|
Post by andrewk1988 on Feb 7, 2018 17:28:27 GMT -5
Whatever. I had a guy get me some fruit roll-ups. Each one is like 50 mg. I was getting to the point where I could eat 3/4 of one for a nice buzz. So one night I just ate a whole one. Don't know what it was but I was fucking hammered. I barely could function. It came close to me freaking out but I was at home so it wasn't too bad Andrew, maybe in a couple weeks to months I will hit you up about setting up a small grow How long does it take to grow a plant? A lot of it depends on the conditions of your grow space and how big of a plant you want to grow, but safest bet is 4 months from seed to chopping her down. You can significantly cut into that if you have access to clones instead of seed.
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Feb 7, 2018 17:37:47 GMT -5
I appreciate the diatribe, but you must have missed the part in my post about liking the crap shoot. Edibles makes up less than 5% of my cannabis intake. It's not worth it for me to put any time or effort into it beyond what I do. Next time you're across I70, hit me up. I'll give you some bud and you can test your theories yourself. Well it wasn't a theory, it just basic chemistry. I was just offering up that method to maximize THC for your butter (about 97% THCA to THC from the baking), and help make it consistent.
|
|
|
Post by HumanAgent on Feb 7, 2018 17:39:02 GMT -5
10mg is the usual dosage.. For more experienced its about 30mg. Then build up from there. Yeah, maybe if you're a wee little girl who doesn't want to get her knickers knocked off. He's Canadian... In all seriousness it's different for everyone but you definitely do not want to have a bad experience. That's the recommended dosage in edibles in Colorado.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Feb 7, 2018 17:40:39 GMT -5
Whatever. I had a guy get me some fruit roll-ups. Each one is like 50 mg. I was getting to the point where I could eat 3/4 of one for a nice buzz. So one night I just ate a whole one. Don't know what it was but I was fucking hammered. I barely could function. It came close to me freaking out but I was at home so it wasn't too bad Andrew, maybe in a couple weeks to months I will hit you up about setting up a small grow How long does it take to grow a plant? Just an idea, this is two plants harvested from a 4'x4'x6' tent. Each jar is 2(ish) ounces, you can do the math. The tent I was talking about that I set up is half of that footprint. It's 2x2x5. Significantly cheaper on the electric bill to light/ventilate an area that small too. It's perfect for one decent sized plant or even 4-6 "single cola" type small plants, if you crave variety of strains.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Feb 7, 2018 17:43:30 GMT -5
Yeah, maybe if you're a wee little girl who doesn't want to get her knickers knocked off. He's Canadian... In all seriousness it's different for everyone but you definitely do not want to have a bad experience. That's the recommended dosage in edibles in Colorado. I know, just fucking with you. I have a lot of experience with cannabis and psychedelics, so I don't have a problem with letting go and submitting to the experience once I decide to do it. A lot of people have a tough time giving up control of their consciousness. It's the same principle with a "bad trip" on mushrooms or lsd. To quote Dewey Cox in the "dropping acid with the Beatles" scene: "Oh no, I had a bad thought!" Pussies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 18:26:43 GMT -5
I was just telling a story of mine and illustrating that I am a lightweight when it comes to that. Nothing on you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 19:27:13 GMT -5
I ate a 450 mg bag of gummy sour rolls during the world series. Rode the wave for real!
|
|
|
Post by agrappleaday on Feb 7, 2018 23:18:49 GMT -5
I think I may have mentioned in another thread but my go to edible is a 1000mg brownie. I usually eat 1/3 at a time and find myself in a good place before I eventually find myself in a great slumber. I did eat about 2/3 once and went to a comedy show but I won't be doing that again anytime soon. Being at a show so stoned was not as fun as I expected, I had a helluva time staying awake and could hardly pay attention to the jokes... I remember enjoying the lighting more than the comedians.
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Mar 23, 2018 11:32:42 GMT -5
So I'm assuming this thread is going to be deleted soon with the new laws passed yesterday regarding online forums. Big government strikes again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2018 12:49:12 GMT -5
Didn't realize we were advertising hookers in this thread...
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Mar 23, 2018 13:25:47 GMT -5
Didn't realize we were advertising hookers in this thread... It's cute you think the law will be limited to that. It opens the door to civil/criminal liabilities being passed on to the online platforms regardless of the crime. They used sex trafficking to get it passed, but the tools to go after them they are giving themselves apply to everything for the time being once it is signed. Hopefully this will wind up in front of SCOTUS and they'll either gut it or strike it down. As it stands though, if someone here, like you or Andrew gets busted growing, they can claim that advice you gleamed from this thread helped you grow your weed and then charge ProBoards with criminal charges. This is the government for you, always throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2018 18:23:56 GMT -5
They can't prove that I learned anything here. The idea that they would even try is hilarious.
The entire point of that law was to allow people who are victims of sex trafficking to have the opportunity to respond to the places that might have assisted in that activity online. It has nothing to do with legal drugs.
It's all so cute that you think you can explain a law to me when I have a lawyer laying in bed right next to me. LOL
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Mar 23, 2018 18:46:34 GMT -5
They can't prove that I learned anything here. The idea that they would even try is hilarious. The entire point of that law was to allow people who are victims of sex trafficking to have the opportunity to respond to the places that might have assisted in that activity online. It has nothing to do with legal drugs. It's all so cute that you think you can explain a law to me when I have a lawyer laying in bed right next to me. LOL That is not the point of the law, that is how they got the law passed. They wrapped up a destruction of the first amendment under the guise of stopping sex trafficking. The internet is the biggest weapon for democracy, and the US government hates Democracy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 9:50:03 GMT -5
LoL dude.
Almost nothing is going to change.
And absolutely nothing will change here because of that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 9:54:03 GMT -5
Well, Craigslist has already shut down as have other sites with personal ads. I think what you meant to say is, "almost nothing will change for me."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 10:00:43 GMT -5
Well, Craigslist has already shut down as have other sites with personal ads. I think what you meant to say is, "almost nothing will change for me." I just went to Craigslist. It's still working just fine. Maybe their hookers for hire section is gone? Who the fuck cares?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 10:30:57 GMT -5
Well, Craigslist has already shut down as have other sites with personal ads. I think what you meant to say is, "almost nothing will change for me." I just went to Craigslist. It's still working just fine. Maybe their hookers for hire section is gone? Who the fuck cares? The personal ads section. People who care? I'm sure there are plenty pissed about it but since it doesn't affect muh freedom or day to day activity, who cares if it restricts others, amirite?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 10:32:33 GMT -5
What a horribly liberal argument you made. Because it doesnt personally affect you, it doesn't matter. I know plenty of people that confiscating guns wouldn't affect so they should totally be allowed to restrict others freedoms and explain it away by, "who the fuck cares."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 10:49:26 GMT -5
What a horribly liberal argument you made. Because it doesnt personally affect you, it doesn't matter. I know plenty of people that confiscating guns wouldn't affect so they should totally be allowed to restrict others freedoms and explain it away by, "who the fuck cares." I checked the personal section on Craigslist as well. Still working. So either you're getting wrapped up in all the brouhaha without actually checking to see if it's true, or nothing has changed at all. Because nothing is going to as far as this website or any of the other websites I go to are concerned. And no, I did not make a liberal argument. The simple fact remains that if you're looking for anything illicit, you use Tor, not Chrome or Explorer or Firefox. Your freedom to break the law will always exist regardless of what laws they create. Except this law revolves around sex trafficking and human trafficking and other horrible shit. There's a difference between a woman deciding she wants to spread her legs to get paid and a woman who's been kidnapped and is being forced to do so. I have no problem with them attempting to crack down on the latter. I'm surprised that you don't have a problem with them trying to crack down on that sort of thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 10:59:52 GMT -5
I don't give a fuck if the freedom that sex traffickers have enjoyed is being diminished. We're not cracking down on the people who are actually engaging in that activity, we are cracking down on the people who are making it easier for them to do so.
Because forever, the people who ran the websites that made it easier for these vile individuals to engage in their disgusting Behavior were completely immune to prosecution. But, the personal section in Craigslist is not shut down.
I also wouldn't really give a fuck if they decided to shut down plenty of fish.com either.
I really have no problem with the government eliminating the freedom of people who are engaging in destructive behavior that hurts other people. I kind of thought that was one of the points of government?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 12:32:24 GMT -5
Right.... It only affects sex traffickers. I'm sure Facebook, Google, and ACLU are up in arms because this law only affects sex traffickers.
Just like giving police the ability to confiscate large sums of money to combat "drug trafficking" had never been abused and people lost their livelihood over it but fuck em, doesn't affect me.
Yes, this is an affront to free speech and gives the government too much power and you gobble it up because it supposedly helps sex trafficking. Since it doesn't affect you looking for a side piece, who gives a fuck.
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Mar 24, 2018 12:33:17 GMT -5
It isn't just going after sex traffickers though. Reddit has closed hunddreds of subreddits because of the new liabilities. Everything from beer trading, various gun discussion, tobacco related, etc...
Also, the personals are shut down, if you go to any of them you get the message
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 12:34:11 GMT -5
www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/23/596460672/craigslist-shuts-down-personals-section-after-congress-passes-bill-on-traffickinYou can still find furniture or a roommate on Craigslist. But ads seeking romance or sexual connections are no longer going to be available, after Craigslist took down the "personals" section Friday for its U.S. site. The company says it made the change because Congress has passed the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, meant to crack down on sex trafficking of children. It was approved by a landslide in the Senate earlier this week, as NPR's Alina Selyukh has reported, but has been met with criticism by free speech advocates and sex workers. As Craigslist wrote, the law seeks "to subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully." Yeah, NPR
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Mar 24, 2018 12:36:15 GMT -5
www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/23/596460672/craigslist-shuts-down-personals-section-after-congress-passes-bill-on-traffickinYou can still find furniture or a roommate on Craigslist. But ads seeking romance or sexual connections are no longer going to be available, after Craigslist took down the "personals" section Friday for its U.S. site. The company says it made the change because Congress has passed the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, meant to crack down on sex trafficking of children. It was approved by a landslide in the Senate earlier this week, as NPR's Alina Selyukh has reported, but has been met with criticism by free speech advocates and sex workers. As Craigslist wrote, the law seeks "to subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully." Yeah, NPR The underlying issue though is that Congress did not limit the criminal and civil liabilities to sex trafficking. Instead it is.... Because sex trafficking is such a problem, websites are now liable for third-party content.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 16:14:26 GMT -5
www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/23/596460672/craigslist-shuts-down-personals-section-after-congress-passes-bill-on-traffickinYou can still find furniture or a roommate on Craigslist. But ads seeking romance or sexual connections are no longer going to be available, after Craigslist took down the "personals" section Friday for its U.S. site. The company says it made the change because Congress has passed the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, meant to crack down on sex trafficking of children. It was approved by a landslide in the Senate earlier this week, as NPR's Alina Selyukh has reported, but has been met with criticism by free speech advocates and sex workers. As Craigslist wrote, the law seeks "to subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully." Yeah, NPR And yet...as of almost noon today: Much ado about nothing. There will be no crackdown on internet message boards like this one. Take off the tinfoil hats already you two. The kind of regulatory body required to actually handle a work load this size is beyond the federal government's reach. Just like bitcoin, weed, etc. If it does what is intended, then it pushes the people engaging in these practices to the spot they belong: the dark web. I have no issue holding sites that turn a blind eye to the scum that uses their sites accountable. If it forces them to close some avenues on their sites, oh well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 16:16:20 GMT -5
www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/23/596460672/craigslist-shuts-down-personals-section-after-congress-passes-bill-on-traffickinYou can still find furniture or a roommate on Craigslist. But ads seeking romance or sexual connections are no longer going to be available, after Craigslist took down the "personals" section Friday for its U.S. site. The company says it made the change because Congress has passed the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, meant to crack down on sex trafficking of children. It was approved by a landslide in the Senate earlier this week, as NPR's Alina Selyukh has reported, but has been met with criticism by free speech advocates and sex workers. As Craigslist wrote, the law seeks "to subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully." Yeah, NPR The underlying issue though is that Congress did not limit the criminal and civil liabilities to sex trafficking. Instead it is.... Because sex trafficking is such a problem, websites are now liable for third-party content. Nope. Not "responsible for third party content" in the broad context you're trying to claim they are. And it will end up being litigated. And it won't matter to 99.9% of the people who use the internet.
|
|
|
Post by Angelo on Mar 24, 2018 16:37:46 GMT -5
www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/23/596460672/craigslist-shuts-down-personals-section-after-congress-passes-bill-on-traffickinYou can still find furniture or a roommate on Craigslist. But ads seeking romance or sexual connections are no longer going to be available, after Craigslist took down the "personals" section Friday for its U.S. site. The company says it made the change because Congress has passed the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, meant to crack down on sex trafficking of children. It was approved by a landslide in the Senate earlier this week, as NPR's Alina Selyukh has reported, but has been met with criticism by free speech advocates and sex workers. As Craigslist wrote, the law seeks "to subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully." Yeah, NPR And yet...as of almost noon today: Much ado about nothing. There will be no crackdown on internet message boards like this one. Take off the tinfoil hats already you two. The kind of regulatory body required to actually handle a work load this size is beyond the federal government's reach. Just like bitcoin, weed, etc. If it does what is intended, then it pushes the people engaging in these practices to the spot they belong: the dark web. I have no issue holding sites that turn a blind eye to the scum that uses their sites accountable. If it forces them to close some avenues on their sites, oh well. Tony, click it, there is nothing there, it was removed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 16:44:14 GMT -5
I'm not hitting craigslist on this computer. Not like removing a field in their crap code would take more than five minutes, so I'm going to say I find your claim dubious. But even if those links are dead, the rest of you and Floyd's ridiculous position still hold no water.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 17:00:12 GMT -5
www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/23/596460672/craigslist-shuts-down-personals-section-after-congress-passes-bill-on-traffickinYou can still find furniture or a roommate on Craigslist. But ads seeking romance or sexual connections are no longer going to be available, after Craigslist took down the "personals" section Friday for its U.S. site. The company says it made the change because Congress has passed the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, meant to crack down on sex trafficking of children. It was approved by a landslide in the Senate earlier this week, as NPR's Alina Selyukh has reported, but has been met with criticism by free speech advocates and sex workers. As Craigslist wrote, the law seeks "to subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully." Yeah, NPR And yet...as of almost noon today: Much ado about nothing. There will be no crackdown on internet message boards like this one. Take off the tinfoil hats already you two. The kind of regulatory body required to actually handle a work load this size is beyond the federal government's reach. Just like bitcoin, weed, etc. If it does what is intended, then it pushes the people engaging in these practices to the spot they belong: the dark web. I have no issue holding sites that turn a blind eye to the scum that uses their sites accountable. If it forces them to close some avenues on their sites, oh well. Ummm... It allows local and state authorities to go after these websites. You are naive as fuck if you think this can't be abused by state authorities, just like, as I pointed out, confiscating large sums of money under the guise of stopping drug trafficking. I thought you were conservative? If you are, you would be totally against this bill that is affront to first amendment rights. Conspiracy theorists? You are high, again. Google, Facebook, and the ACLU are saying the same shit, this isn't a minority that sees how this could lead to abuse of power.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2018 17:01:14 GMT -5
I'm not hitting craigslist on this computer. Not like removing a field in their crap code would take more than five minutes, so I'm going to say I find your claim dubious. But even if those links are dead, the rest of you and Floyd's ridiculous position still hold no water. Lol. I'm not going to prove myself wrong. I'm always right. I know better than everyone because I'm married to a lawyer.
|
|