|
Post by andrewk1988 on Nov 19, 2020 12:49:41 GMT -5
Yeah, we're cheering on a political party destroying our democracy from the inside out! Yay fraudulent elections!
You're a fucking moron bro. It's comical...literally all tangible evidence points to a fair and free election but yet you're willing to die on a hill of 'It feels like" and just straight unsubstantiated lies. And on top of that accuse everyone who is accepting the reality of the results of being unpatriotic. Just for not being able to believe blatant lies and misinformation like you and your fellow mouth breathing titty babies.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Nov 19, 2020 13:50:25 GMT -5
Yeah, we're cheering on a political party destroying our democracy from the inside out! Yay fraudulent elections! You're a fucking moron bro. It's comical... literally all tangible evidence points to a fair and free election but yet you're willing to die on a hill of 'It feels like" and just straight unsubstantiated lies. And on top of that accuse everyone who is accepting the reality of the results of being unpatriotic. Just for not being able to believe blatant lies and misinformation like you and your fellow mouth breathing titty babies. Please expound on this Perhaps it’s true that you truly believe Joe Biden beat Trump legit, which is too dumb for even you
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 19, 2020 15:01:27 GMT -5
Could you please tell us more about these mathematical formulas designed to detect fraud? There’s Benford’s law, which I’m sure you’ll google and scoff at (then tell me “it’s not math, it’s statistics!”). It was cited as evidence of Iran’s rigged election 10 years ago (is that one a baseless conspiracy theory too?). Did you know that Benford's law was not, in fact, "designed" to detect fraud but was actually an observation about the distribution of digits? More importantly, can you please explain how Benford's law shows that there was fraud in this election? There are also other statistical “anomalies” such as the numbers of ballots which are only marked in for president and no other vote marked -Biden voters shattered a record there, while Trump’s votes follow the natural pattern, just as with benford’s law. Do you have any credible sources that what you're describing actually happened any more than it did in 2016, when, for example, Trump received 200,000 more votes than the state senate race did in the Georgia ( results.enr.clarityelections.com/GA/63991/184321/en/summary.html)? Neither of these are proof of voter fraud So you admit there's no proof? You’re not fooling anyone here, and neither is Andrew. Neither of you believe that Joe got in legitimately, but are happy with the steal. Both you chuds think that the electoral college is a scam, believe that Joe won the popular vote and so even if he cheated to get the presidency, he’s the “rightful winner.” Why wouldn't I believe Joe won legitimately when there is absolutely no meaningful evidence to the contrary? Were there spontaneous dance parties nation-wide when Trump won? Could it be that a lot of people actually just didn't want the cheeto in chief for another term?
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 19, 2020 15:13:09 GMT -5
I have one other question for people: does the fact that Trump has done nothing useful since the election (had a completely empty schedule in 12 of the last 16 days) indicate to you a serious winner who wants to lead the country through an economic and public heath crisis, or is it the behaviour of a whiny bitch baby who can't admit he lost because of how embarrassing it would be for him? Did anyone hear about Rudy Giuliani in Philly yesterday admitting their case in PA wasn't a fraud case? “If we had alleged fraud, then yes, but this is not a fraud case,” Giuliani said quickly.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Nov 19, 2020 16:56:05 GMT -5
Once again, comrade cock breath has questions that are either disingenuous or stupid. Benford's law is not what is used to prove fraud, it is a red flag test that is used to determine the likelihood of fraud. If something deviates from benford's law, it requires further investigation. Since Joe Biden's numbers deviate from benford's law, there needs to be more investigation. Standard operating procedure in several government agencies is that if the numbers violate benford's law investigation MUST occur. So guess what? It looks like investigations are going to occur.
Your second question is a nice attempt at whataboutism, but 2016 is not relevant. If the losing side was foolish enough to prematurely concede the results and not demand further investigation into everything that looked suspect, whose fault is that? Nice try, but 2016 doesn't matter.
Your third question is fucking dumb and your final question kind of reveals that you have an urbanite perspective because dance parties did not break out all over the nation. They broke out in a lot of cities that are filled with a lot of dip shitz City dwellers, but across the entire country? No. And what does dancing in the streets in the cities prove anyway? Nothing. Those dipshitz dancing in the street are analogous to Nero with his fiddle.
Trump hasn't done anything meaningful? He's fired a whole bunch of left-wing troglodytes who are part of the problem. I think that's great. What's even better is that you know this isn't over yet and things are getting worse every day for the Democrats.
It's going to be so funny when the house of cards that your side has constructed gets completely blown down by the judicial system. I know you keep on scoffing at that notion and you keep on trying to push the tired Trope that all of these cases are getting laughed out of court. Unfortunately, you're wrong about that and things are coming to light everyday. 5300 extra votes in Georgia that just showed up yesterday. And they provided Trump with a net gain.
This election is not over because your side fucking cheated. Might want to take a look at what happened in Michigan too because the only reason they certified those results was because they guaranteed the results would be audited. Audit = nothing over yet.
Why are you such a retard? When is your brain going to finally just stopped sending the signal to your heart to keep beating? Frankly, I'm impressed that you've made it this far. Kind of surprised your brain didn't forget how to breathe while you're asleep. 100% hoping that happens tonight.
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 19, 2020 22:10:59 GMT -5
Who knew Ben Sasse was secretly a Chavista Communist?
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Nov 20, 2020 1:01:24 GMT -5
It all reads as pretty desperate at this point. All the "your team, my team" talk really shows how far old tony has gotten off track with trumpism.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Nov 20, 2020 6:16:15 GMT -5
Who knew Ben Sasse was secretly a Chavista Communist? I did, years ago
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Nov 20, 2020 8:02:28 GMT -5
It all reads as pretty desperate at this point. All the "your team, my team" talk really shows how far old tony has gotten off track with trumpism. This has nothing to do with the matter at hand. You don’t find it curious that the votes putting Biden over come from the most corrupt and crime ridden areas of the country? Not curious at all that they prevented poll watchers from watching polls? Not curious at all that truckloads of ballots arrived in the dead of night that gave Biden the “win?” Not curious at all that our electronic vote counting software - a simple task, really, was made so ridiculously convoluted? Not curious at all that the vote counting software finds its roots in Venezuela? Not curious at all that so much vote counting was outsourced over a thousand miles across the ocean? Again, it’s counting; a very simple operation. Not curious at all, the statistical irregularities which have long been a reliable indicator of fraud, occurring all at once, in Biden’s favor? Not curious at all, the high ranking software programmer Eric Coomer, boasting to his fellow antifa goons*, that he “made fucking sure” Trump wouldn’t win? Not curious at all, the hundreds and hundreds of sworn affidavits bearing witness to organized voter fraud? Apparently not, because the media has waved its hand and said “These are not the vote fraud you’re looking for,” which is good enough to for you * yeah antifa: they’ll organize to burn your city, chant “we want dead cops,” but they would NEVER organize to commit vote fraud, right?
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Nov 20, 2020 8:05:39 GMT -5
Yeah, we're cheering on a political party destroying our democracy from the inside out! Yay fraudulent elections! You literally are I’d like to hear some of this tangible evidence you speak of. Affidavits are tangible. Video of Dominion software engineer essentially boasting that he was going to fix the election (“made fucking sure Trump won’t win”) is tangible. Video of vote counters putting up barriers against observation (why would they do that?) is tangible.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Nov 20, 2020 8:57:36 GMT -5
Yeah, we're cheering on a political party destroying our democracy from the inside out! Yay fraudulent elections! You're a fucking moron bro. It's comical...literally all tangible evidence points to a fair and free election but yet you're willing to die on a hill of 'It feels like" and just straight unsubstantiated lies. And on top of that accuse everyone who is accepting the reality of the results of being unpatriotic. Just for not being able to believe blatant lies and misinformation like you and your fellow mouth breathing titty babies. What a bunch of stupid drivel. Andrew, your lack of an education is very apparent in each post to create. It's sad. You've got no evidence of any of the things that you claim, and that can be easily verified because if you had evidence you'd be posting it like crazy. But you have none. All you have is the word of the media. Because they're the only people saying this election is over and that the results are clear. Maybe try taking the meat is dick out of your mouth before you speak. It might make it so you start making more sense? It's hilarious to me that all of you retards who conveniently post media talking points always claim that you don't listen to the media. It's a hilarious irony that you are just as stupid as them if that is true. But it's not true. Because you know you watched the media. And you know that when our talking points are brought up you have to rely on the media stalking points in order to try and refute anything. You have no evidence that this is a legitimate election, all you have are your feels. There is evidence that this was an illegitimate election and there is a lot of it. It has been posted in here. It's truly pathetic that you accuse other people of living with their feels when the only reason that you are saying this is a legitimate election is because of how you feel about Donald Trump. So you can call people names or any of these other things but the truth is Andrew, you're a loser. And you voted for a loser. And now you're saying that the person who lost the election won the election because the media has convinced you that mail-in voting is suddenly a secure and legitimate means for carrying out an election. Until Donald Trump's case makes it to the Supreme Court, you guys are going to have a leg to stand on with any of this bullshit
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 20, 2020 11:24:11 GMT -5
It all reads as pretty desperate at this point. All the "your team, my team" talk really shows how far old tony has gotten off track with trumpism. This has nothing to do with the matter at hand. You don’t find it curious that the votes putting Biden over come from the most corrupt and crime ridden areas of the country? Not curious at all that they prevented poll watchers from watching polls? Not curious at all that truckloads of ballots arrived in the dead of night that gave Biden the “win?” Not curious at all that our electronic vote counting software - a simple task, really, was made so ridiculously convoluted? Not curious at all that the vote counting software finds its roots in Venezuela? Not curious at all that so much vote counting was outsourced over a thousand miles across the ocean? Again, it’s counting; a very simple operation. Not curious at all, the statistical irregularities which have long been a reliable indicator of fraud, occurring all at once, in Biden’s favor? Not curious at all, the high ranking software programmer Eric Coomer, boasting to his fellow antifa goons*, that he “made fucking sure” Trump wouldn’t win? Not curious at all, the hundreds and hundreds of sworn affidavits bearing witness to organized voter fraud? Apparently not, because the media has waved its hand and said “These are not the vote fraud you’re looking for,” which is good enough to for you * yeah antifa: they’ll organize to burn your city, chant “we want dead cops,” but they would NEVER organize to commit vote fraud, right? You have posted literally no evidence to support any of those allegations, let alone even links indicating that you understand the concepts of evidence, statistics, fraud, or voting, and I'm credulous? Do you do anything with your time but jerk off to Newsmax, Garth, you pathetic liar? Can you post a single piece of evidence showing that a) you understand the statistical concepts that indicate fraud, and b) that they actually do indicate fraud? Can you do just that one simple thing, you lying coward?
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 20, 2020 11:26:51 GMT -5
Yeah, we're cheering on a political party destroying our democracy from the inside out! Yay fraudulent elections! You literally are I’d like to hear some of this tangible evidence you speak of. Affidavits are tangible. Video of Dominion software engineer essentially boasting that he was going to fix the election (“made fucking sure Trump won’t win”) is tangible. Video of vote counters putting up barriers against observation (why would they do that?) is tangible. Have you read any of the affidavits, because if they alleged widespread fraud, why has every single Trump lawyer backed down from that claim when asked by a judge if they're alleging fraud? Have you seen the video? Can you post it here rather than asking us to take your word for it?
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Nov 20, 2020 11:27:02 GMT -5
Jesus you guys are so sad. It's pathetic that you actually believe any of that shit. It's embarrassing to read. I really hope that after all the dust settles and you start to put all the trumpism bullshit in the rear view of your life, you can still function in society at all. The conspiracy theorizing and calling for just pure partisan political blood from the supreme court like they are elected partisan officials and not the ultimate unbiased arbiters of justice in the US, it's all just dangerous sad. Basically the trumpers cried about the 'deep state' trying to stay in power illegally not because there was any evidence, just to project the idea so tfumo could do it and be cheered by you and your brethren of 82 IQ 'I'd rather be Russian than a democrat' neuro divergents.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Nov 20, 2020 16:57:06 GMT -5
Now you're trying to compare IQ sizes? I'm afraid that's another area where you lose, badly.
Functioning members of society usually are not involved in illegal marijuana grows. So, pretty hypocritical point to make on your part.
I also find it tremendously amusing that you have spent the last four years trying to say that Trump is a danger to your freedom without any evidence and you voted for the party that will restrict your freedoms even more despite never proving how Trump impinged on your freedom in the first place.
It is also completely in congruous with your constitutionalist positions on a number of issues and now you want to completely disregard the Constitution and cheer for the party that seems to also want to discard the Constitution.
I'm no psychologist, but it seems to me that you are definitely suffering from a borderline personality disorder.
Also worth noting that marijuana is legal in most communist countries because they want to try and keep their population poorly motivated and kind of stupid. And there you are out in the woods playing the role of a nice useful idiot helping them along.
I've noticed when you posted pictures of your face that most likely only your mom loves you were not wearing any glasses. You might want to go get those eyes checked. Because I have no idea what the fuck you could possibly be looking at to think that Joe Biden was a better choice than Donald Trump in the first place.
Your Love of Joe Biden is also another clear indication that you will most likely never run the marijuana company. Because whoever runs that company? They voted for Trump. And if you actually ran a company? You would have too.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Nov 20, 2020 18:02:06 GMT -5
Big to finally admit you aren't a grower and never have been. Your jealousy rings loud and clear my man. Lots of people talk it, but few people walk it.
The bitterness in your posts let's me know that I have made great choices in life. I can't imagine being in your frame of mind right now and just the hopelessness you obviously feel brother.
Prayers up to tone.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Nov 20, 2020 20:38:52 GMT -5
I don't believe there was any sort of admission from me in that post about anything to do with my life. People who own marijuana companies are classified as business owners. They are the same as the guy who owns the convenience store around the corner.
I don't know why you would think anyone in the world would be jealous of your criminal activity. It's not like it's even impressive criminal activity.
Meanwhile, based on things I've seen on social media, the guy you think I am just harvested a literal ton of hemp and is running three legal medical grows. I think you'd work for him, not the other way around. And yes, we all know that really bothers you.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Nov 21, 2020 0:58:31 GMT -5
Hahahaha shitty blurple LED indoor fantasy grow, now it's hemp fields of gold! What hot MJBiz 'investment' idea are you going to start talking about 3 years too late and claim to be in on the ground floor of next.
Meanwhile us lowly farmers are enjoying a great market and will continue to enjoy a great market that you'll just continue to day dream about what could have been like the stereotypical loser you portray yourself as.
Just don't shoot up a dispensary over it to take out your final rage out on from trunp losing.
I'll be keeping you in my prayers, bless your heart.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Nov 21, 2020 8:27:51 GMT -5
The truly hilarious part about this is every time I mention the success that the guy you think I am has had in the Cannabis industry, jealousy comes flowing out from your side. Now I've said a few times that I am not a grower and I am not the guy you think I am. What I do see is that his operation appears to be inside buildings using high-end equipment, and yours seems to be a backwoods hoop house outdoor grow. From what I have heard from people within the industry, the stuff that is grown indoors is both better and more expensive than the stuff that is grown Outdoors. So it really does look like he's doing better than you there. I'm not 100% positive what the points of all of his hemp growing is but I think it has something to do with CBD and this thing that the potheads called the Entourage effect. All I know is that every time I tell you how well he's doing, you get all bent out of shape. I don't know why, but it's obvious that it's a button I can push what I need to. So I'm going to keep pushing it.
Enjoying a great Market, huh? I'm sure it is great. And I'm also sure that despite how great it is, you'll be growing outside next year again too. From what I hear, all those outdoor guys have to grow outdoors because they don't have any money. And so it's kind of funny that you're saying everything is great in the market, but you're still not going to have enough money to be growing indoors next year. Maybe if you would voted for Donald Trump that would have worked itself out better.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Nov 21, 2020 11:31:37 GMT -5
You literally are I’d like to hear some of this tangible evidence you speak of. Affidavits are tangible. Video of Dominion software engineer essentially boasting that he was going to fix the election (“made fucking sure Trump won’t win”) is tangible. Video of vote counters putting up barriers against observation (why would they do that?) is tangible. Have you read any of the affidavits, because if they alleged widespread fraud, why has every single Trump lawyer backed down from that claim when asked by a judge if they're alleging fraud? Have you seen the video? Can you post it here rather than asking us to take your word for One of hundreds, took 4 seconds. rumble.com/vaxtwa-poll-watchers-locked-out-and-the-windows-blocked-in-wayne-county-michigan..html Check out the chud whose title is “Voting Systems Officer of Strategy and Security” for Dominion* and is an antifa commie, who assured his comrades that he “made fucking sure Trump won’t win.” Not curious? www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/report-anti-trump-dominion-voting-systems-security-chief-participating-antifa-calls-posted-antifa-manifesto-letter-trump-online/*Dominion, whose vote counting software was rejected by Canada for being too insecure against rigging, and whose counts just so happened to have produced all those statistically irregular, improbable Biden wins
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Nov 21, 2020 17:29:49 GMT -5
If any of it sticks in court, you have something to stand on. Otherwise these are opinion sites posting affidavits that have already been tossed out to try to get clicks.
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 22, 2020 2:14:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Nov 22, 2020 9:25:00 GMT -5
🤣 Looks like you finally shut the fuck up.
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 22, 2020 14:14:42 GMT -5
Interesting, so I ask you about an affidavit, and rather than giving a relevant response, you post a link to a video? Again, if the affidavits allege widespread fraud (they don't, by the way), then why do Trump's lawyers consistently back down from the allegation of fraud when asked by a judge? Who cares what Trump's goons say on Newsmax when they back down on the fraud claim in the only place it actually matters? Where's the video you referred to of the "antifa commie"? While we're at it, can you please explain to me what Benford's law is in your own words, and then can you please explain how it indicates any widespread fraud in the 2020 election? And if Dominion is so shitty, why was it used in at least 24 states? Do you want to throw out the votes in those states, too? That seems pretty undemocratic, doesn't it?
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 22, 2020 14:20:28 GMT -5
It's sort of hard to keep track of the absolute fire hose of bullshit you guys post just to avoid answering direct questions, so why don't I stick to just one main in a post: if there were evidence of widespread fraud, why hasn't it been presented in any court, and why have Trump's lawyers (including that fucking ghoul Giuliani) backed down whenever asked if they're alleging fraud?
If they had evidence, don't you think they would have actually presented it before Georgia and Philadelphia certified their election results?
In the words of Chris Christie:
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Nov 22, 2020 14:54:23 GMT -5
Interesting, so I ask you about an affidavit, and rather than giving a relevant response, you post a link to a video? not so interesting, schmuck. I’m not going do legwork to score points in an illegitimate debate. You do not operate in good faith or seek truth see what I mean about bad faith? You’ll draw the line denoting “not widespread’ wherever you want. more bad faith and weaseling. Trump’s lawyers aren’t there to make accusations, but to seek investigation. They’re not going to say a single word more than necessary Nobody, but it hasn’t played out yet. mea culpa, it was actually social media screenshots. And it’s interesting that on the one hand you cry foul because I linked video instead of text, now you cry that I linked text instead of video. That’s known as weaseling. To me, the most important issue is did fraud play the decisive role in the election , whereas in your case that obviously doesn’t matter. You’re an advocate seeking to exclude evidence and win by technicality
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 22, 2020 16:09:06 GMT -5
Garth, let's get this out in the open: you would like to throw out the votes of half the country and just proclaim Trump king of America, based on a cell phone video, an alleged social media post, and a profound misunderstanding of a statistical concept, is that correct? And you wonder why people think you're a loony fascist?
How can you expect me to debate such a ludicrous position?
Would you like a clear explanation of why Benford's Law applied to a cherry-picked selection of precincts (as it has been done in the sources I've seen, and you have been too chicken shit to even post a link or anything concrete, so that's what I have to go on) is not even close to evidence of any sort of wrongdoing? I have to ask myself, though: would you even be capable of understanding such a thing? And even if you did understand, would you ever admit that you'd been wrong about something that you saw on Newsmax or whatever bullshit "news" you read now that Yahoo has gone Communist?
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Nov 22, 2020 16:11:04 GMT -5
If anyone actually is interested in the math, would you be interested in actually reading about the math rather than taking a fucking moron like Garth's word for it? www-personal.umich.edu/~wmebane/inapB.pdf
|
|
|
Post by HumanAgent on Nov 22, 2020 17:08:12 GMT -5
It's sort of hard to keep track of the absolute fire hose of bullshit you guys post just to avoid answering direct questions This has to be the funniest thing you've written 😂 ... At least they answer your question, you on the other hand, don't answer any questions... Just fire off more questions...
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Nov 23, 2020 11:19:47 GMT -5
It's sort of hard to keep track of the absolute fire hose of bullshit you guys post just to avoid answering direct questions This has to be the funniest thing you've written 😂 ... At least they answer your question, you on the other hand, don't answer any questions... Just fire off more questions... At least they answer questions? Do they? Or do you just get caught up reading the unfettered bullshit and want to avoid any of it being steered at you, so you try to 'keep it fair' by throwing in potshots in their defense? Because the 'only asking questions' schtick wouldn't be hard to deal with if you didn't have indefensible positions. Uncle Tom ass shit, to be honest. I guess maybe you can pick up on Garth's hatred for you based your sexuality really being rooted in some closeted frustration of not finding the courage to live the life he yearns to or something.
|
|