Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2018 19:14:17 GMT -5
First off, NO...I haven't seen that, second of all THEN THEY ARE ALL WRONG including you: Here's more moron: Look at all the shit Dana said here: youtu.be/voI3QVdR16AAt 3:00: We had a text session yesterday that was not very good, most of the things I said I would probably not say on TV At 3:33 this is embarrassing for the sport and obviously for the UFC and this is the furthest thing from a stunt this is bad
At 4:22: Obviously yesterday I was in shock and very upset4:42: It’s so bad
In my opinion the way I see Conor Mcgregor is he’s a guy a lot of people look up to…but he never did anything like this… Interviewer: I can sense you feel let down by this: At 5:52 Dana: Absolutely I feel let down
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2018 19:17:47 GMT -5
It wouldn't matter if EVERYONE in the entire world disagreed with me, Dana's opinion is the only one's we are talking about or ever have been talking about.
He was happy last night that the event did well so he had clearly cheered up and was saying that worse things have happened in other sports than what Conor did, but at no point did he ever express being happy about what Conor did only happy this event did well.
Multiple times he has said in MANY different ways and different interviews that he's NOT happy, would change the situation if he could, was upset, was embarrassed for the UFC, felt let down, had a bad text session where he said things he'd rather not repeat to Conor.
You are SUCH a moron haha.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2018 19:27:50 GMT -5
I win lol.
God I hate my own immaturity to get into a debate with a troll but whatever haha.
|
|
|
Post by boboplata on Apr 9, 2018 6:13:33 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2018 9:37:10 GMT -5
Loco got this guy talking to himself again?
|
|
|
Post by jonas0tt0 on Apr 9, 2018 9:50:31 GMT -5
Loco +1
lolToehold smh...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2018 17:53:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jonas0tt0 on Apr 10, 2018 10:18:12 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2018 21:36:24 GMT -5
If by "everything" you mean "nothing" then I'm in total agreement.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2018 10:12:27 GMT -5
Conor just made everyone aware of a fighter named Khabib. Conor also made everyone want to see him fight a guy named Khabib.
I think the UFC should likely be thanking Conor. They couldnt pay for that kind of publicity.
|
|
|
Post by johncfc on Apr 12, 2018 10:38:02 GMT -5
Conor just made everyone aware of a fighter named Khabib. Conor also made everyone want to see him fight a guy named Khabib. I think the UFC should likely be thanking Conor. They couldnt pay for that kind of publicity. I agree. If none of the fighters got hurt and taken off the card, then it would have been genius.
|
|
|
Post by jonas0tt0 on Apr 12, 2018 11:08:44 GMT -5
Conor just made everyone aware of a fighter named Khabib. Conor also made everyone want to see him fight a guy named Khabib. I think the UFC should likely be thanking Conor. They couldnt pay for that kind of publicity. I agree. If none of the fighters got hurt and taken off the card, then it would have been genius. Still might be genius... 223 will still do really good numbers even with the canceled fights. The canceled fights will all be rescheduled, so what are the monetary damages?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2018 12:35:55 GMT -5
Conor just made everyone aware of a fighter named Khabib. Conor also made everyone want to see him fight a guy named Khabib. I think the UFC should likely be thanking Conor. They couldnt pay for that kind of publicity. I agree. If none of the fighters got hurt and taken off the card, then it would have been genius. I don't disagree with this. But at the same time, you have to break some eggs to make a Khabib/Conor superfight omelette. I'd also reckon that both borg and chisea will be getting paid more from settling out of court than either would have made in their entire career as a fighter. Not saying that to justify it, as it sucks for the both of them. But just saying
|
|
|
Post by jonas0tt0 on Apr 12, 2018 12:58:25 GMT -5
Everyone seems to come out ahead after the incident.
...except toehold.
|
|
|
Post by TheStorm on Apr 12, 2018 15:28:26 GMT -5
Everyone seems to come out ahead after the incident. ...except toehold. Toehold is just very naive. Not stupid or dumb, or behind really, just naive.
|
|
|
Post by Fasthands25 on Apr 12, 2018 15:58:19 GMT -5
Toehold vs Loco.
Make it happen Dana!
|
|
|
Post by TheStorm on Apr 12, 2018 19:54:01 GMT -5
Toehold vs Loco. Make it happen Dana! LOL toehold would smash twitter thug Loco
|
|
|
Post by jamesod on Apr 13, 2018 11:42:48 GMT -5
I win lol. God I hate my own immaturity to get into a debate with a troll but whatever haha. There's no better proof you've won an internet debate than having made three consecutive posts in the thread. Nice work, kid. Never change.
|
|
|
Post by locogato11283 on Apr 13, 2018 14:37:11 GMT -5
LOL
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2018 16:14:35 GMT -5
I win lol. God I hate my own immaturity to get into a debate with a troll but whatever haha. There's no better proof you've won an internet debate than having made three consecutive posts in the thread. Nice work, kid. Never change. I won't, I promise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2018 16:17:09 GMT -5
Everyone seems to come out ahead after the incident. ...except toehold. The debate wasn't about "coming out ahead", it was about whether or not Dana "didn't give a fuck" which he CLEARLY did. Also, did they really sell more tickets for a UFC NOT involving Conor because Conor started a riot? I tend to doubt that a large percentage of the ticket sales were because of Conor since he wasn't even on the card, but even if they did, it has nothing to do with the false claim that Dana was happy about the riot or didn't care. Dana just cheered up after the fact because he'd made money on a good card, but he still was not, and never was, happy about the Conor incident as you can see from Dana's quotes in the articles and how he called it "unfortunate" and said he "wished he could have stopped it" at the press conference. And loco: i don't read your posts anymore so don't waste time responding.
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Apr 13, 2018 22:11:05 GMT -5
Toehold for the win!
Keep doing you T. Never change. You make this place a whole more fun.
|
|
|
Post by Premier on Apr 13, 2018 22:15:57 GMT -5
BTW, no question the current UFC owners will milk this Conor situation for all its worth. Fuck right or wrong. This whole situation brought a lot of eyeballs to the UFC. Expect Conor vs Khabib to be the next money fight.
Maybe the state commission will try to rain on their parade. But at the end of the day, money talks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2018 10:34:41 GMT -5
Exactly....end of the day, money talks.
UFC is already using this as fodder for the Khabib/Conor hype...they are posting all the different angled videos on their social medias. They are gonna make a mint! Anyone every get mad about making a mint?
|
|
|
Post by locogato11283 on Apr 14, 2018 11:10:20 GMT -5
So, in terms of actually effecting the UFC's bottom line, money wise, and giving Dana White an overall bigger headache in terms of screwing up UFC cards and other important shit, who do you think has caused more problems: Jones or Conor? Jones has fucked up more times, hit a pregnant lady who he could have killed, I think ruined an entire card at one point for some reason (I forget why), multiple failed drug tests, coke, roids, fighting at weigh ins, etc. On the other hand, Conor has only messed up this one time, BUT...one could argue this mistake cost the UFC more money because he actually injured fighters like Chiesa, brought a mob of 20 guys and just generally caused mayhem on UFC premises. I think I'd say this one mistake will probably have cost the UFC more money than any one mistake Jones has made, but if you add up all of Jones' fuck ups vs just this one fuck up by Conor, I still think Jones takes the cake, and I still think they'll have Conor fight again because for all the problem's he's caused it's just going to make more drama and money for the UFC when he comes back. I mean the shit will sell like crazy if/when he comes back and fights Khabib or whoever has the belt. So, if you had to compare them, in terms of who has really caused bigger problems for Dana and the UFC, money wise and in terms or really just screwing up the UFC's plans, who do you think has messed up worse, Jones or Conor? Jones.. He lost them money. Conor made them money. The end.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2018 14:29:45 GMT -5
Loco: if you are posting to me you should stop cause you are on ignore and I'm going to keep you on, probably forever unless somehow I get super curious to see what crap you are saying, which I doubt I will...
Not sure if you are, but it'll save both you and me the aggravation of having to argue with eachother, and you the annoyance of always being proven wrong because every time we debate I'm right and you just never realize it haha.
|
|
|
Post by locogato11283 on Apr 14, 2018 21:50:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jonas0tt0 on Apr 14, 2018 21:51:51 GMT -5
Loco owning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2018 21:56:54 GMT -5
Glad I'm not reading it, and he sure as shit ain't "owning" if he's continuing to write to someone who has him on ignore haha. That would be like me saying I'm "owning" someone in an argument if I'm yelling at them while they have headphones on and can't hear me: basically, I'd be acting like a total retard.
|
|
|
Post by jonas0tt0 on Apr 14, 2018 22:06:16 GMT -5
That fact that you have him on ignore proves he owns you.
|
|