter ridiculousness that zero technology advancements emerge in the next 83 years that will help capture, reduce, or even eliminate emissions. That is the height of absurdity. Finally, pulling out of the Paris Accord does nothing to prevent anyone, any company, any city/state/nation from working to reduce emissions and improve standards at their own rate in whatever way seems best to them. The implication that we all just start dumping toxic waste in the rivers now that we backed out of Paris is fucktarded. Liberals always do this. If you don't support the massive, continent-wide, mandatory program, then you must hate babies and the Earth and want the opposite of everything good. Um . . . no, I just think your program is sloppy and crude and you've got a bad track record, bud. I've been to the DMV and the VA and the Post Office and Public Schools and I don't want you fucks in charge of saving the Earth, because you fuck up 75% of the shit you get your mitts on. Nobody is denying the need to get better, to innovate, to clean up -- we're just saying Paris is bullshit. Paris exemptions for the worst offenders is bullshit. All these globalist pacts are bullshit and the US is one of the only people who ends up living up to our obligations while the rest slack off, do 1/2 what they promised, and take our money. We're already one of the leading nations on the planet in terms of reducing emissions and developing alternative energy tech. We're already doing more than everyone else. Paris changes nothing. Fuck the narrative. Exemptions for China and Russia? I'd argue that China and Russia weren't granted "special exemptions." I think its more like...they simply don't have to abide by this accord because they're not part of the group. So let's suspend disbelief for just a moment... just a freaking moment... and we'll pretend that 911 was an inside job, pulled of by the CIA, and that the NWO is real...and bilderberg is indeed the shadow government behind it all... calling all the shots. And they wish to dissolve the United States, and merge the Canadian and Mexican territories with what was once known as the United States...and then the idea would be to, obviously, merge with the EU... And After 911, any global opposition from the middle East was basically shut down. Toppled. The middle East is basically just in limbo right now, waiting for this North American/EU merger so that the newly formed global alliance can lay claim to the entire middle Eastern region... uniting the North American continent with the EU and the middle East region in a one size fits all communist dictatorship...afterall, the people in the US and Europe have already been conditioned, errr, uh, multiculturalized for this merger. So that leaves opposition from what...China and Russia? India, maybe? ![]() ![]() . Attachments:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2017 20:49:51 GMT -5
Well a van mowed down 20+ on London Bridge. Supposedly about 500 meters away 3 people had throats cuts, and reports of gunfire elsewhere and police are tweeting for people to run and hide. Actually it was a giant person that mowed down 20 vans. And it was the Waterloo Bridge. And nobody had their throats cut, but one guy did have a nick on his neck, but authorities believe it was probably self inflicted while shaving, but are yet to rule out other possibilities See...I can do that shit too, jackel I don't know if it is because I am high as fuck but I found this shit ridiculously hilarious. |
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Jun 3, 2017 21:46:53 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2017 22:46:27 GMT -5
We would ALL miss jackel. Except OC, I think he GENUINELY hates him. Jackal is a staple of the forum.  |
|
|
|
Post by ToNoAvail on Jun 3, 2017 23:47:56 GMT -5
We would ALL miss jackel. Except OC, I think he GENUINELY hates him. Jackal is a staple of the forum. I will respect your opinion when you graduate. |
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Jun 4, 2017 7:19:22 GMT -5
"But we elected a Muslim mayor! These things were supposed to stop because we're not islamophobes! We need a Muslim Prime Minister, that'll really stop them!"
|
|
|
|
Post by Baph on Jun 4, 2017 11:22:33 GMT -5
I think if we just enact sharia law this will finally become the land of peace and tolerance we were promised.
#Make England Syria Again
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jun 4, 2017 11:35:02 GMT -5
"But we elected a Muslim mayor! These things were supposed to stop because we're not islamophobes! We need a Muslim Prime Minister, that'll really stop them!" "Terror attacks are part and parcell of living in a big city." "Now, please pray for the safety of our Muslim brothers and sisters in London. Our inaction on healthcare and climate change has pushed them to this." |
|
