|
Post by andrewk1988 on Aug 8, 2020 20:25:23 GMT -5
Right, it's everybody BUT trump. I know the play book by now. That’s actually closer to the truth, you tool. Right, he's an outsider. Drain the swamp. All that bullshit went out the window once and for all the moment ol Billy Barr was appointed.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Aug 9, 2020 13:03:18 GMT -5
That’s actually closer to the truth, you tool. Right, he's an outsider. Drain the swamp. All that bullshit went out the window once and for all the moment ol Billy Barr was appointed.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Aug 9, 2020 14:42:25 GMT -5
Actually seems logical that the gov't of China wants Biden while Russia wants Trump. Not because of special secret relations between Russia and Trump but because Biden's marching orders include war with Russia. China's global plan is getting fucked hard by Trump's legal assault on Tencent and WeChat. I thought Biden was part of the secret communist agenda? Where does war with Russia fall in that? It's hard to keep track. I just want to make sure I follow the logical steps it takes to get to crying election interference in November. You think a collapsed communist regime is still communist and a bigger communist than the largest communist party in the world? Explain for us morons how that works.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Aug 9, 2020 17:49:01 GMT -5
So let me get this straight. I have to juxtapose your position that the Russians are now not communists with Garths opinions. But the communist Chinese government wants Biden to go to war with Russia....to what end? Has Q gotten there yet?
China is essentially a capitalist economy. They are just a very authoritarian almost totalitarian capitalist economy. It's not the 'communist' part of the Chinese that should scare you. They are 'communists' in the way the 3rs reich was a 'socialist' regime. The bad = authoritarianism/totalitarianism, not economic models. You dingle berries conflate capitalism and socialism and weave them interchangeably all the time. That should go to show you that it's not the economic model that's the problem with these regimes/empires.
But please, continue to paint the Russia=our friends narrative so I can see how spineless your cohort is.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Aug 9, 2020 20:20:21 GMT -5
So let me get this straight. I have to juxtapose your position that the Russians are now not communists with Garths opinions. But the communist Chinese government wants Biden to go to war with Russia....to what end? Has Q gotten there yet? China is essentially a capitalist economy. They are just a very authoritarian almost totalitarian capitalist economy. It's not the 'communist' part of the Chinese that should scare you. They are 'communists' in the way the 3rs reich was a 'socialist' regime. The bad = authoritarianism/totalitarianism, not economic models. You dingle berries conflate capitalism and socialism and weave them interchangeably all the time. That should go to show you that it's not the economic model that's the problem with these regimes/empires. But please, continue to paint the Russia=our friends narrative so I can see how spineless your cohort is. Never said they were our friends. I said they're not communist. China is 100٪ communist. To suggest otherwise is you carrying water for China. You're way out of your depth on that topic kid and effective Devil's advoc crap entails a grip on reality you're lacking. "China is essentially capitalist." That may be the dumbest thing you've ever said. They are a centrally planned economy with a dual currency that they manipulate against each other. They are a totalitarian nation run by a communist party. And your attempt to conflate those with capitalism is so retarded it begs the question of how much you grasp about either system. It's almost like Twitter has you defending communism like a well behaved drone. War between China's two biggest rivals weakens them and leaves China running supply lines to both sides. They can pick the bones that are left. But I'm glad you're not trying to pretend you've read The Art of War like you do with the Constitution. FYI: The Art of War was written by a Chinese general and is required reading in the Chinese education system. You should stfu and read it. It's useful in every facet of life.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Aug 9, 2020 22:09:21 GMT -5
So let me get this straight. I have to juxtapose your position that the Russians are now not communists with Garths opinions. Please elucidate on my opinions, so I may know what they are
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Aug 11, 2020 15:27:46 GMT -5
So Biden chose Kamala Harris... She’s gross
|
|
|
Post by cybergod on Aug 11, 2020 17:56:40 GMT -5
So Biden chose Kamala Harris... She’s gross Willie Brown's corpse just got a raging, throbbing erection.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Aug 12, 2020 8:48:55 GMT -5
Disgusting pick for VP. But it will be fitting to see Mike Pence get picked apart like the bumbling goon he is.
I know you guys hate her because she's black and a woman, but she has a terrible record that you should use in your Facebook arguments about her.
|
|
|
Post by MMAJim on Aug 12, 2020 9:20:27 GMT -5
Disgusting pick for VP. But it will be fitting to see Mike Pence get picked apart like the bumbling goon he is. I know you guys hate her because she's black and a woman, but she has a terrible record that you should use in your Facebook arguments about her. Is she black actually? I will say, I did search Tulsi Gabbard knocking her around in the debates. Due to that, I watched maybe 15-20 minutes of those old debates. It's a reminder of how ridiculous it is that Joe Biden is actually (as of this moment) still the presumptive nominee from the Democrat Party.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Aug 12, 2020 9:49:03 GMT -5
Disgusting pick for VP. But it will be fitting to see Mike Pence get picked apart like the bumbling goon he is. I know you guys hate her because she's black and a woman, but she has a terrible record that you should use in your Facebook arguments about her. Is she black actually? I will say, I did search Tulsi Gabbard knocking her around in the debates. Due to that, I watched maybe 15-20 minutes of those old debates. It's a reminder of how ridiculous it is that Joe Biden is actually (as of this moment) still the presumptive nominee from the Democrat Party. She's black enough for people to dislike her solely for it. They should hate her for being an authoritarian. But, Americans love them some safety and 'law and order', so she plays well with 'suburban' America. I agree, Biden is a joke of a nominee. But so is Trump, if you are willing to look at it objectively. So what's a guy to do?
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Aug 12, 2020 10:12:19 GMT -5
Is she black actually? I will say, I did search Tulsi Gabbard knocking her around in the debates. Due to that, I watched maybe 15-20 minutes of those old debates. It's a reminder of how ridiculous it is that Joe Biden is actually (as of this moment) still the presumptive nominee from the Democrat Party. She's black enough for people to dislike her solely for it. They should hate her for being an authoritarian. But, Americans love them some safety and 'law and order', so she plays well with 'suburban' America. I agree, Biden is a joke of a nominee. But so is Trump, if you are willing to look at it objectively. So what's a guy to do? Now you've got my attention again. Do tell us about that one time you objectively looked at Trump's administration.
|
|
|
Post by MMAJim on Aug 12, 2020 10:57:07 GMT -5
Is she black actually? I will say, I did search Tulsi Gabbard knocking her around in the debates. Due to that, I watched maybe 15-20 minutes of those old debates. It's a reminder of how ridiculous it is that Joe Biden is actually (as of this moment) still the presumptive nominee from the Democrat Party. She's black enough for people to dislike her solely for it. They should hate her for being an authoritarian. But, Americans love them some safety and 'law and order', so she plays well with 'suburban' America. I agree, Biden is a joke of a nominee. But so is Trump, if you are willing to look at it objectively. So what's a guy to do? Vote for Trump and suggest that Democrats take a sober look at how they select candidates for 2024. That's what I'll do at this point. I'm pretty sure I said something to that effect in 2016 after the election, though I did not vote for Trump in that one. I'd also recommend that Democrats made a bad choice to try to go with sheer dread and terror from the moment that Trump was elected. It's a simple Party Who Cried Wolf scenario. I get why they tried to convince everyone Trump was an immediate existential threat to the USA, it's a political play. That's fine. You can't beat that drum for 3.5 years and expect that 0% of people on the fence see through it or at least get fatigued by it. Foolish strategy. WW3 with Iran remains my personal favorite, but that was late in the game. Just to expand on WW3 with Iran. I think what I like about it is that it was so wildly dramatic, immediately jumping to WW3 status. Then almost as quickly totally disregarded by CNN, et al, and never mentioned again. Reminds me of couples, and usually we all know them, just fight and bitch at eachother every night you ever end up out with them. Then the next morning, always act happy and pretend like no raging drunken couple-drama took place the previous night.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Aug 12, 2020 13:31:14 GMT -5
Lol at me voting for Trump again. I support you and your decision to do so though.
To me it's not difficult, the country is in a much worse place than 4 years ago. So, guys gotta go. I get that there is a lot of 'well he's good for my stonks', but there's very little evidence to me that he or his administration are responsible for any of it.
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Aug 12, 2020 13:31:57 GMT -5
She's black enough for people to dislike her solely for it. They should hate her for being an authoritarian. But, Americans love them some safety and 'law and order', so she plays well with 'suburban' America. I agree, Biden is a joke of a nominee. But so is Trump, if you are willing to look at it objectively. So what's a guy to do? Now you've got my attention again. Do tell us about that one time you objectively looked at Trump's administration. Oh yeah, I have been pretty worried about your attention. I wasn't aware it wavered.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Aug 12, 2020 15:20:02 GMT -5
Now you've got my attention again. Do tell us about that one time you objectively looked at Trump's administration. Oh yeah, I have been pretty worried about your attention. I wasn't aware it wavered. Extremely weak deflection. Everyone knows that you have never taken an objective look. That's probably why you're incapable of understanding the direct correlation with his administration and the stock market. (Here's a hint, genius. When you give tax breaks people have more money to spend on that the goods that the companies in the stock market provide. When you fax excessively the stock market closed down because the government is getting all of that money.) The only people that will tell you this country is worse off now than it was four years ago or the people that are selling you the narrative that you're happily consuming. The same people who told you that "The Gestapo" was pulling random civilians off the streets. Same people who called launching professional grade fireworks at a courthouse "peaceful protests". An objective look. That's really funny coming from you.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Aug 12, 2020 16:07:30 GMT -5
Think you'd be seeing this story if Hillary had won in 2016, Prince Andrew? finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/hon-hai-beats-profit-estimates-060452835.html"A key supplier to Apple Inc. and a dozen other tech giants plans to split its supply chain between the Chinese market and the U.S., declaring that China’s time as factory to the world is finished because of the trade war." Who started that trade War? Oh yeah. That guy. What an idiot. Clearly had no idea what he was doing.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Aug 12, 2020 16:08:05 GMT -5
Disgusting pick for VP. But it will be fitting to see Mike Pence get picked apart like the bumbling goon he is. I know you guys hate her because she's black and a woman, but she has a terrible record that you should use in your Facebook arguments about her. Your Biden/ Harris advocacy is off to a bad start. Invoking both race and gender so quickly is like a scared fighter attacking from the opening bell at 100 mph with stiff, awkward haymakers.
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Aug 12, 2020 16:11:05 GMT -5
Is she black actually? I will say, I did search Tulsi Gabbard knocking her around in the debates. Due to that, I watched maybe 15-20 minutes of those old debates. It's a reminder of how ridiculous it is that Joe Biden is actually (as of this moment) still the presumptive nominee from the Democrat Party. She's black enough for people to dislike her solely for it. They should hate her for being an authoritarian. But, Americans love them some safety and 'law and order', so she plays well with 'suburban' America. I agree, Biden is a joke of a nominee. But so is Trump, if you are willing to look at it objectively. So what's a guy to do? I would like you to go on about Kamala’s “authoritarianism.” I don’t disagree that she is, but my feeling is that you’ll still manage a bumbling, silly interpretation that is 180 degrees from reality
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Aug 12, 2020 16:11:33 GMT -5
Oh yeah, I have been pretty worried about your attention. I wasn't aware it wavered. Extremely weak deflection. Everyone knows that you have never taken an objective look. That's probably why you're incapable of understanding the direct correlation with his administration and the stock market. (Here's a hint, genius. When you give tax breaks people have more money to spend on that the goods that the companies in the stock market provide. When you fax excessively the stock market closed down because the government is getting all of that money.) The only people that will tell you this country is worse off now than it was four years ago or the people that are selling you the narrative that you're happily consuming. The same people who told you that "The Gestapo" was pulling random civilians off the streets. Same people who called launching professional grade fireworks at a courthouse "peaceful protests". An objective look. That's really funny coming from you. Who do you think is paying for those tax breaks? Do you think it's worth the trillions of dollars of new debt? www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-poised-to-add-more-debt-than-obama-in-first-termPS - Can you find a source that objectively shows that stock market returns are dramatically better under Trump than they were under Obama (or Clinton, for that matter)? Why don't you start here dqydj.com/etf-return-calculator/ ? Edit: To clarify, if you had invested $1,000,000 in "the stock market" on inauguration day 2017, how much better off would you be after 3.5 years than if you'd invested $1,000,000 on inauguration day 2009 and waited 3.5 years? PPS - Can you tell me what "worst case scenario" means?
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Aug 12, 2020 17:27:30 GMT -5
I can see it straight up in my own portfolio. If you had one you'd see it too. It's especially noticeable given the decline the pandemic caused. If we had been stifling business prior to the pandemic there's no fucking way that the market would have charged back the way that it did. At least not with the current crop of investors. Because a lot of this rise has been driven by Robinhood people like Andrew who don't actually know what the fuck they're doing. Those people wouldn't have had any money to invest if it weren't for Trump and his tax breaks.
Worst case scenario: What you imply we are in every time you talk about the Coronavirus. But, at least now you can admit that we're not in that situation.
Obama's stock growth was average. The market went up slowly, in spite of him.
Trumps. Growth was far superior. And if China had handled the coronavirus correctly and not Unleashed it on the world, there would be no question. So once again your stupid ass is ignoring China. Maybe it's time I start ignoring you until you pay attention to what actually matters.
And, I don't care about the national debt. Because the solution is simple and eventually when the national debt becomes enough of a problem, we will implement the solution. Do you know what it is? Of course you don't. But I do. And I'm not telling you. 🖕
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Aug 12, 2020 18:10:37 GMT -5
I can see it straight up in my own portfolio. If you had one you'd see it too. It's especially noticeable given the decline the pandemic caused. If we had been stifling business prior to the pandemic there's no fucking way that the market would have charged back the way that it did. At least not with the current crop of investors. Because a lot of this rise has been driven by Robinhood people like Andrew who don't actually know what the fuck they're doing. Those people wouldn't have had any money to invest if it weren't for Trump and his tax breaks. Worst case scenario: What you imply we are in every time you talk about the Coronavirus. But, at least now you can admit that we're not in that situation. Obama's stock growth was average. The market went up slowly, in spite of him. Trumps. Growth was far superior. And if China had handled the coronavirus correctly and not Unleashed it on the world, there would be no question. So once again your stupid ass is ignoring China. Maybe it's time I start ignoring you until you pay attention to what actually matters. And, I don't care about the national debt. Because the solution is simple and eventually when the national debt becomes enough of a problem, we will implement the solution. Do you know what it is? Of course you don't. But I do. And I'm not telling you. 🖕 There is literally nothing factual in your reply, and some straight out lies, so why should I bother continuing to engage with you? It's nothing but strawman arguments against things I never said or else bullshit about the stock market which is completely unsupported by evidence even when I give you the means by which to find evidence, and you expect me to take you seriously? Why would I? 2020 is fucked up for a lot of reasons, but who would have predicted that I would miss Baph because of how fucking stupid the people who remained here are (that includes you, Andrew)?
|
|
|
Post by slaytan on Aug 12, 2020 19:07:31 GMT -5
So my buddy who was dead wrong in 08, 12, and 16 says Trump is going to steamroll Biden/Harris. I think he may be wrong again.
Trump won by very few points in 2016, in a very few states, vs an overconfident Hillary who didn’t even visit or spend money in some of them. Black participation was low in 2016. It promises to be higher in 20 Hillary had zero charisma, and neither did Kaine. Kamala is, to me, very transparently nasty, but I do realize that she comes off impressive to schmucks. The global deep state has succeeded in creating bad news The demographic change that the left alternates between gloating over and calling a lunatic theory is 4 years further down the road The dumbocrats can brazenly cheat and get away with it.
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Aug 12, 2020 19:27:54 GMT -5
I can see it straight up in my own portfolio. If you had one you'd see it too. It's especially noticeable given the decline the pandemic caused. If we had been stifling business prior to the pandemic there's no fucking way that the market would have charged back the way that it did. At least not with the current crop of investors. Because a lot of this rise has been driven by Robinhood people like Andrew who don't actually know what the fuck they're doing. Those people wouldn't have had any money to invest if it weren't for Trump and his tax breaks. Worst case scenario: What you imply we are in every time you talk about the Coronavirus. But, at least now you can admit that we're not in that situation. Obama's stock growth was average. The market went up slowly, in spite of him. Trumps. Growth was far superior. And if China had handled the coronavirus correctly and not Unleashed it on the world, there would be no question. So once again your stupid ass is ignoring China. Maybe it's time I start ignoring you until you pay attention to what actually matters. And, I don't care about the national debt. Because the solution is simple and eventually when the national debt becomes enough of a problem, we will implement the solution. Do you know what it is? Of course you don't. But I do. And I'm not telling you. 🖕 There is literally nothing factual in your reply, and some straight out lies, so why should I bother continuing to engage with you? It's nothing but strawman arguments against things I never said or else bullshit about the stock market which is completely unsupported by evidence even when I give you the means by which to find evidence, and you expect me to take you seriously? Why would I? 2020 is fucked up for a lot of reasons, but who would have predicted that I would miss Baph because of how fucking stupid the people who remained here are (that includes you, Andrew)? You shouldn't keep engaging me. But you just can't resist. Thing is, you're here to be annoying. But your Socratic method is weak, and I'm having fun turning your game around on you because I'm under zero obligation to take your questions seriously.
|
|
|
Post by HumanAgent on Aug 12, 2020 19:46:29 GMT -5
The people that are here are stupid yet I'm going to stick around and engage them... 🙄
You're the one that can never answer a simple question at time...
|
|
|
Post by andrewk1988 on Aug 13, 2020 8:57:06 GMT -5
Everyone here thinks they have a God given right to demand answers from other people to their questions.
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Aug 13, 2020 9:22:20 GMT -5
The people that are here are stupid yet I'm going to stick around and engage them... 🙄 You're the one that can never answer a simple question at time... What, like you’ve never done anything that is obviously a waste of time and energy before?
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Question on Aug 13, 2020 9:24:07 GMT -5
We’re all cool with Trump admitting he’s sabotaging the USPS for the purpose of voter suppression, right?
|
|
|
Post by ghostoftc on Aug 13, 2020 10:21:27 GMT -5
We’re all cool with Trump admitting he’s sabotaging the USPS for the purpose of voter suppression, right? Yup. Because your stupid spin fails to make the important distinction between absentee voting and Universal mail-in voting. I'm not surprised that you didn't make that distinction though, because your Masters in the media haven't either. You might want to learn about the difference. Because it's kind of glaringly obvious how big a distinction it is and how bad Universal mail-in voting would be for this nation. You should probably change your name to Comrade Clueless.
|
|
|
Post by HumanAgent on Aug 13, 2020 10:28:30 GMT -5
The people that are here are stupid yet I'm going to stick around and engage them... 🙄 You're the one that can never answer a simple question at time... What, like you’ve never done anything that is obviously a waste of time and energy before? As long as you know you're wasting your time... You know that nobody is changing any one else's mind, right?
|
|